Guest guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Share Posted April 5, 2002 Yes, there is a fundamental shift in one's perspective when rosacea is no longer viewed as an entity whose flares that can be controlled if one can only figure out how, whose skin can be wonderful if one can only find the right product, is fully understandable if one can only grab hold of the right theory...To me, that puts the onus on the person: if your skin doesn't look good it's your fault -- you aren't trying enough products, you aren't taking the right vitamins, you're too stressed -- if you flare it's because you did something wrong etc etc etc. As you say, that's just not reality. That kind of hope isn't realistic hope, and the resultant letdown can feel painful to people who are already suffering. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 The National cea Society did mention a study in one of their more recent newsletters stating that over 50% of patients treated with topical Metronidazole were able to keep their cea in remission. (or something to that effect.. not entirely sure on the details, as it has been several months since I read it) However, the National cea Society is a good resource, but they arent perfect... Im not sure if this number is accurate or not. I did just come across a medical article discussing treatment of patients using " A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel group trial conducted at 3 separate clinical sites located in 3 US cities. The study enrolled 72 rosacea patients with at least 8 to 50 inflammatory facial lesions (pustules and papules) and moderately severe facial erythema. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.75% metronidazole cream or 1.0% metronidazole cream " that says: " Results: The overall median percentage change in lesion count at end point for patients in the 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -62% compared with -60% for the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. The overall percentage change in erythema scores at endpoint for patients in the 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -26% compared with -30% for patients in the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. Regarding physician assessment of global severity, 57% of subjects (20/35) in the 0.75% metronidazole cream group compared with 37% of subjects (13/35) in the 1.0% metronidazole cream group were rated as having a clear to mild condition at end point. Both drugs were well tolerated; there was no significant difference in the number of drug-related adverse events between the two agents. Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of erythema is between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as mild/cleared at the end? Anyway, I have probably come close to a 25% or so improvement in redness using Noritate, so that seems about right, but I certainly wouldnt consider that clearance.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 > I would take comments such as the one about this support group's > experience not being mainstream or typical (how would any one > member know the experience of over 2000 members?? Especially since > most of them do not even post!) with a huge grain of salt. , your grain of salt can be the size of a mountain , but that doesn't change the facts: there are an estimated 13 million people with rosacea in the US alone, and many (16?) millions more in Canada and Northern Europe, most of whom respond to conventional medical treatment. That's not to slight the millions who are not successfully managed, including many if not most of the 2000+ members of this group. Quite the contrary. To me, the question is why don't these people respond to medical treatment like the majority of rosaceans -- what makes them not mainstream, what makes them atypical. > I am certain that there is a way for everyone to re-establish > healthy skin - regardless of what " studies " indicate or not. I don't believe that's a realistic expectation for many rosaceans. Certainly with good management virtually all rosaceans can have healthier skin, but with the understanding that exacerbations and remissions may still be a part of their life. Along with you, I wish there was a way for all rosaceans to re- establish healthy skin. I wish everyone with multiple sclerosis could re-establish a healthy neurological system. I wish, I wish, I wish... Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 Hi all When I made reference to studies, I was not referring only to those conducted by the National cea Society ( where I have been a member for 12-13 years ). Dr. Wilkin, and Dr Dah are two names which quickly come to mind. I am talking about well designed scientific studies, not ancedotal ones ) but those with controls. it is unfortunate that The National rosacea Society has come to be viewed with suspicion due to their assocation with Galderma which does have a lot to gain from promoting its own products. Hope that we as a group can contine this dialogue in the same spirit in which it was started . Not to be a put down on all of us who have had the unfortunate luck and genetics to have this irritating ( no pun intended ) skin thing, but as a way of initiating a forum to prompt us to take a hard look at what we are expecting from the meds, the topicals, the orals, the cosmetics, and what we can realistically expect . i hope that I will not be seen as a " problem poster " I enjoy visting here and talking with you all. I hope that we can continue an open and frank discussion. I don't mind criticism despite my thin skinned face, I am pretty thick skinned eveywhere else. Take care all BTW. I am really giving the metrogel a chance this time. And not expecting a miracle like I did before . I hope that when I feel like giivng up that I will have the strength and conviction ( with your help and encouragement ) to continue. Thanks for enduring my posts. All the best as we struggle to come to terms with this. May be continue to grow and share and learn. > The National cea Society did mention a study in one of their more > recent newsletters stating that over 50% of patients treated with topical > Metronidazole were able to keep their cea in remission. (or something > to that effect.. not entirely sure on the details, as it has been several > months since I read it) However, the National cea Society is a good > resource, but they arent perfect... Im not sure if this number is accurate > or not. I did just come across a medical article discussing treatment of > patients using " A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel > group trial conducted at 3 separate clinical sites located in 3 US cities. > The study enrolled 72 rosacea patients with at least 8 to 50 inflammatory > facial lesions (pustules and papules) and moderately severe facial erythema. > Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.75% metronidazole cream > or 1.0% metronidazole cream " that says: > > " Results: The overall median percentage change in lesion count at end point > for patients in the 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -62% > compared with -60% for the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. The > overall percentage change in erythema scores at endpoint for patients in the > 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -26% compared with -30% for > patients in the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. Regarding > physician assessment of global severity, 57% of subjects (20/35) in the > 0.75% metronidazole cream group compared with 37% of subjects (13/35) in the > 1.0% metronidazole cream group were rated as having a clear to mild > condition at end point. Both drugs were well tolerated; there was no > significant difference in the number of drug-related adverse events between > the two agents. > > Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of erythema is > between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as mild/cleared at the > end? Anyway, I have probably come close to a 25% or so improvement in > redness using Noritate, so that seems about right, but I certainly wouldnt > consider that clearance.. > > > > > > -- > Please read the list highlights before posting to the whole group (http://rosacea.ii.net/toc.html). Your post will be delayed if you don't give a meaningful subject or trim your reply text. You must change the subject when replying to a digest ! > > See http://www.drnase.com for info on his recently published book. > > To leave the list send an email to rosacea-support-unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 Hi all When I made reference to studies, I was not referring only to those conducted by the National cea Society ( where I have been a member for 12-13 years ). Dr. Wilkin, and Dr Dah are two names which quickly come to mind. I am talking about well designed scientific studies, not ancedotal ones ) but those with controls. it is unfortunate that The National rosacea Society has come to be viewed with suspicion due to their assocation with Galderma which does have a lot to gain from promoting its own products. Hope that we as a group can contine this dialogue in the same spirit in which it was started . Not to be a put down on all of us who have had the unfortunate luck and genetics to have this irritating ( no pun intended ) skin thing, but as a way of initiating a forum to prompt us to take a hard look at what we are expecting from the meds, the topicals, the orals, the cosmetics, and what we can realistically expect . i hope that I will not be seen as a " problem poster " I enjoy visting here and talking with you all. I hope that we can continue an open and frank discussion. I don't mind criticism despite my thin skinned face, I am pretty thick skinned eveywhere else. Take care all BTW. I am really giving the metrogel a chance this time. And not expecting a miracle like I did before . I hope that when I feel like giivng up that I will have the strength and conviction ( with your help and encouragement ) to continue. Thanks for enduring my posts. All the best as we struggle to come to terms with this. May be continue to grow and share and learn. > The National cea Society did mention a study in one of their more > recent newsletters stating that over 50% of patients treated with topical > Metronidazole were able to keep their cea in remission. (or something > to that effect.. not entirely sure on the details, as it has been several > months since I read it) However, the National cea Society is a good > resource, but they arent perfect... Im not sure if this number is accurate > or not. I did just come across a medical article discussing treatment of > patients using " A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel > group trial conducted at 3 separate clinical sites located in 3 US cities. > The study enrolled 72 rosacea patients with at least 8 to 50 inflammatory > facial lesions (pustules and papules) and moderately severe facial erythema. > Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.75% metronidazole cream > or 1.0% metronidazole cream " that says: > > " Results: The overall median percentage change in lesion count at end point > for patients in the 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -62% > compared with -60% for the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. The > overall percentage change in erythema scores at endpoint for patients in the > 0.75% metronidazole cream treatment group was -26% compared with -30% for > patients in the 1.0% metronidazole cream treatment group. Regarding > physician assessment of global severity, 57% of subjects (20/35) in the > 0.75% metronidazole cream group compared with 37% of subjects (13/35) in the > 1.0% metronidazole cream group were rated as having a clear to mild > condition at end point. Both drugs were well tolerated; there was no > significant difference in the number of drug-related adverse events between > the two agents. > > Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of erythema is > between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as mild/cleared at the > end? Anyway, I have probably come close to a 25% or so improvement in > redness using Noritate, so that seems about right, but I certainly wouldnt > consider that clearance.. > > > > > > -- > Please read the list highlights before posting to the whole group (http://rosacea.ii.net/toc.html). Your post will be delayed if you don't give a meaningful subject or trim your reply text. You must change the subject when replying to a digest ! > > See http://www.drnase.com for info on his recently published book. > > To leave the list send an email to rosacea-support-unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 > Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of > erythema is between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as > mild/cleared at the end? Adam, the numbers add up. The study's definition of rosacea includes both inflammatory lesions and erythema. The 26-30% clearing refers to just the erythema in that group, not improvement in general. (Antibiotics are most effective on rosacean skin that is inflammed.) If you're interested, I commented on this study a few weeks back in this group. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 > Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of > erythema is between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as > mild/cleared at the end? Adam, the numbers add up. The study's definition of rosacea includes both inflammatory lesions and erythema. The 26-30% clearing refers to just the erythema in that group, not improvement in general. (Antibiotics are most effective on rosacean skin that is inflammed.) If you're interested, I commented on this study a few weeks back in this group. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2002 Report Share Posted April 6, 2002 > Somehow these numbers dont add up. The average clearance of > erythema is between 26-30% yet 57-37% of the patients were rated as > mild/cleared at the end? Adam, the numbers add up. The study's definition of rosacea includes both inflammatory lesions and erythema. The 26-30% clearing refers to just the erythema in that group, not improvement in general. (Antibiotics are most effective on rosacean skin that is inflammed.) If you're interested, I commented on this study a few weeks back in this group. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.