Guest guest Posted June 15, 2002 Report Share Posted June 15, 2002 Maybe we should start to think of rosacea as being part of a larger family of disorders, or perhaps even a particular manifestation of one disorder. There are often problems in diagnosing rosacea because of the overlap of symptoms with other conditions; and of course, there are those of us who suffer from more than one condition simultaneously. More than this, when I began to suffer from acne at age 15, there was the chance that is would disappear after puberty. There was also the chance that it would continue into my 20s, 30s, 40s,.... But was there not also the chance that it could evolve(or trigger) into various other disorders, such as seb. derm. and rosacea. The fact is, we have no coherent explanation for these(this) disease(s). Are they genetic, bacterial or viral in origin? Are they possibly a combination? Our disease ebbs and flows; we find personal triggers which vary and change with time; we have remissions; the disease comes back. A permanent solution is evasive. It is extremely discouraging that we are only at the starting line of understanding--none of us is likely to witness a " breakthrough " in the treatments of these diseases in our lifetimes--we aren't even discussed. Perhaps if we had some Hollywood star champion our cause, there would be interest and money--but that isn't going to happen--rosacea is a very unglamourous disease. I don't want to depress anyone above what the disease depresses us all, but the reality of rosacea is nothing but depressing, Deryk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.