Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 Has anyone heard about new limitations on accutane treatment in the US? A client of mine was told by her derm yesterday that in a few weeks only the most severe acne patients will be allowed to receive accutane. She claims there is an actual cyst requirement ( a number) you have to meet so she won't be able to use it on as many people as she'd like to any more. Does this affect the low dose treatment for rosacea or the just the regular strength acne vulgaris treatment? Jana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why accutane is being restricted. It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why accutane is being restricted. It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why accutane is being restricted. It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 everyone can read about the dumb S.M.A.R.T. program at roche's website or the fda website. basically, a prescriber must certify he understands that women should be on two forms of contraception, etc., has some sort of clue about how to treat acne, and send in for some yellow stickers. these stickers certify for females that she had the requisite number of pregnancy tests, saw the roche video, and is certified to have her rx filled. males get the same yellow sticker but a box marked male is checked. rx must be filled within 7 days of date of yellow sticker certification -- and only for a one month supply. anyone can still be prescribed accutane, off label uses included, but the real onersome burden is you cannot presribe refills, phone in rx, and the written rx must have the yellow sticker. I'm am guessing a lot of low dose accutane patients may get a rx for accutane 10 mg, quantity 40, sig one capsule qid, of which the pharmacist may or not meddle. otherwise everyone not using something like europharmacy.com which sells 30 roaccutane 10mg for less than 20 euros (less than 20 us dollars at the conversion rate) will have to be making their way in to a dermatologist every month. btw, roche, located in switzerland, sells roaccutane much much less in europe, mexico, and canada than it does in the usa!! the conspiracy theory is now that roche's patent for accutane expired, in order to make it so onerous for a generic company to get the massive usa market, they started this SMART program under the guise of teratogenic prevention (wonder why they waited over 20 years -- if teratogenic effects bothered them this much) and so they won't get sued in the USA, and to make it impossible for another pharmacutical company to market accutane in the usa and take away all that money they're storing in their secret numbered swiss accounts after funneling it back to switzerland after finding some loophole in order not to pay/write off any us taxes they owe to the irs... btw, if you can walk across the border to mexico, you can bring back a 90 d supply of accutane rx free, no questions asked. > Has anyone heard about new limitations on accutane treatment in the US? A > client of mine was told by her derm yesterday that in a few weeks only the > most severe acne patients will be allowed to receive accutane. She claims > there is an actual cyst requirement ( a number) you have to meet so she won't this is bogus. chalk this right up there with the dermatologist who didn't know what minocyline was. maybe we should compile a book of acutal sayings from stupid dermatologists. > be able to use it on as many people as she'd like to any more. Does this > affect the low dose treatment for rosacea or the just the regular strength > acne vulgaris treatment? > > Jana > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 everyone can read about the dumb S.M.A.R.T. program at roche's website or the fda website. basically, a prescriber must certify he understands that women should be on two forms of contraception, etc., has some sort of clue about how to treat acne, and send in for some yellow stickers. these stickers certify for females that she had the requisite number of pregnancy tests, saw the roche video, and is certified to have her rx filled. males get the same yellow sticker but a box marked male is checked. rx must be filled within 7 days of date of yellow sticker certification -- and only for a one month supply. anyone can still be prescribed accutane, off label uses included, but the real onersome burden is you cannot presribe refills, phone in rx, and the written rx must have the yellow sticker. I'm am guessing a lot of low dose accutane patients may get a rx for accutane 10 mg, quantity 40, sig one capsule qid, of which the pharmacist may or not meddle. otherwise everyone not using something like europharmacy.com which sells 30 roaccutane 10mg for less than 20 euros (less than 20 us dollars at the conversion rate) will have to be making their way in to a dermatologist every month. btw, roche, located in switzerland, sells roaccutane much much less in europe, mexico, and canada than it does in the usa!! the conspiracy theory is now that roche's patent for accutane expired, in order to make it so onerous for a generic company to get the massive usa market, they started this SMART program under the guise of teratogenic prevention (wonder why they waited over 20 years -- if teratogenic effects bothered them this much) and so they won't get sued in the USA, and to make it impossible for another pharmacutical company to market accutane in the usa and take away all that money they're storing in their secret numbered swiss accounts after funneling it back to switzerland after finding some loophole in order not to pay/write off any us taxes they owe to the irs... btw, if you can walk across the border to mexico, you can bring back a 90 d supply of accutane rx free, no questions asked. > Has anyone heard about new limitations on accutane treatment in the US? A > client of mine was told by her derm yesterday that in a few weeks only the > most severe acne patients will be allowed to receive accutane. She claims > there is an actual cyst requirement ( a number) you have to meet so she won't this is bogus. chalk this right up there with the dermatologist who didn't know what minocyline was. maybe we should compile a book of acutal sayings from stupid dermatologists. > be able to use it on as many people as she'd like to any more. Does this > affect the low dose treatment for rosacea or the just the regular strength > acne vulgaris treatment? > > Jana > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 everyone can read about the dumb S.M.A.R.T. program at roche's website or the fda website. basically, a prescriber must certify he understands that women should be on two forms of contraception, etc., has some sort of clue about how to treat acne, and send in for some yellow stickers. these stickers certify for females that she had the requisite number of pregnancy tests, saw the roche video, and is certified to have her rx filled. males get the same yellow sticker but a box marked male is checked. rx must be filled within 7 days of date of yellow sticker certification -- and only for a one month supply. anyone can still be prescribed accutane, off label uses included, but the real onersome burden is you cannot presribe refills, phone in rx, and the written rx must have the yellow sticker. I'm am guessing a lot of low dose accutane patients may get a rx for accutane 10 mg, quantity 40, sig one capsule qid, of which the pharmacist may or not meddle. otherwise everyone not using something like europharmacy.com which sells 30 roaccutane 10mg for less than 20 euros (less than 20 us dollars at the conversion rate) will have to be making their way in to a dermatologist every month. btw, roche, located in switzerland, sells roaccutane much much less in europe, mexico, and canada than it does in the usa!! the conspiracy theory is now that roche's patent for accutane expired, in order to make it so onerous for a generic company to get the massive usa market, they started this SMART program under the guise of teratogenic prevention (wonder why they waited over 20 years -- if teratogenic effects bothered them this much) and so they won't get sued in the USA, and to make it impossible for another pharmacutical company to market accutane in the usa and take away all that money they're storing in their secret numbered swiss accounts after funneling it back to switzerland after finding some loophole in order not to pay/write off any us taxes they owe to the irs... btw, if you can walk across the border to mexico, you can bring back a 90 d supply of accutane rx free, no questions asked. > Has anyone heard about new limitations on accutane treatment in the US? A > client of mine was told by her derm yesterday that in a few weeks only the > most severe acne patients will be allowed to receive accutane. She claims > there is an actual cyst requirement ( a number) you have to meet so she won't this is bogus. chalk this right up there with the dermatologist who didn't know what minocyline was. maybe we should compile a book of acutal sayings from stupid dermatologists. > be able to use it on as many people as she'd like to any more. Does this > affect the low dose treatment for rosacea or the just the regular strength > acne vulgaris treatment? > > Jana > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 you don't need any lab work for doses of 10 mg/d. you have more likelihood of abnormal values by being on full dose minoycline and you don't need lab work for being on full dose minocyline. odds are that if you have abnormal lab parameters while on minocin 100 mg bid, you will normalize if you switch to accutan 10 mg qd and your rosacea will improve, provided you cut ALL topicals! important to note that if you are female, you MUST know how to prevent pregnancy and be on two forms of birth control. cynics aside, one would be incorrect to assume that having severe inflammatory rosacea is a form of birth control -- even though it may seriously impact your dating opportunities... that being said, anyone on the .5 - 1 mg/kg/d and over, definately needs what is recommended by roche. per the NEW package insert: lipids pre accutane and then at 4 wks, more with pts with obesity, diabets, etoh, metabolic disorder, etc liver function tests pre accutane and then biweekly until response has been established glucose, cpk, CBC, monthly or so but mainly they care (to protect themselves, remember a deformed baby is worth more in court than a patient with a bad pancreas) about sensitive urine/serum monthly preg tests for female pts. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 you don't need any lab work for doses of 10 mg/d. you have more likelihood of abnormal values by being on full dose minoycline and you don't need lab work for being on full dose minocyline. odds are that if you have abnormal lab parameters while on minocin 100 mg bid, you will normalize if you switch to accutan 10 mg qd and your rosacea will improve, provided you cut ALL topicals! important to note that if you are female, you MUST know how to prevent pregnancy and be on two forms of birth control. cynics aside, one would be incorrect to assume that having severe inflammatory rosacea is a form of birth control -- even though it may seriously impact your dating opportunities... that being said, anyone on the .5 - 1 mg/kg/d and over, definately needs what is recommended by roche. per the NEW package insert: lipids pre accutane and then at 4 wks, more with pts with obesity, diabets, etoh, metabolic disorder, etc liver function tests pre accutane and then biweekly until response has been established glucose, cpk, CBC, monthly or so but mainly they care (to protect themselves, remember a deformed baby is worth more in court than a patient with a bad pancreas) about sensitive urine/serum monthly preg tests for female pts. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 you don't need any lab work for doses of 10 mg/d. you have more likelihood of abnormal values by being on full dose minoycline and you don't need lab work for being on full dose minocyline. odds are that if you have abnormal lab parameters while on minocin 100 mg bid, you will normalize if you switch to accutan 10 mg qd and your rosacea will improve, provided you cut ALL topicals! important to note that if you are female, you MUST know how to prevent pregnancy and be on two forms of birth control. cynics aside, one would be incorrect to assume that having severe inflammatory rosacea is a form of birth control -- even though it may seriously impact your dating opportunities... that being said, anyone on the .5 - 1 mg/kg/d and over, definately needs what is recommended by roche. per the NEW package insert: lipids pre accutane and then at 4 wks, more with pts with obesity, diabets, etoh, metabolic disorder, etc liver function tests pre accutane and then biweekly until response has been established glucose, cpk, CBC, monthly or so but mainly they care (to protect themselves, remember a deformed baby is worth more in court than a patient with a bad pancreas) about sensitive urine/serum monthly preg tests for female pts. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I am not the biggest Accutane advocate on the planet. I question whether Accutane usage from what I now believe was pre-rosacea actually led to a severe case of rosacea down the road. Having said that, from what I understand, there is little evidence to support Accutane as a cause of severe depression or suicidal ideation. Bear in mind, the vast majority of Accutane users are adolescents and young adults. I believe the *overall* suicide rate is highest among this age group to begin with and, from what I've read on the subject, the suicide rate among Accutane users in that age group is actually lower than that of non-users in the same age group. I really believe there is a bit of media hysteria here brought on and possibly funded by the fierce competition in the pharmaceutical industry and politicians seeking pet causes to advance their careers. I hate to sound cynical, but my experience with this condition, coupled with some insight into the NRS/Galderma relationship has really changed my perception of the industry. As there are medical studies that support the usage of low dose accutane for some rosacea sufferers, I hate to see the FDA eliminate this as a treatment option for us when we have so few options in the first place. It may not be a medicine I would choose, but I hate to take away anyone's option to use it should they wish to do so. Informed consent should be the rule of law IMO. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I am not the biggest Accutane advocate on the planet. I question whether Accutane usage from what I now believe was pre-rosacea actually led to a severe case of rosacea down the road. Having said that, from what I understand, there is little evidence to support Accutane as a cause of severe depression or suicidal ideation. Bear in mind, the vast majority of Accutane users are adolescents and young adults. I believe the *overall* suicide rate is highest among this age group to begin with and, from what I've read on the subject, the suicide rate among Accutane users in that age group is actually lower than that of non-users in the same age group. I really believe there is a bit of media hysteria here brought on and possibly funded by the fierce competition in the pharmaceutical industry and politicians seeking pet causes to advance their careers. I hate to sound cynical, but my experience with this condition, coupled with some insight into the NRS/Galderma relationship has really changed my perception of the industry. As there are medical studies that support the usage of low dose accutane for some rosacea sufferers, I hate to see the FDA eliminate this as a treatment option for us when we have so few options in the first place. It may not be a medicine I would choose, but I hate to take away anyone's option to use it should they wish to do so. Informed consent should be the rule of law IMO. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 I am not the biggest Accutane advocate on the planet. I question whether Accutane usage from what I now believe was pre-rosacea actually led to a severe case of rosacea down the road. Having said that, from what I understand, there is little evidence to support Accutane as a cause of severe depression or suicidal ideation. Bear in mind, the vast majority of Accutane users are adolescents and young adults. I believe the *overall* suicide rate is highest among this age group to begin with and, from what I've read on the subject, the suicide rate among Accutane users in that age group is actually lower than that of non-users in the same age group. I really believe there is a bit of media hysteria here brought on and possibly funded by the fierce competition in the pharmaceutical industry and politicians seeking pet causes to advance their careers. I hate to sound cynical, but my experience with this condition, coupled with some insight into the NRS/Galderma relationship has really changed my perception of the industry. As there are medical studies that support the usage of low dose accutane for some rosacea sufferers, I hate to see the FDA eliminate this as a treatment option for us when we have so few options in the first place. It may not be a medicine I would choose, but I hate to take away anyone's option to use it should they wish to do so. Informed consent should be the rule of law IMO. > I'll be the first to admit that I am NOT an expert on the subject, but I > don't think thats entirely accurate. I am pretty sure that accutane has > lead to several deaths. A few people on it actually committed suicide > because it caused really bad depression. In low doses used for cea, the > potential for side effects is much lower than in these high doses, but > Accutane does have alot of dangerous side effects (Although I am completely > unclear as to whether or not any of these pose a significant risk at low > enough doses, maybe they dont) and the side effects are probably why > accutane is being restricted. > > It seems to have SO many benefits for all sorts of different skin disorders, > but its not candy or anything. I dont think its safe to buy online. You > should be having monthly? tests for either your kidneys or liver (I cant > remember which one Accutane might damage... but I know its a risk for one of > them) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.