Guest guest Posted March 11, 2002 Report Share Posted March 11, 2002 I was watching PBS on Sunday and stumbled across Dr. Perricone's special again promoting his book. I usually watch it for a few minutes here and there if its a part I hadn't seen before. This time the part I watched talked about topicals and supplements for the skin. I understand what he is lecturing about really is to delay the aging process, but a lot of the points he was making seem geared towards anyone concerned with taking care of their skin (especially facial skin). 1) One important statement he made that stood out to me was that when you eat a diet that causes an anti-inflammatory reaction in the body, the reaction will express itself as redness/ruddiness, so therefore, do not eat/drink/expose your self to things that will cause that reaction. When you go to his website and read, you can see he believes in eating a low-glycemic diet whenever possible. He also stated when you eat a diet loaded with bad carbs (especially before bed-like ice cream, sweets, etc.), these carbs promote swelling/puffiness/edema in the morning-and doing this prevents a hormone (forgive me-I forget which one) from helping to heal and regenerate your skin overnight. This is medical/scientific confirmation for those of us who have found this out by trial and error. 2) He stated there were 3 supplements that can help heal your skin and take inflammation away " Vitamin C Ester " , " DMAE Liquid " , and " Alpha Lipoic Acid " . These supplements have been discussed here on the board already, but the reason I am bringing this up is because during the fund raising break on PBS, they were answering questions from viewers live, and a viewer asked if there was a difference between " Vitamin C Ester " and " Ester C " . He emphatically stated " Yes there is!!!! For your skin you only want to take " Vitamin C Ester " . So this prompted me to look on the internet to understand the difference, because I think alot of us on the board are using " Ester C " , and maybe we are using the wrong one. I couldn't find much but I found a link to a company that sells (sorry!-but its a start, maybe someone can find more informational links) the supplements that Dr. Perricone promotes for healthy skin, and they have an explanation on the difference here: http://www.intensivenutrition.com/newinformationonskincare.htm. So now I am thinking, maybe this is why some of us do not get the results we expect or hope for, because maybe we are using the wrong form of Vitamin C. I will definitely be researching this topic some more. He did discuss the importance of " Vitamin C Ester " , " DMAE Liquid " , and " Alpha Lipoic Acid " at length and why each one was important in healing skin. He also did mention that when Alpha Lipoic Acid lotion is applied to the skin, within an hour swelling and puffiness dramatically reduce. Here's his site, there's some info to read amongst the items for sale. I guess his book has all the details. http://www.thewrinklecure.com/ Well, I just wanted to mention these two points, I might be clutching at straws, but I definitely think its food for thought; and maybe Dr. Perricone's research (albeit a good way to make money for himself) can benefit those who suffer from rosacea. (I apologize btw, for being too long, and repeating anything here that you may know already! just wanted to share). Thanks, Cheryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2002 Report Share Posted March 11, 2002 Perricone is the only derm that sells Vit C Ester.--strange huh? Had a long talk with my nutrionist at local health store about that. Second, one site, either skinrx.com or skincarerx. com, stopped handling his products, specifically the one topical with ALA for redness, the one indicated for rosacea, citing that they uncovered a number of lies in the way he manufactures the product. Something about a synthetic chemical he was using in the product, when he had said it was natural. I cannot remember the details, but they are listed on one of the above sites. But it must have been pretty serious for them to stop promoting his products. Note: forwarded message attached. MARIE --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2002 Report Share Posted March 13, 2002 A few days ago Carol wrote: > ...the reason I am bringing this up is because > during the fund raising break on PBS, they were answering questions > from viewers live, and a viewer asked if there was a difference > between " Vitamin C Ester " and " Ester C " . He emphatically > stated " Yes there is!!!! For your skin you only want to > take " Vitamin C Ester " . > So this prompted me to look on the internet to understand the > difference, because I think alot of us on the board are > using " Ester C " , and maybe we are using the wrong one. > I couldn't find much but... ... > now I am thinking, maybe this is why some of us do not get the > results we expect or hope for, because maybe we are using the wrong > form of Vitamin C... I'm a new poster, and as a rosacea sufferer I appreciate this group. In response to Carol and I believe other posters regarding the various formulations of Vitamin C in skin care products: Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, is comprised of l-ascorbic acid and d-ascorbic acid. It was shown (at Duke?) that when l-ascorbic acid is taken up by skin cells a number of favorable things happen, including increased collagen production and protection against UV damage. I don't know if these results are universally regarded as relevant or clinically applicable, but I believe the theory and original research is considered solid, reproducible work. One problem is its practical application. Relatively high concentrations of l-ascorbic acid are needed, which irritates normal skin -- lower concentrations are gentler to the skin, but ineffective. Also, l-ascorbic acid in solution is chemically unstable, becoming useless in a week or two. So skin care companies couple l-ascorbic acid with various molecules in an attempt to decrease the skin irritation and increase the shelf life, with limited success. Esterification changes an acid molecule into a pH neutral molecule, so esterification of l-ascorbic acid would be expected to give a more stable solution with a longer shelf life, that is less irritating to the skin -- which is good news. The big question is whether skin cells can re-convert an estered form back into its acid form, and in high enough concentrations to do any good clinically. A few skin care companies using this gentler, more stable " esterified vitamin C " insist that it is as clinically effective as l-ascorbic acid. There are several chemical formulations of esterified vitamin C, one of which is trademarked Ester-C and used by several companies. I don't know which formulation Dr. Perrione uses, whether there is any significant difference among the various formulations, or -- and this is the key question -- whether any are clinically effective. I also don't know if esterified vitamin C is slang for esterified l- ascorbic acid or includes the useless d-ascorbic acid form as well. Most skin care companies don't believe any of the esterified forms have any real clinical effect, so they continue working with l- ascorbic acid, although not always in the high concentrations considered effective as based on the original studies. That's how I understand it. I haven't looked into this controversy further because it isn't relevant to me professionally (I'm an emergency physician involved with medical computing) or personally (I have mild-moderate rosacea, so I instinctively shy away from applying potentially irritating, collagen-activating products while my skin is inflamed). Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2002 Report Share Posted March 13, 2002 A few days ago Carol wrote: > ...the reason I am bringing this up is because > during the fund raising break on PBS, they were answering questions > from viewers live, and a viewer asked if there was a difference > between " Vitamin C Ester " and " Ester C " . He emphatically > stated " Yes there is!!!! For your skin you only want to > take " Vitamin C Ester " . > So this prompted me to look on the internet to understand the > difference, because I think alot of us on the board are > using " Ester C " , and maybe we are using the wrong one. > I couldn't find much but... ... > now I am thinking, maybe this is why some of us do not get the > results we expect or hope for, because maybe we are using the wrong > form of Vitamin C... I'm a new poster, and as a rosacea sufferer I appreciate this group. In response to Carol and I believe other posters regarding the various formulations of Vitamin C in skin care products: Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, is comprised of l-ascorbic acid and d-ascorbic acid. It was shown (at Duke?) that when l-ascorbic acid is taken up by skin cells a number of favorable things happen, including increased collagen production and protection against UV damage. I don't know if these results are universally regarded as relevant or clinically applicable, but I believe the theory and original research is considered solid, reproducible work. One problem is its practical application. Relatively high concentrations of l-ascorbic acid are needed, which irritates normal skin -- lower concentrations are gentler to the skin, but ineffective. Also, l-ascorbic acid in solution is chemically unstable, becoming useless in a week or two. So skin care companies couple l-ascorbic acid with various molecules in an attempt to decrease the skin irritation and increase the shelf life, with limited success. Esterification changes an acid molecule into a pH neutral molecule, so esterification of l-ascorbic acid would be expected to give a more stable solution with a longer shelf life, that is less irritating to the skin -- which is good news. The big question is whether skin cells can re-convert an estered form back into its acid form, and in high enough concentrations to do any good clinically. A few skin care companies using this gentler, more stable " esterified vitamin C " insist that it is as clinically effective as l-ascorbic acid. There are several chemical formulations of esterified vitamin C, one of which is trademarked Ester-C and used by several companies. I don't know which formulation Dr. Perrione uses, whether there is any significant difference among the various formulations, or -- and this is the key question -- whether any are clinically effective. I also don't know if esterified vitamin C is slang for esterified l- ascorbic acid or includes the useless d-ascorbic acid form as well. Most skin care companies don't believe any of the esterified forms have any real clinical effect, so they continue working with l- ascorbic acid, although not always in the high concentrations considered effective as based on the original studies. That's how I understand it. I haven't looked into this controversy further because it isn't relevant to me professionally (I'm an emergency physician involved with medical computing) or personally (I have mild-moderate rosacea, so I instinctively shy away from applying potentially irritating, collagen-activating products while my skin is inflamed). Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2002 Report Share Posted March 13, 2002 A few days ago Carol wrote: > ...the reason I am bringing this up is because > during the fund raising break on PBS, they were answering questions > from viewers live, and a viewer asked if there was a difference > between " Vitamin C Ester " and " Ester C " . He emphatically > stated " Yes there is!!!! For your skin you only want to > take " Vitamin C Ester " . > So this prompted me to look on the internet to understand the > difference, because I think alot of us on the board are > using " Ester C " , and maybe we are using the wrong one. > I couldn't find much but... ... > now I am thinking, maybe this is why some of us do not get the > results we expect or hope for, because maybe we are using the wrong > form of Vitamin C... I'm a new poster, and as a rosacea sufferer I appreciate this group. In response to Carol and I believe other posters regarding the various formulations of Vitamin C in skin care products: Vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, is comprised of l-ascorbic acid and d-ascorbic acid. It was shown (at Duke?) that when l-ascorbic acid is taken up by skin cells a number of favorable things happen, including increased collagen production and protection against UV damage. I don't know if these results are universally regarded as relevant or clinically applicable, but I believe the theory and original research is considered solid, reproducible work. One problem is its practical application. Relatively high concentrations of l-ascorbic acid are needed, which irritates normal skin -- lower concentrations are gentler to the skin, but ineffective. Also, l-ascorbic acid in solution is chemically unstable, becoming useless in a week or two. So skin care companies couple l-ascorbic acid with various molecules in an attempt to decrease the skin irritation and increase the shelf life, with limited success. Esterification changes an acid molecule into a pH neutral molecule, so esterification of l-ascorbic acid would be expected to give a more stable solution with a longer shelf life, that is less irritating to the skin -- which is good news. The big question is whether skin cells can re-convert an estered form back into its acid form, and in high enough concentrations to do any good clinically. A few skin care companies using this gentler, more stable " esterified vitamin C " insist that it is as clinically effective as l-ascorbic acid. There are several chemical formulations of esterified vitamin C, one of which is trademarked Ester-C and used by several companies. I don't know which formulation Dr. Perrione uses, whether there is any significant difference among the various formulations, or -- and this is the key question -- whether any are clinically effective. I also don't know if esterified vitamin C is slang for esterified l- ascorbic acid or includes the useless d-ascorbic acid form as well. Most skin care companies don't believe any of the esterified forms have any real clinical effect, so they continue working with l- ascorbic acid, although not always in the high concentrations considered effective as based on the original studies. That's how I understand it. I haven't looked into this controversy further because it isn't relevant to me professionally (I'm an emergency physician involved with medical computing) or personally (I have mild-moderate rosacea, so I instinctively shy away from applying potentially irritating, collagen-activating products while my skin is inflamed). Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.