Guest guest Posted April 26, 2002 Report Share Posted April 26, 2002 New v-beam study related to PWS, but very applicable to treatment of facial vessels in rosacea. One of the more technical papers I've seen on this subject. URL and abstract below. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11870797&dopt=Abstract Lasers Surg Med 2002;30(2):160-9 Vascular response to laser photothermolysis as a function of pulse duration, vessel type, and diameter: Implications for port wine stain laser therapy. Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Cao D, Hammer- MJ, JS. Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, California 92612. Background and Objective Treatment of port wine stains (PWS) by photothermolysis can be improved by optimizing laser parameters on an individual patient basis. We have studied the critical role of pulse duration (t(p)) on the treatment efficacy. Study Design/Materials and Methods The V-beam laser (Candela) allowed changing t(p) over user- specified discrete values between 1.5 and 40 milliseconds by delivering a series of 100 microsecond spikes. For the 1.5 and 3 millisecond pulses, three spikes were observed at intervals t(p)/2 and for t(p)[?]greater-than-or-equal[?]6 milliseconds, four spikes separated by t(p)/3. The ScleroPlus laser (Candela) has a smooth output over its fixed 1.5 milliseconds duration. Blood vessels in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) were irradiated at fixed wavelength (595 nm), spot size (7 mm), radiant exposure (15 Jcm(minus sign2)), and at variable t(p). The CAM contains an extensive microvascular network ranging from capillaries with diameter D[?]<[?] 30 mum to blood vessels of D[?]approximate[?]120 mum. The CAM assay allows real-time video documentation, and observation of blood flow in pre-capillary arterioles (A) and post-capillary venules (V). Vessel injury was graded from recorded videotapes. Mathematical modeling was developed to interpret results of vessel injury when varying t(p) and D. A modified thermal relaxation time was introduced to calculate vessel wall temperature following laser exposure. RESULTS: Arterioles. For increasing t(p), overall damage was found to decrease. For fixed t(p), damage decreased with vessel size. Venules. For all D, damage was smaller than for corresponding arterioles. There was no dependence of damage on t(p). For given t(p), no variation of damage with D was observed. Photothermolysis due to spiked (V-beam) vs. smooth (Scleroplus) delivery of laser energy at fixed t(p) (1.5 milliseconds), showed similar vessel injuries for al values of D (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The difference between initial arteriole and venule damage could be explained by the threefold higher absorption coefficient at 595 nm in (oxygen-poor!) arterioles. In human patients, PWS consist of ectatic venules (characterized by higher absorption), so that these considerations favor the use of 595- nm irradiation for laser photothermolysis. For optimal treatment of PWS it is proposed that t(p) be between 0.1 and 1.5 milliseconds. This is based on a modified relaxation time tau(d)prime prime or minute, defined as the time required for heat conduction into the full thickness of the vessel wall, which is assumed to have a thickness DeltaD approximate[?]0.1D. The corresponding tau(d)prime prime or minute will be a factor of about six smaller than given in the literature. For vessels with D between 30 and 300 mum, tau(d) prime prime or minute ranges from 0.1 to 1.5 milliseconds. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.