Guest guest Posted December 24, 2002 Report Share Posted December 24, 2002 Debbie, You bring up a point I have pondered many times. I have had documented cases of acute pancreatitis. I've also had times when the panc enzymes were normal but the liver enzymes were up to 30 times the normal limit. Then I've had times when the labs were totally unremarkable. The pain feels the same to me no matter what the labs show. In fact, some of the worst episodes I've had (in regard to pain, nausea, and vomiting) have been with totally normal labs. Typically, my mind works in a very logical fashion. (my undergrad degree is in math/education) I try to find a logical explanation for even the strangest things in life. For the life of me, it just does not make sense that I would have documented cases of acute panc and then have the exact same pain (with normal labs) that is totally unrelated to whatever is causing the pancreatitis. I mean, to me, it would seem bizaar that I would have acute panc and something totally unrelated cause the exact same pain and symptoms. Also, if not for something related to an improperly functioning pancreas, why would I begin to develop problems with my blood sugar going too high and too low (don't want to call it diabetes at this time!) after losing 100 lbs and also 2 months after the return of the acute panc attacks? I've had one general surgeon refer me to Vanderbilt (in Nashville, TN) with a diagnosis of chronic panc. The general surgeon that just recently did my hernia(s) repair and looked for adhesions in the area of the panc and bile duct told me that his guess on the blood sugar problems would be that my panc has sustained damage and no longer functions properly. Am I missing something or is this basically another way of saying I have the beginnings of chronic panc despite the fact that on film the panc looks fine? I'm really not trying to diagnose myself. (okay, maybe I am) Mostly, I'm just trying to find an answer for the somewhat bizaar things I have going on with my health. Add to the mix, the fact that I have systemic lupus and my rheumie told me she believes the acute panc is related to the lupus. This was 2 weeks prior to the return of the acute panc attacks. At the time I saw her, I was having no problems at all and had almost forgotten my history of acute panc. W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.