Guest guest Posted September 12, 2002 Report Share Posted September 12, 2002 I have been reading all the PET Scan information and have decided to put in my two cents. Here goes: I would never tell anyone not to have the scan done, not to consider having it done and I would never discourage anyone from looking into having it done. Just because someone else chose to have a PET scan and another person made the decision not too should not be considered. Pam is on the right track in sharing information about the tests and what they might be able to do for us, Deborah is on the right track in sharing information about the tests and what they might be able to do for us. Informed decisions are always the best decisions. The cost of the test, whether your insurance will pay, the length of the test, how hard the scan table is, how exhausted you are, how frustrated you are because of lack of dx., how far you would need to travel, should be the personal things you consider and should be questions you ask of your physician and of yourself when making an informed decision. New technology, new uses of old technology and future technology will cause us to make decisions today quite different than those made by persons in the past, even the recent past. To say that someone two years ago decided against a technology because it was not definitive or proven is a foolish reason for you to not consider it today. To say that it is still not definitive or proven is also a foolish reason not to have it done. I only hope that by having a PET Scan at North Shore Hospital three years ago, for an MSA diagnosis, my husband helped the doctors that are reading scans today. When people tell you there is no hope, there is no cure, there is no definitive dx until death then I believe we must all embrace the latest technology in hopes of not only helping ourselves but of helping others years down the road. A pioneer leads the way for others and by doing so may also help himself....we need leaders. We need people to step forward if they can and be pioneers of new technology. I am a breast cancer survivor because some brave women years ago agreed to procedures that were not proven and not definitive. So if you can tolerate, afford and want a test done, go for it. If you can not afford it, fight to make it happen. Maybe two years from now it will be a proven test, you will still be alive and you will benefit from your own past scan. And maybe you won't be here and maybe it won't be proven or definitive but what do you have to lose? If you are too tired, in too much pain, can't afford it or simply don't want to do it than cheer on those that do, don't discourage them. Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2002 Report Share Posted September 13, 2002 Dear Jan. AMEN. You have expressed it perfectly. The PET scans have been available for a long time, and each patient should make the decision as to its value for himself with the help of his physician. Our Neurologist discussed it with us years ago, and I attended a very informative workshop showing what they can do. We decided that we didn't need it because the treatment we were doing was working very well. However, Ken's SMA diagnosis was not confirmed on autopsy, and I sometimes wish we had followed through with the PET scan. It would have made no real difference in the treatment Ken received, however. What has concerned me in this discussion here is how few of the people have been told about this by their physicians. Our doctor felt it was her obligation to let us know of all options although she did not seem to think it would be very helpful for Ken. As I said earlier, I think it is totally irresponsible for a doctor to perform surgery without suggesting a PET scan first. Barbara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2002 Report Share Posted September 13, 2002 Thanks Jan, these are very wise words. More Scan Opinions I have been reading all the PET Scan information and have decided to put in my two cents. Here goes: I would never tell anyone not to have the scan done, not to consider having it done and I would never discourage anyone from looking into having it done. Just because someone else chose to have a PET scan and another person made the decision not too should not be considered. Pam is on the right track in sharing information about the tests and what they might be able to do for us, Deborah is on the right track in sharing information about the tests and what they might be able to do for us. Informed decisions are always the best decisions. The cost of the test, whether your insurance will pay, the length of the test, how hard the scan table is, how exhausted you are, how frustrated you are because of lack of dx., how far you would need to travel, should be the personal things you consider and should be questions you ask of your physician and of yourself when making an informed decision. New technology, new uses of old technology and future technology will cause us to make decisions today quite different than those made by persons in the past, even the recent past. To say that someone two years ago decided against a technology because it was not definitive or proven is a foolish reason for you to not consider it today. To say that it is still not definitive or proven is also a foolish reason not to have it done. I only hope that by having a PET Scan at North Shore Hospital three years ago, for an MSA diagnosis, my husband helped the doctors that are reading scans today. When people tell you there is no hope, there is no cure, there is no definitive dx until death then I believe we must all embrace the latest technology in hopes of not only helping ourselves but of helping others years down the road. A pioneer leads the way for others and by doing so may also help himself....we need leaders. We need people to step forward if they can and be pioneers of new technology. I am a breast cancer survivor because some brave women years ago agreed to procedures that were not proven and not definitive. So if you can tolerate, afford and want a test done, go for it. If you can not afford it, fight to make it happen. Maybe two years from now it will be a proven test, you will still be alive and you will benefit from your own past scan. And maybe you won't be here and maybe it won't be proven or definitive but what do you have to lose? If you are too tired, in too much pain, can't afford it or simply don't want to do it than cheer on those that do, don't discourage them. Jan If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may unsubscribe by sending a blank email to shydrager-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2002 Report Share Posted September 13, 2002 Barbara, Thanks for your comment. Just for all concerned, Deb asked Dr. Jankovic, Dr Raad, Dr Rao, Dr Demis, and Dr Tatter and the response was, " Oh, I dont need a PET SCAN, We have all your MRI " S and that is all I need " ........Yeah Right !!!!!! >From: kmcrae@... >Reply-To: shydrager >To: shydrager >Subject: Re: More Scan Opinions >Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:50:54 EDT > >Dear Jan. > AMEN. You have expressed it perfectly. The PET scans have been >available for a long time, and each patient should make the decision as to >its value for himself with the help of his physician. Our Neurologist >discussed it with us years ago, and I attended a very informative workshop >showing what they can do. We decided that we didn't need it because the >treatment we were doing was working very well. However, Ken's SMA diagnosis >was not confirmed on autopsy, and I sometimes wish we had followed through >with the PET scan. It would have made no real difference in the treatment >Ken >received, however. What has concerned me in this discussion here is how few >of the people have been told about this by their physicians. Our doctor >felt >it was her obligation to let us know of all options although she did not >seem >to think it would be very helpful for Ken. As I said earlier, I think it is >totally irresponsible for a doctor to perform surgery without suggesting a >PET scan first. > Barbara > >If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may >unsubscribe by sending a blank email to > >shydrager-unsubscribe > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 15, 2002 Report Share Posted September 15, 2002 ************* AMEN ******************************************* I think you said it well Jan, Knowledge and Choice , Thats what it is all about. With out it, where are you. > >Reply-To: shydrager >To: shydrager >Subject: More Scan Opinions >Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 05:19:34 -0000 > >I have been reading all the PET Scan information and have decided to >put in my two cents. Here goes: I would never tell anyone not to >have the scan done, not to consider having it done and I would never >discourage anyone from looking into having it done. Just because >someone else chose to have a PET scan and another person made the >decision not too should not be considered. Pam is on the right track >in sharing information about the tests and what they might be able to >do for us, Deborah is on the right track in sharing information about >the tests and what they might be able to do for us. Informed >decisions are always the best decisions. The cost of the test, >whether your insurance will pay, the length of the test, how hard the >scan table is, how exhausted you are, how frustrated you are because >of lack of dx., how far you would need to travel, should be the >personal things you consider and should be questions you ask of your >physician and of yourself when making an informed decision. > >New technology, new uses of old technology and future technology will >cause us to make decisions today quite different than those made by >persons in the past, even the recent past. To say that someone two >years ago decided against a technology because it was not definitive >or proven is a foolish reason for you to not consider it today. To >say that it is still not definitive or proven is also a foolish >reason not to have it done. I only hope that by having a PET Scan at >North Shore Hospital three years ago, for an MSA diagnosis, my >husband helped the doctors that are reading scans today. When people >tell you there is no hope, there is no cure, there is no definitive >dx until death then I believe we must all embrace the latest >technology in hopes of not only helping ourselves but of helping >others years down the road. A pioneer leads the way for others and by >doing so may also help himself....we need leaders. We need people to >step forward if they can and be pioneers of new technology. I am a >breast cancer survivor because some brave women years ago agreed to >procedures that were not proven and not definitive. So if you can >tolerate, afford and want a test done, go for it. If you can not >afford it, fight to make it happen. Maybe two years from now it will >be a proven test, you will still be alive and you will benefit from >your own past scan. And maybe you won't be here and maybe it won't be >proven or definitive but what do you have to lose? If you are too >tired, in too much pain, can't afford it or simply don't want to do >it than cheer on those that do, don't discourage them. > >Jan > > >If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may >unsubscribe by sending a blank email to > >shydrager-unsubscribe > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.