Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 Maybe a group like NAAFA would lend some support. In a message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:56:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Stella Sloop serenn@...> writes: << At 10:100 -0400 6/10/01, Di wrote: >In the meantime we should all be >writing to our state legislators. Mental health care has been >revolutionized by state legislation mandating parity in benefits. Why >shouldn't that happen for weight loss? This is one of the most sensible, pro-active suggestions I've seen yet. And be sure to write a real letter, not email, because although emails may be counted (and they aren't always) they rarely come to the attention of the addressee. Even 'real' letters don't always make it to the legislator's desk, but enough of them will get his attention, I guarantee! Go to http://www.house.gov/writerep/ for your representatives' addresses, and http://www.senate.gov/ for the senate; don't forget your state legislators either -- they can make themselves heard as well. --stella ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 Insurance won't pay because (a) it's your own fault and ( it is usually worthless. Health insurance companies still see themselves as casualty companies that pay for unavoidable loss, not maintenance. The fact that they all have " health maintenance organizations " in their names or practices these days hasn't changed their basic thinking, which has been consistent since the biggies were founded around the turn of the last century. They will not pay for anything they think could have been avoided by the individual, or is the result of a character flaw rather than a biological problem. It isn't just weight loss. Until they were hit over the head by legislation, they paid only the most grudging of benefits for mental health or substance abuse. What all three of those things share is the presumption by certain people that none of the three would exist if the affected individual would just show some backbone. Insurance companies also refuse to pay for weight loss treatment on the basis that it is often ineffective or unproven. This actually has a lot of scientific support. We're all here because we've lost hundreds of pounds and gotten them right back. We all know that dieting doesn't work. It is the only medical treatment I can think of that is still pushed by doctors even though even they know it will fail at least 95% of their patients (and when it does it is, again, because we have no backbone, although they call it " willpower " ). Nor do insurance companies want to be stuck paying for all those silly late night TV weight loss products, or health club memberships for everybody. Some of the biggest companies in American business are insurance companies, and their denials are the result of institutional prejudice. It is as difficult to alter that attitude as it is to corner an aircraft carrier. The more WLS there is, the more success people have, the more times it gets written up in the peer reviewed journals, the more hard evidence there will be that they won't be able to ignore. In the meantime we should all be writing to our state legislators. Mental health care has been revolutionized by state legislation mandating parity in benefits. Why shouldn't that happen for weight loss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 At 10:100 -0400 6/10/01, Di wrote: >In the meantime we should all be >writing to our state legislators. Mental health care has been >revolutionized by state legislation mandating parity in benefits. Why >shouldn't that happen for weight loss? This is one of the most sensible, pro-active suggestions I've seen yet. And be sure to write a real letter, not email, because although emails may be counted (and they aren't always) they rarely come to the attention of the addressee. Even 'real' letters don't always make it to the legislator's desk, but enough of them will get his attention, I guarantee! Go to http://www.house.gov/writerep/ for your representatives' addresses, and http://www.senate.gov/ for the senate; don't forget your state legislators either -- they can make themselves heard as well. --stella Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 --- gwen20852@... wrote: > Maybe a group like NAAFA would lend some support. > I seriously doubt that NAAFA would lend support, as they are about accepting themselves and their size, not about finding ways to treat their size as a disorder from which to recover from. Just my opinion __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 > Maybe a group like NAAFA would lend some support. That indeed would be a miracle. NAAFA's agenda is anti-WLS, with their official statement relying mainly on complications from 30-year old surgeries in order to shed it in the worst possible light. Nope, I don't see NAAFA doing anything to make WLS easier anyone, unfortunately. M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 38 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... _________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 That indeed would be a miracle. NAAFA's agenda is anti-WLS, with their official statement relying mainly on complications from 30-year old surgeries in order to shed it in the worst possible light. Nope, I don't see NAAFA doing anything to make WLS easier anyone, unfortunately. They talk about hating fat discrimination for anything. But, you are probably right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2001 Report Share Posted June 10, 2001 ....Except that NAAFA doesn't support WLS.. they feel we are disfuguring ourselves in search of beauty.. they forget the health aspects, I think. Hugs, Liane > >In the meantime we should all be > >writing to our state legislators. Mental health care has been > >revolutionized by state legislation mandating parity in benefits. Why > >shouldn't that happen for weight loss? > > This is one of the most sensible, pro-active suggestions I've seen > yet. And be sure to write a real letter, not email, because although > emails may be counted (and they aren't always) they rarely come to > the attention of the addressee. Even 'real' letters don't always make > it to the legislator's desk, but enough of them will get his > attention, I guarantee! > > Go to http://www.house.gov/writerep/ for your representatives' > addresses, and http://www.senate.gov/ for the senate; don't forget > your state legislators either -- they can make themselves heard as > well. > > --stella > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2001 Report Share Posted June 11, 2001 Boy howdy, do they! When I was young and not in pain, I was willing to be fat and find a way to accept it, make the most of it, wear nice clothes, etc. But that was way before arthritic knees, high blood pressure and diabetes. I wonder if someone has done an age study on the NAFFA members-- bet they're all under 40. Nan E. Liane wrote: Except that NAAFA doesn't support WLS.. they feel we are disfuguring ourselves in search of beauty.. they forget the health aspects, I think. ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2001 Report Share Posted June 13, 2001 Good point Nan! Angel --- Nan Earnheart Leafynan@...> wrote: > > Boy howdy, do they! When I was young and not in > pain, I was willing to > be fat and find a way to accept it, make the most of > it, wear nice > clothes, etc. But that was way before arthritic > knees, high blood > pressure and diabetes. I wonder if someone has done > an age study on the > NAFFA members-- bet they're all under 40. Nan E. > > > > Liane wrote: > Except that NAAFA doesn't support WLS.. they feel we > are > disfuguring ourselves in search of beauty.. they > forget the health > aspects, I think. > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for > less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.