THE UGLY HEAD OF CENSORSHIP!

[Guest guest]

There is no point in attacking you personally. The attack is not on you,

, it is upon your proclivity for censorship yet another time. In

case you haven't noticed, censorship hasn't even enabled you to control the

Deb vs. Dr. Ren discussion which continues, as it should, to be an issue

discussed in this group.

Censorship is a BAD, BAD thing, . Divorce yourself from it.

Nick in Sage

Re: rny.....ds....BRIAN...AND THOSE W/SENSE OF

HUMOR

>

> > ( - Is car talk okay " by the rules? " After all, these cars

> > are metaphors for WLS procedures.)

>

> Nick, what is the point of this type of attack on me?

>

>

>

>

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

>

[Guest guest]

Get off your high horse, Nick. I have never censored anyone yet. Read

my other message and please get a clue!

> > > ( - Is car talk okay " by the rules? " After all, these

cars

> > > are metaphors for WLS procedures.)

> >

> > Nick, what is the point of this type of attack on me?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------

----

> >

[Guest guest]

- Let me just thank you for all your contributions. I really wish

that people would e-mail privately if thwey have problems with a person. You

have nothing to feel badly about and it is getting exhausting to listen to

the fights and negatives on this list. Eventually, everyone will find a new

positive list . This is getting frustrating and it is w waste of time.

Ellen(Pam

[Guest guest]

Nick, please relax. You are over reacting. I, for one, am grateful that someone takes the time to keep things in order. You have stated your case more than once and now lets move on to DS related topics. You have great things to say and I look forward to reading it all.

Sheryle

[Guest guest]

Censorship? Hmmmmm. Seems to me that your post that initiated this is the

camel with it's hairy little nose coming right into the tent. You may

recall, according to the story, that the camel continued right on in and

occupied the tent.

Are you saying that your invocation of your " rules " was not a veiled attempt

to censor or, at least the precursor of censorship?

If you can honestly answer " no " I will not again mention this issue unless

it once again crops up in another situation.

Nick in Sage

Re: THE UGLY HEAD OF CENSORSHIP!

> Get off your high horse, Nick. I have never censored anyone yet. Read

> my other message and please get a clue!

>

>

>

>

> > > > ( - Is car talk okay " by the rules? " After all, these

> cars

> > > > are metaphors for WLS procedures.)

> > >

> > > Nick, what is the point of this type of attack on me?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----

> > >

[Guest guest]

I can honestly answer no, Nick. Again, please consider the context in

which I made my initial request.

> > > > > ( - Is car talk okay " by the rules? " After all,

these

> > cars

> > > > > are metaphors for WLS procedures.)

> > > >

> > > > Nick, what is the point of this type of attack on me?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------

----

> > ----

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Nick

get a grip. What makes you such an authority. I am really getting tired of

the bickering on this group. I am not getting anything from it any more. I

am leaving!!!!!!!

Lynn

Pre op Dr Booth

August 13th

Re: THE UGLY HEAD OF CENSORSHIP!

>

>

> > Get off your high horse, Nick. I have never censored anyone yet. Read

> > my other message and please get a clue!

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > > > ( - Is car talk okay " by the rules? " After all, these

> > cars

> > > > > are metaphors for WLS procedures.)

> > > >

> > > > Nick, what is the point of this type of attack on me?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------

> > ----

> > > >

[Guest guest]

I really wish

> that people would e-mail privately if thwey have problems with a

person. This is getting frustrating and it is w waste of time.

> Ellen(Pam

I agree whole heartedly. I have spent way too much time reading the

nit picking exchange of words between these two. I would have much

preferred they keep thier war of words between just the two of them

and not " junk " up the messages. I would have understood if it was an

issue that was of importance, but it seems to have turned into a

really juvenile exchange. I'm getting tired of it, almost as tired

as I am of hearing about the other censorship issue. If you all are

sure that you care about " the good of the members of this group " ,

then grow up and stop acting like bratty kids fighting over who is

going to get the " last word " . Post messages that actually " help "

us! JMHO~ a