Guest guest Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 An interesting article on Texas ish Rite Hospital in Dallas and their use of a French Phsyiotherapy method as well as their version of the Ponseti method. But some of the quotes don't seem quite right or accurate. Some excerpts from the article follows. [MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS] " The hospital began offering the French technique in 1996, but because of the lengthy time commitment required, many parents still choose the traditional Ponseti method, s said. " [THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN THE PONSETI METHOD DESCRIBED AS THE TRADITIONAL METHOD OF TREATMENT. DALLAS DID NOT START USING THEIR VERSION OF THE PONSETI METHOD UNTIL ABOUT 2001] Developed by Dr. Ignacio Ponseti, the technique uses a series of complete leg castings once a week for several weeks or months until the feet are corrected. The child also usually wears a bar connecting his or her shoes for 23 hours a day for the next few years. [THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PONSETI METHOD NEEDING SHOES AND BAR FOR 23 HOURS A DAY FOR YEARS IS OBVIOUSLY NOT ACCURATE] With both methods, minor surgery to stretch the heel cord is sometimes required. Between the two methods, however, doctors at ish Rite Hospital have reduced the need for major surgery by more than 60 percent. [THE LAST REPORT I HAD SEEN INDICATED THAT TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE'S RATES OF " NON-SURGICAL " SUCCESS FOR THEIR VERSIONS OF THE FRENCH AND PONSETI METHODS WERE ABOUT THE SAME AT ABOUT 50% NOT NEEDING POSTERIOR RELEASE TYPES OF SURGERY. AS MANY DIFFERENT RECENT PONSETI METHOD STUDIES HAVE INDICATED, FOLLOWING THE PONSETI METHOD EXACTLY AS DESIGNED SHOULD RESULT IN AT LEAST 90% AND PROBABLY MORE THAN 95% NOT NEEDING POSTERIOR RELEASE TYPES OF SURGERY.] http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/10562317.htm A study just published in the Jan 2005 issue of the Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics by Texas ish Rite in Dallas indicated that they had 49% who needed posterior release or posterio-medial release types of surgery when using the French Physiotherapy method. But they did avoid tenotomies for 40% versus 15% in the Ponseti method. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15614069 At the 2002 POSNA convention in Salt Lake City during a discussion of the Ponseti and French methods, it was mentioned that the U of Iowa studies included a few children who had started out with French Physiotherpay and were heading for surgery at about 11 months of age. The parents then went to Iowa where the Ponseti method was able to successfully avoid the surgery. I had reported that in a message about that meeting back in May of 2002 as follows: " At the beginning of the discussion, one doctor in the audience stood up and asked Dr. s of ish Rite that based on the presentations of today, that perhaps if by 12 months, the French method was not being successful, that before going forward with the surgery that perhaps they could then still send the child to Iowa or to Dr. Herzenberg for the Ponseti method (which) had been shown to be successful up to 16 months. " http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/nosurgery4clubfoot/message/11030 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 The same article was also in the Dallas Morning News on December 28, 2004. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/12 2804dnmetclubfoot.40745.html At the 2004 POSNA Convention, Texas presented a study comparing their versions of the French and Ponseti methods. It was called a Prospective Study of Idiopathic Clubfeet Comparing the Ponseti and French PT Methods - Early Results B s, MD (n); C E ston, MD (n); S Faulks (n); H (n) In that study, they indicated that their non-surgical success (not using posterior releases) with the Ponseti method was about 50-60%. That was about the same degree of non-surgical success as they had with the French Physiotherapy. > > An interesting article on Texas ish Rite Hospital in Dallas and > their use of a French Phsyiotherapy method as well as their version > of the Ponseti method. But some of the quotes don't seem quite > right or accurate. Some excerpts from the article follows. [MY > COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS] > > " The hospital began offering the French technique in 1996, but > because of the lengthy time commitment required, many parents still > choose the traditional Ponseti method, s said. " [THIS IS THE > FIRST TIME THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN THE PONSETI METHOD DESCRIBED AS THE > TRADITIONAL METHOD OF TREATMENT. DALLAS DID NOT START USING THEIR > VERSION OF THE PONSETI METHOD UNTIL ABOUT 2001] > > Developed by Dr. Ignacio Ponseti, the technique uses a series of > complete leg castings once a week for several weeks or months until > the feet are corrected. The child also usually wears a bar > connecting his or her shoes for 23 hours a day for the next few > years. [THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PONSETI METHOD NEEDING SHOES AND BAR > FOR 23 HOURS A DAY FOR YEARS IS OBVIOUSLY NOT ACCURATE] > > With both methods, minor surgery to stretch the heel cord is > sometimes required. Between the two methods, however, doctors at > ish Rite Hospital have reduced the need for major surgery by > more than 60 percent. [THE LAST REPORT I HAD SEEN INDICATED THAT > TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE'S RATES OF " NON-SURGICAL " SUCCESS FOR THEIR > VERSIONS OF THE FRENCH AND PONSETI METHODS WERE ABOUT THE SAME AT > ABOUT 50% NOT NEEDING POSTERIOR RELEASE TYPES OF SURGERY. AS MANY > DIFFERENT RECENT PONSETI METHOD STUDIES HAVE INDICATED, FOLLOWING > THE PONSETI METHOD EXACTLY AS DESIGNED SHOULD RESULT IN AT LEAST 90% > AND PROBABLY MORE THAN 95% NOT NEEDING POSTERIOR RELEASE TYPES OF > SURGERY.] > http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/10562317.htm > > A study just published in the Jan 2005 issue of the Journal of > Pediatric Orthopedics by Texas ish Rite in Dallas indicated > that they had 49% who needed posterior release or posterio-medial > release types of surgery when using the French Physiotherapy > method. But they did avoid tenotomies for 40% versus 15% in the > Ponseti method. > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? > cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15614069 > > At the 2002 POSNA convention in Salt Lake City during a discussion > of the Ponseti and French methods, it was mentioned that the U of > Iowa studies included a few children who had started out with French > Physiotherpay and were heading for surgery at about 11 months of > age. The parents then went to Iowa where the Ponseti method was > able to successfully avoid the surgery. I had reported that in a > message about that meeting back in May of 2002 as follows: > > " At the beginning of the discussion, one doctor in the audience stood > up and asked Dr. s of ish Rite that based on the > presentations of today, that perhaps if by 12 months, the French > method was not being successful, that before going forward with the > surgery that perhaps they could then still send the child to Iowa or > to Dr. Herzenberg for the Ponseti method (which) had been shown to be > successful up to 16 months. " > http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/nosurgery4clubfoot/message/11030 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.