Guest guest Posted October 19, 2005 Report Share Posted October 19, 2005 I just thought it worth mentioning that I have just been diagnosed with MELAS A3243G via urine cells. My mito doc in Sydney believes that this is a more reliable source than blood test. pamela Re: Re: Question re: MELAS diagnosis a I'm not sure about where to have it tested, but would think that one of the mito labs would be the best place - Dr. Hoppel, Dr. Shoffner, Dr. Damouro. If you have a mtDNA defect and he has the same mother, than he would have to carry the defective gene. Maybe a mito doc would diagnosis him based on this. laurie > Dear Mitoldies. > > I have a question regarding a diagnosis. I am confirmed with MELAS as are > my children. My mother, now deceased, is presumed to have had MELAS, likewise > her mother, based on their medical histories. My brother was recently > tested for MELAS and the results were negative. This does not make sense. I can > only imagine a clerical error, a lab error, an error in handling the lab > sample, which was blood, or a lack of test sensitivity. He has a life-long > learning disability, cardiomyopathy, muscle weakness, prediabetic, no hearing loss > yet, but has sleep apnea for which he uses a CPAP. > > My brother is currently applying for SSI based on his clinical signs. The > MELAS diagnosis would provide the evidence to make his temporary supplement > permanent. Besides retesting, do you have any suggestions? If retesting, then > with whom and where? The rest of us have the A3243G mtDNA mutation albeit at > less than 10% heteroplasy. This mutation can be determined with only a > blood test if honing in on this specific defect. > > Thank you for your help. > > a > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2005 Report Share Posted October 19, 2005 Is muscle from a frozen biosy considered reliable for MELAS testing? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Hugs, Marie _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of pamelama33 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:52 AM To: Subject: Re: Re: Question re: MELAS diagnosis I just thought it worth mentioning that I have just been diagnosed with MELAS A3243G via urine cells. My mito doc in Sydney believes that this is a more reliable source than blood test. pamela Re: Re: Question re: MELAS diagnosis a I'm not sure about where to have it tested, but would think that one of the mito labs would be the best place - Dr. Hoppel, Dr. Shoffner, Dr. Damouro. If you have a mtDNA defect and he has the same mother, than he would have to carry the defective gene. Maybe a mito doc would diagnosis him based on this. laurie > Dear Mitoldies. > > I have a question regarding a diagnosis. I am confirmed with MELAS as are > my children. My mother, now deceased, is presumed to have had MELAS, likewise > her mother, based on their medical histories. My brother was recently > tested for MELAS and the results were negative. This does not make sense. I can > only imagine a clerical error, a lab error, an error in handling the lab > sample, which was blood, or a lack of test sensitivity. He has a life-long > learning disability, cardiomyopathy, muscle weakness, prediabetic, no hearing loss > yet, but has sleep apnea for which he uses a CPAP. > > My brother is currently applying for SSI based on his clinical signs. The > MELAS diagnosis would provide the evidence to make his temporary supplement > permanent. Besides retesting, do you have any suggestions? If retesting, then > with whom and where? The rest of us have the A3243G mtDNA mutation albeit at > less than 10% heteroplasy. This mutation can be determined with only a > blood test if honing in on this specific defect. > > Thank you for your help. > > a > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2005 Report Share Posted October 19, 2005 Pamela, Did your doctor give any reason for why he believes urine cells are more reliable than blood? I was under the impression that any good source of DNA, whether the defect is in nDNA or mtDNA, would produce the same results since specific mutations such as A3243G can only be confirmed through genetic screening. This is a new twist to me, so I'm curious about his reasoning. Thanks. Barbara > I just thought it worth mentioning that I have just been diagnosed with MELAS > A3243G via urine cells. My mito doc in Sydney believes that this is a more reliable > source than blood test. pamela Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2005 Report Share Posted October 19, 2005 Hi Marie, Respiratory chain enzyme activities in skeletal muscle: 1) If a muscle biopsy is performed to pursue a diagnostic workup, then test respiratory chain enzyme activities. 2) Patients with MELAS have been found to have marked deficiency in the activity of complex I of the respiratory chain. 3) Some patients with the disorder have a combined deficiency of complex I and complex IV. Mitochondrial DNA mutation analysis on blood, skeletal muscle, or hair follicles: 1) Individuals with more severe clinical manifestations of MELAS generally have greater than 80% mutant mtDNA in stable tissues such as muscle. 2) In rapidly dividing cells, such as the components of the hematopoietic lineages, A3243G mutation may segregate to extremely low levels, making genetic diagnosis from blood difficult. 3) Confirming the presence or absence of mutation MAY require a muscle biopsy with analysis of skeletal muscle. Marie mitomom@...> wrote: Is muscle from a frozen biosy considered reliable for MELAS testing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2005 Report Share Posted October 19, 2005 Marie, A biopsy, frozen or fresh, could confirm the presence of deficiencies in one of the respiratory chain complexes, but that would not specifically confirm MELAS. History can be very suggestive and some patients with confirmed OXPHOS deficiencies are given a diagnosis of likely MELAS on that basis. Certainty comes only from genetic screening for known MELAS mutations. Genetic screening does not require a muscle biopsy, but can be done with any tissue that yields good mtDNA. Most labs have their protocols and preferences set for tissue. My nDNA and mtDNA screening was done with lymphoblasts extracted from blood shipped on dry ice, and also with dried blood and buccal cells extracted from a cheek swab. In 1999 I was screened for 11 known mtDNA mutations, including 2 known MELAS mutations, by Lee-Jun Wong at town U lab, DC. > Is muscle from a frozen biosy considered reliable for MELAS testing? > > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > Hugs, > > Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.