Still waiting for Info/Was Info please?Was Off GFCF For Good:

[Guest guest]

Tim, my question was for sources of information to research the

claims you are making - apparently regarding the products &

nutritional recommendations of a company that doesn't post any links

to research or recommend an autism treatment protocol on its

website. Other treatments used by members of this list are open and

available to all for questions, study and scrutiny. We don't have to

call a company's office manager for verbal info.

I'm also concerned that you have - inadvertantly, I trust - miscited

Dr. Megson's research on GI damage and vitamin A. Her work and

testimony is available on her website (www.megson.com) and in the

Congressional Record. No need to call an office manager for it.

I hope you will take YB up on her request to cross-post your post for

study & discussion. Given the amazing results you wrote about, I'm

sure you will want to share this info.

In GFCFKids@y..., " Tim & s " wrote:

> -

> A good question.... ... We will continue to answer any questions as

> best we can. In the meantime, we will be sure to let them know

that they

> may expect some inquiries from some of you in the near future. I

know they

> won't mind.

>

> Tim

>

> Info please?Was Off GFCF For Good: WARNING!

> CONTROVERSIAL!

>

.....I hope you will be able to

> > cite some references for this list so that interested members can

> > investigate....

> >

..

[Guest guest]

he

is focussing more on

assisting> patients than in publishing his findings.

Tim, I appreciate any information that you have shared that has helped

your daughter. I view your story anecdotally and am extremely open to

other interventions, other then GFCF.

I don't know anything about Chem Balance, but if " " truly had

credible scientific evidence his FIRST priority would be to " publish

his findings " , because it would protect his work,

direct money toward him and help far more childern then those he sees.

That's just how it goes.

Judy

[Guest guest]

> I am sorry that you or anyone else thinks that there is some sort

of " shroud

> of secrecy " about all of this. Try to imagine the perceptions of

Drs.

> Reichelt and Shattuck in the mid-80's. I am sure that is the same

sort of

> cynicism that is facing now. is focussing more on

assisting

> patients than in publishing his findings.... "

Dr. Reichelt began publishing his theories and trials in the 1970's.

Dr. Shattuck originally set out to disprove his work, but wound up

finding merit in it. Dr. Wakefield and many others are speaking

their minds and publishing their research despite enormous

opposition. And that's how they are helping thousands of people

every day.