Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 A little while ago I mentioned that my " MELAS " A3243G mutation was found by analysis from urine cells rather than blood or hair and several people were interested in this method of diagnosis. I just got an article sent to me by a helpful research scientist at Westmead Childrens Hospital here in Sydney, explaining the advantages of not only using blood but also urine to diagnose MELAS. Found it online and here is the link. At least here in Sydney a general practitioner can order this specific test which here costs only $120 and takes only 3-4 wks to come back - if you are able to do this just as easily in the U.S. it may at least help to exclude this particular (common ??) mutation for those who are searching for diagnosis (although not always conclusive). The report is available in full text at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/109593806/HTMLSTART It is quite clearcut. pamela Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks Pamela laurie > A little while ago I mentioned that my " MELAS " A3243G mutation was found by > analysis from urine cells rather than blood or hair and several people were > interested in this method of diagnosis. I just got an article sent to me by > a helpful research scientist at Westmead Childrens Hospital here in Sydney, > explaining the advantages of not only using blood but also urine to diagnose > MELAS. Found it online and here is the link. At least here in Sydney a > general practitioner can order this specific test which here costs only $120 > and takes only 3-4 wks to come back - if you are able to do this just as > easily in the U.S. it may at least help to exclude this particular (common > ??) mutation for those who are searching for diagnosis (although not always > conclusive). The report is available in full text at > http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/109593806/HTMLSTART > It is quite clearcut. pamela > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks for this--it would certainly be something to look at as you say to at least exclude one mutation and is a non invasive choice. Janet Sample Study showing higher loads of MELAS mutation in urine cells A little while ago I mentioned that my " MELAS " A3243G mutation was found by analysis from urine cells rather than blood or hair and several people were interested in this method of diagnosis. I just got an article sent to me by a helpful research scientist at Westmead Childrens Hospital here in Sydney, explaining the advantages of not only using blood but also urine to diagnose MELAS. Found it online and here is the link. At least here in Sydney a general practitioner can order this specific test which here costs only $120 and takes only 3-4 wks to come back - if you are able to do this just as easily in the U.S. it may at least help to exclude this particular (common ??) mutation for those who are searching for diagnosis (although not always conclusive). The report is available in full text at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/109593806/HTMLSTART It is quite clearcut. pamela Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.