Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 A very interesting related topic in science has been whether fields are " done being discovered " . For example, some of the first people who worked on antibodies proposed some theories, then changed fields, saying " we know all there is to know " . This has happened in physics (before Einstein) and other sciences. I find that incredible that any scientist could dare to say " we have all the facts, there are no new discoveries " . Each of us, and each animal, plant, rock, etc. is unique, and even if we eventually " figure everything out " , by the time we do, everything will have changed! Here's an article on the subject of " completely studied fields " if anyone is interested - it is mildly technical and focused on immunology, but the key points are pretty clear (and a lesson for scientists and doctors): http://www.nature.com/ni/journal/v2/n10/full/ni1001-893.html Take care, RH > > > > Laurie just wondering why hypothyroidism (which I've had since > > 13) given > > > > the label autoimmune is not linked to mito? I also was told > > that also by > > > > my mito doc - seems to me something cellular based like mito > > could cause any > > > > thing.. pamela > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Hello > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hypothyroidism can be a part of mito. I have it, but mine > > happens to > > > > be autoimmune and not due to mito. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.