Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 This is a reprint of a prior message about the Ponseti " Non-Surgical " method of treatment. This message was originally written about 2 years ago but has some details on the long term outcome studies done at the U of Iowa on Ponseti method children treated at the U of Iowa in the 1950's and 1960's. Here is some information relating to reported long, long term outcomes into adulthood in the Ponseti method. Please realized that I am a parent and not a doctor, that the treatment of clubfoot is still a controversial issue among doctors and that many doctors may still not agree with the use of the Ponseti method. That being said, I think that it is important for new parents to be aware of all alternatives available to them as they are making decisions regarding the treatment of their own child. An Instructional Course Lecture on Clubfoot in the Feb 2002 issue of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS). The following excerpts are from that 23 page article called " Congenital Clubfoot " An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons are as follows: " The literature from about 1970 to 1990 contains enthusiastic reports on the correction of congenital clubfoot through extensive surgical release procedures. Over time, we have come to recognize the complications of such surgery, including recurrence, overcorrection, stiffness, and pain. Perhaps because of these findings, there seems to be a renewed interest in nonoperative techniques for the correction of congenital clubfoot. Recent studies have documented the effectiveness of the two leading techniques involving serial manipulation and cast treatment. The Ponseti technique appears to be effective and requires only a reasonable amount of time out of the lives of the patient and his or her parents. The technique frequently includes some minimal invasive surgery. The Kite and Lovell technique requires minimally invasive surgery less often [avoiding things like a tenotomy] but is more time-consuming. " [Elsewhere in the report, they state that the Kite method takes an average of 22 months in long legged casts and also that the Kite method uses a Phelps splint which is worn until the age of ten years to help prevent relapsing. Although there may be some somewhere, I have yet to hear of any doctor that is still using the original 22 month Kite method. I have talked to a Dr. who was a student under Dr. Wood Lovell (Kites Partner) who said that there is no one he is aware of who still uses the original Kite method] " French investigators and others have introduced new ideas that may reduce the need to immobilize the foot. The French approach requires fairly extensive physical therapy and demands substantial parental time and attention. It is not yet clear that the French technique is more successful in obviating the need for surgery than is expertly applied serial manipulation and cast immobilization. It also has not been proved that the long-term results of the French technique are better than those of serial manipulation and cast immobilization. It is probable that unless the French technique is found to substantially decrease the need for surgery, it will prove to be less cost-effective than serial manipulation and cast immobilization. " " It is likely that a small number of clubfeet will require surgery even after expertly applied nonoperative treatment. However, it is hoped that such surgery will be less extensive than procedures commonly performed in the recent past. " The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:290 (2002) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nosurgery4clubfoot/message/10996 Regarding the Ponseti method, the U of Iowa has done 4 long term outcome studies on Adults who were treated with the Ponseti method as children mostly born in the 1950's and 60's. The studies were done in 1963, 1972, 1980 and 1993. Summaries of the studies can be read in Dr. Ponseti's 1996 book " Congenital Clubfoot, Fundamentals of Treatment " . The actual studies can probably be downloaded from Medline or the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery web sites. The more recent long term studies are: Laaveg, S.J., and I.V. Ponseti. " Long-term results of treatment of congenital clubfoot. " Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume. 62(1): 23-31, 1980 Jan. , M., and Frederick R. Dietz. " Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot. A Thirty-Year Follow-up Note. " The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 77(10): 1477-1489, 1995 Oct. The 4 studies done in 1963, 1972, 1980 and 1993 detail the statistics. About 4 years ago, I tried to summarize my understanding of the outcomes of those studies as discussed in Dr. Ponseti's book. It is possible that I may have misstated or misunderstood something in my reading of this material in Dr. Ponseti's book, but I think that this is an accurate summary. If someone knows where I have misstated something please advise me. The 1963 study was of 67 cases out of 286 cases of clubfeet treated from 1948 to 1956 (I assume children from 7-15 yrs old by 1963). Of the original 286 cases they did not include 46 patients with mild clubfeet that corrected by simple manipulations with 1-3 casts or 149 other patients that were originally treated in other clinics and referred later to Iowa and 24 were lost to followup. The age of the 67 studied patients (94 clubfeet) at the beginning of treatment was from one week to 6 months with the average being one month of age. Relapses were treated with remanipulation and 3-4 casts and repeat relapses were treated with a transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon. This tendon is on the top of the foot and not inside the ankle joint. None of the children had pain and all could walk on their toes. In 1972, they did a second study addressing the effect of the tibialis anterior tendon transfer by studying 58 feet of 34 patients aged 9-20 yrs (average 16 yrs). This procedure had only been done on children who had had recurrent relapses. 43 feet had a transfer of the tibialis anterior tendon. There are a number of details about the things that appeared to work better than others. None of the patients had pain or complaints about their feet. Many of them were participating in High School athletics. All could walk on their toes. Some joint stiffness and muscle weakness was observed in the four feet that had been also treated with a medial release. In 1972, there had been a higher incidence of relapsing that has been greatly reduced by a greater emphasis on parents use of the FAB. Recent studies have shown that for those who use the Ponseti method and FAB as designed, the risk of relapsing is about 6-7% while for those who do not use the FAB as prescribed have about a 70-80% risk of relapsing. In 1980, they did a study on 70 patients with 104 clubfeet followed for 10-27 years after treatment. It was of children who had been less than six months old when treatment began and had not been treated elsewhere. The mean age at follow-up was 18.8 years. The objective of the study was to see if the conservative treatment method had given the patient a functional, painless foot. Of the 70 patients involved, their mean age at the start of treatment was 6.9 weeks, the mean duration of plaster casting was 8.6 weeks. The mean number of casts used for all treatment (initial treatment and from any relapses) was 9 casts. All 70 patients had an orthopedic and neurological examination in which the strength of the muscles were recorded, along with stance, gait, and motion of the ankle and foot. X-rays were taken and analyzed. In other measures, none of the 104 feet experienced pain when walking. 89% stated that their corrected clubfoot was normal or close to normal in appearance, and 99 percent were able to wear normal shoes of the same size. 72% of the patients were very satisfied with the end result of their treatment, 19% were satisfied and only 4% were not satisfied. All 70 patients could walk without limping and could also walk on their toes. In the fourth study, by Dr. Dietz and in 1992-3, the clubfoot patients treated between 1950 and 1967 were contacted. 45 patients ranging in age from 25 to 42 years of age with 71 total clubfeet were able to return for evaluation. They have about 3 pages of details of the 1992-3 study, methods and results that relating to x-rays, pain, function, etc. that seem to show that their long term results are almost functionally equivalent to that of a population born with normal feet. Dr. Ponseti also mentions that there have not been univerally accepted rating systems for the assessments of results compared to initial severity. He also says that comparison of the results of their long term studies to those of short term studies of other clinics is not appropriate because the measurements of results are based on different factors. Ponseti's method emphasizes patient satisfaction and painless functional performance into adult life based on a treatment that is primarily manipulative with limited surgery. Most other clinics treatment is primarily surgical after a period of manipulation and casting Dr. Posneti gave a lecture on relapsing in the Ponseti method in October 2001 that was published in the Iowa Orthopedic Journal. Iowa Orthopedic Journal: Volume 22, 55-56, 2002 RELAPSING CLUBFOOT: CAUSES, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT, Ignacio V. Ponseti. In that lecture he said. " In the first 20 years of my practice, relapses occurred in about half of the patients at ages ranging from ten months to five years, averaging two-and-one-half years. Usually, relapses were observed from two to four months after the splints were prematurely discarded at the families' own initiative, believing that the correction was stable. More recently, relapses have been less frequent because, for one thing, I have further overcorrected the deformity in the last plaster and to be certain that the calcaneus is fully abducted and its anterior joint surface is well under the head of the talus. Secondly, there has been greater awareness on the part of the Parents regarding the importance of maintaining the night splints after correction for three to four years. " " In recent years, I have treated 90 patients - 52 of them initially seen from birth to three months of age, and 38 from three Months to one year of age. Seventy Percent of the patients had plaster casts or physical therapy elsewhere. Forty patients had been previously indicated for surgery by the initial treating Physician. To my surprise, it was possible to successfully correct all these feet with manipulations, and four or five plaster casts, changed every five days. I performed percutaneous Achilles tenotomy in 84 percent of the patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were compliant with the use of the foot abduction splint. There were 14 relapses. The rate of relapse was seven percent in compliant patients, compared to 78 Percent in non-compliant patients. Relapses were unrelated to age at presentation or to the number of casts required for correction. " At the 2002 Convention of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons in Dallas, there were a number of Ponseti method papers presented. Dr. Morcuende presented the U of Iowa's paper that essentially said that they felt that Ponseti method treatment was successful up to about 1 year of age and maybe as far as to 18 months of age. It also indicated that it could be used successfully for almost all children for whom other doctors had indicated a need the surgery. http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/anmt2002/sciprog/052.htm . Dr. Lehman presented NYU's paper was on comparing 3 different foot severity rating systems as well as their success with the Ponseti method. http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/anmt2002/sciprog/051.htm Dr. Noam Bor presented his and Dr. Herzenbergs Age related success with the Ponseti method after prior methods had not worked http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/anmt2002/sciprog/053.htm All three of those papers would have included information on children from our internet groups. The U of Iowa has done long term studies on patients 25 to 42 but surgical method studies haave only reported out about an average of 16 years. I think that Dr. Ponseti's opinion would be that surgery can add potential risks and potential complications that can be lessened or avoided by not using surgical treatment unless there is no alternative. But there are probably other doctors who do not agree. Some stories of adults who were treated in the 1950's and 60's can be read at Dr. Ponseit's web site: Ross Snyder, born in 1956. http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/snyder.html Woods, born in 1964. http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/woods.html Beth Clewell, born in the early 1960's. http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/clewell.htm l A video of all of the procedures in the Ponseti method starring Ross Snyder as a baby in 1956 can be seen on the internet at Dr. Ponseti's web site. It is a downloadable video that can be viewed on your computer in 2 to 4 minute sections or all at once (21 minutes) depending on your computers capabilities. It shows all of the procedures including Ponseti method manipulation, casting, tenotomy as well as following Ross as a baby, at 3 years, 8 years, 18 years and at 42 years with an interview of Ross. It can be found at the bottom of the testimonials site at http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/patientlist .. html Dr. Ponseti states that " Parents of infants born with clubfeet may be reassured that their baby, if otherwise normal, when treated by expert hands will have normal looking feet with normal function for all practical purposes. The well-treated clubfoot is no handicap and is fully compatible with a normal, active life. " " The majority of clubfeet can be corrected in infancy in about six to eight weeks with the proper gentle manipulations and plaster casts. The treatment is based on a sound understanding of the functional anatomy of the foot and of the biological response of muscles, ligaments and bone to corrective position changes gradually obtained by manipulation and casting. " " Less than 5% of infants born with clubfeet may have very severe, short plump feet with stiff ligaments unyielding to stretching. These babies may need surgical correction. The results are better if bone and joint surgery can be avoided altogether. " http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/parents.htm l Dr. Ponseti and others at the U of Iowa have done 4 long term outcome studies on adults who were treated with the Ponseti method as children in the 1950's and 60's. These studies were done in 1963, 1972, 1980 and 1993. Concerning the most recent study, they indicated: " In a recent review of our patients treated 25 to 42 years ago, it was found that although the treated clubfeet were less supple than the normal foot, there were no significant difference in function or performance compared to a population of a similar age born with normal feet. " (the studies included evaluations of whether or not foot pain existed) http://www.vh.org/pediatric/provider/orthopaedics/Clubfoot/Clubfoot.h t ml In his 1999 Video " A 42 Year Case Study " , Dr. Ponseti said; " When compared to other techniques for correction of the deformity, our manipulation, casting and splinting procedure has never resulted in any disability for the patients. " I hope that this information is helpful to those who may be interested in it. and (3-17-99) http://www.vh.org/pediatric/patient/orthopaedics/clubfeet/egbert.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.