Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Hi everyone, I know this subject has come up. But why is the brace better than the Markell? I read conflicting information re: them both. I have heard Markell is better at preventing relapse and the is better at preventing relapse. If the shoe itself maintains the feet abducted/rotated at a 70 degree angle and shoulder width apart , why does it matter? I am feeling so nervous at the idea of a relapse; my son who is (2) has gone through the true Ponseti method and has been in his FAB 23/7 for the past 3 weeks and I read someone's post that " ...relapse in the after a month. " I will be sending photos of my son's feet to Dr.P asap so he can confirm what type of cf he has " atypical or non-atypical? " This whole experience can be so nerve wracking at times. I just hate to see the little guy suffer longer then he has too.-- Anita Kelliher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.