Guest guest Posted May 17, 2004 Report Share Posted May 17, 2004 We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by our endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared to other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small for gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2004 Report Share Posted May 17, 2004 Hi- We have definitely seen positive results since Dominic has been on GHT since Sept 2002. His " Growth Rate Per Year " has increased tremendously. I am at work and don't have the actual figures with me so I can't provide those to you. There are many studies which Dr. H and Dr. Stanhope presented at last year's conference which demonstrate GHT does work with RSS kids so hopefully someone more knowledgeable on this listserve can either point you to those or explain them to you. I have found that some endos that do not treat many RSS patients are not as knowledgeable about the most recent GHT studies. From my own experience, the first two endos we had did not feel GHT would increase Dom's final height much. But, these endos had very limited knowledge about RSS. As far as SGA is concerned, Dominic is SGA and RSS so perhaps your child is as well? I am sure someone else will respond. Good luck on making your decision, it's good that you are weighing your options carefully. F. -- In RSS-Support , " mrsdebo2004 " wrote: > We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by our > endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared to > other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small for > gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2004 Report Share Posted May 17, 2004 My son was growing at a rate of about 2 " a year prior to starting GH. He is now growing at a rate of about 4 " per year. So his growth has basically double since starting Gh and he is actually moving toward the growth chart rather than parallel to it at about 3 standard deviations below the 3% line. I would say it is making a huge difference for my son! (Not only in growth!) He has been eating better, gaining more weight and has generally been healthier since starting GH! Blessings, Carmen, mom to Storm, RSS, 8y8m, 48 " tall and 50 pounds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2004 Report Share Posted May 17, 2004 Please tell me what research your endo provided to you. THis makes me SOOO mad I could spit. I have every medical journal article ever published on Silver Syndrome and GH, and on GH and small for gestational age, and your endo simply isn't correct. There were some early studies done 5 or more years ago, that didn't have as good of results. But there were many problems with these studies -- no control groups, and most of the studies used VERY low dosage amounts (none of which are used today) and what they called " discontinuous " growth hormone -- meaning they did not give GH every day, sometimes only 3-4 times a week. Children who are growth hormone deficient usually have the best results with growth hormone; however, some studies are finding that RSS children are getting very close in their response, depending on several predictive factors (age at Tt start, midparental target height). There are few studies that compare RSS vs SGA, simply because the crossover is too vague. They used to think that RSS kids would have BETTER response than SGA kids; if not better, it would be the same, but not worse. The first 2-3 years on GH are the most important as those are the catcj-up years; most kids then begin to follow their new growth curve. In monitoring the stats on gosh, more than 50 kids on GH in our division, we are finding that most seem to grow less than 2 inches a year prior to GH; then they grow 3-4 inches in year 1, 3-4 inches in year 2, 3 inches or so in year 3, and then it tapers off to 2 inches a year after that. My daughter has grown approximately 13 inches in 3 1/2 years. She has gone from the 0% tile in height to almost the 65th percentile. My husband is 6'4 " so that helps. Her target is the 75th percentile. We give her her shot religiously every night, almost at the same time every night (some studies indicate consistency is better) and have only missed about 5 shots in 3 1/2 years. Everytime I am too tired to get up again (we give her the shot after she is asleep) my husband always reminds me " if she was diabetic, would you stay in bed and not give her her shot " and then we rock- paper-scissors for who is getting up.... Please let me know what studies your endo is giving you. I would be happy to email you a listing of all of the current studies. In addition, I hope to have them added to MAGIC by the end of this month. You can then get free copies yourself and hand deliver them to your doctor!!! Salem, MAGIC > We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by our > endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared to > other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small for > gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2004 Report Share Posted May 18, 2004 I have to just echo what others are saying. Our son Matt has been on growth hormone for a year. He has gained at least 6 inches and 9 pounds. He is on the 10th percentile for growth for the first time since he was a baby. It has been incredible. I would definately ask your doctor for his resources about the less responsive. I would double check that! If you want to see " photos of results " check out the photo section under Matt H. They say it all. Good luck with your decision. Beth > We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by our > endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared to > other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small for > gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 I am interested to find out what types of " risks " are involved with GHT. Has anyone talked about what possible problems with using GHT an what type of risk we are taking by putting our children on GHT. Jenni > > We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by > our > > endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared > to > > other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small > for > > gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 Each of the pharmaceutical websites has a list of the possible side effects -- keep in mind that any reaction, even a single episode, in the FDA test cases has to be recorded. With RSS kids, there have been no side effects recorded outside whatever is already listed (unlike for Down's Syndrome kids who can develop tumors). Joint pain is one side effect that is common. I can't recall, but headache comes to mind. My memory serves me from our research (which was 3 years ago) was that almost all of the side effects are very " noticeable " immediately, so that you could stop the GH and the side effect would go away. The other side effect that is happening with RSS and SGA kids is that their fasting serum and glucose insulin levels increase significantly while on GH. Studies are abound on this subject right now -- they think it is inherent with these kids due to their low birth weight (the whole insulin resistance risk). However, the studies have found that the children's levels go back to pre- treatment levels within 6 months of being off growth hormone. This is still a negative risk, though, while they are on GH. So it is important that nutrition be watched, exercise encouraged, and regular blood tests done (your peds endo will be aware of this). However, keep in mind, and I have written this before, that for our RSS and SGA children, growth hormone therapy has been found to have benefits for not only height, but it increases their weight, DECREASES their blood pressure, increases their muscle mass, decreases their adipose tissue (body fat), increases their bone mineral content, and DECREASES their lipid levels (cholesterol, etc). > > > We are still debating about GHT. All research provided to us by > > our > > > endo shows that RSS patients are " less responsive to GH " compared > > to > > > other patients that were either growth hormone deficient or small > > for > > > gestational age. I want to know your results. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 < > Can you explain the above to me alittle better?? Liam's Endo did not explain any of this to me before starting GH. I research all the other side effects, but have not heard of this one. Mom to Liam (3 1/2 years old 34 3/4 " 27 lbs SGA, Hypothyriod, Epilepsy.) Started GHT 5/18/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.