Guest guest Posted March 10, 2004 Report Share Posted March 10, 2004 In preperation for the convention this summer I've just gotten the first batch of Olivia's medical records and have been going through them. I have a few questions since I was never told a lot of the information that is in the records. When she was 2 yrs. 1 month she had a bone age x-ray done and it says--> chronological age-2yrs 1 mth bone age - 6-9 months 2 standard deviations from the mean- 2-3 months Does anyone know what this means? or is it just that she's small so of course it would look like a younger baby is being x-rayed? Thanks so much Leah, mom to ash 9 non-rss and Olivia 4 yrs. 18# Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2004 Report Share Posted March 10, 2004 This is a copy of a message I wrote here last May, explaining what bone age is: I can try to explain this as well as I can, based on what I learned in school (I'm an Occupational Therapist) and what the doctors used to tell my parents when I was growing up. If I make any mistakes, PLEASE, someone correct me . Most bones look like the bones you see on a Halloween skeleton...the long part and then the " heads " on the 2 ends. The " neck " of the bones (where the long parts and the heads meet) is the part that actually grows as you get older (the long part can get thicker and stronger, but the neck is where the " height/length " is achieved). Obviously, the younger you are, the more growing you have to do. So the very young have somewhat larger spaces between each " bone head " to accomodate for the growth of the " necks. " How far apart the " heads " are is considered the " bone age " ...the further apart they are, the younger the bone age. The closer they are, the older the bone age...until puberty, when the bones " seal " and there is no more growth. So if a 24-month-old has the bone age of 18 months, that's good because it means he has the potential of an extra 6 months of growth in him. When I was a kid, my bone age was usually 2 to 4 years younger than my chronological age...so when I was 10, I had the potential of continued growth of a 6-year-old. The problem was, when I hit puberty (age 12), my bone age shot up something like 4 years in one year. So now instead of having the bone age of a 10- year-old, it was of a 14-year-old. With that, my bones sealed and there I was, at a whopping 4'6.75 " But BOY, am I cute . I could be wrong, but I think that's why they like to delay puberty with RSS kids nowadays...to get as much growth out of them as possible before they stop growing. -Sharon- Just an RSS kid who grew up 4'6.75 " , 94# (no more fried Oreos for me!) 38 years old on Sunday (Geez I'm getting old!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Leah - Virtually all RSS and short SGA children have delayed bone ages. I recommend that you (and anyone else) go to MAGIC's website and read the info the bone ages in the new SGA brochure that was just posted. It gives good info about it and why the delayed bone age is not predictive of final adult height later. For children who were born NORMAL weight and length and later fall off, and a bone age xray shows that their bone age is also delayed -- these children often have constitutional growth delay. What this means is that this child will suddenly grow a huge amount of inches, often in puberty, and " catch up " to where they should have been. This is NOT true with RSS/SGA children, so don't let any doctor say " oh, good, he has a delayed bone age.... " Jenn > In preperation for the convention this summer I've just gotten the > first batch of Olivia's medical records and have been going through > them. I have a few questions since I was never told a lot of the > information that is in the records. > When she was 2 yrs. 1 month she had a bone age x-ray done and it > says--> chronological age-2yrs 1 mth > bone age - 6-9 months > 2 standard deviations from the mean- 2-3 months > Does anyone know what this means? or is it just that she's small > so of course it would look like a younger baby is being x-rayed? > > Thanks so much > > Leah, mom to ash 9 non-rss and Olivia 4 yrs. 18# Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.