Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 That is what I am thinking. Madison was 9#4 and a big baby for sure. My twins were 33 weekers and were 4#10 and 3#10 but the doc said if they would of stayed in for the 40 weeks they could of very easily been 7# each which would be great for twins. The second twin was smaller because he had problems with his cord, he only had 2 vessels, so he wasn't geting the nourishment like his brother was or he would of been just as big. So maybe they are right about this one being 2 lbs. God Bless, Robin, NorthEastern, NY EDD- July 27th, 2004 IT'S A BOY!!!!!! Mommy to: & (twin boys 7 1/2), Madison, daughter, 5 years and Wife to Pup 15 years (October 31, 1988) Gastric Bypass Surgery- October 18th 2002 Start-378, current- 246(pregnant) goal 170 after baby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.