Guest guest Posted June 17, 2002 Report Share Posted June 17, 2002 Dr. Lazoff, Wow! I would never have figured that out until I noticed the code for the JAMA 1901;37:202, 205 http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v286n3/ffull/jjy10021-2.html The AMA site certainly has it up and running as if the article is still the current philosophy, even though there is no real AMA policy on it? How then do you find what the AMA policy is? I couldn't find anything else since most articles require a subscription. Sure, I will be glad to correct my statement and say that the AMA does not have a rosacea tripwire/trigger list for rosacea and I should not have ever said that. Please forgive the error. Brady Message: 25 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:43:01 -0000 From: Subject: To Brady Brady, why not let everyone know that the AMA has never made a list of rosacea tripwires, not just me? And the sugar quote you asked me to privately comment on came from a JAMA editorial written *over a hundred years ago* in 1901. That's a fun feature of the journal, not meant to reflect current medical thinking. Besides which, JAMA is a research and clinical journal published by the AMA but independently edited, so its articles, editorials, and letters to the editor are the views of the authors only -- all independent of the AMA's views, as true today as it was 100 years ago. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.