Guest guest Posted October 16, 2003 Report Share Posted October 16, 2003 Ralph, I am so sorry things are going so badly for you. Have they done a liver biopsy to find out why your liver is enlarged and what stage of damage (if any) you have in your liver? Are your liver enzymes (AST and ALT, also know as SGOT and SGPT) elevated? What about your bilirubin and/or alkaline phosphotase? I have autoimmune liver disease, which was diagnosed by having a liver biopsy the end of Dec 02. My GI, who for months had been insisting my liver was perfectly healthy, totally changed his tune and began blaming all my problems on my liver once he finally did the liver biopsy (4 months after my internal med doc said I needed one) and it showed that I have stage 3 fibrosis (scarring/damage) to my liver. Liver damage is graded on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 meaning no damage and 4 meaning cirrhosis. I already had stage 3 damage, so there was just a 'little' something wrong with my 'perfectly healthy' liver! Do you catch my sarcasm here? From January to May 03, my GI kept insisting that all of my pain, nausea, and vomiting was from my liver disease. Never mind that some of those episodes were accompanied by elevated amylase and lipase. After I saw a hepatologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, TN and he wrote my pcp a letter saying that I do definitely have autoimmune liver disease, but that the episodes of pain, nausea, and vomiting (which were often accompanied by 'spikes' in my liver enzymes up to the 700 range, which is over 20 times the normal limit) had absolutely nothing to do with my liver and/or the liver disease. He said they were caused either by my pancreas and/or the biliary tract. The guy at Vandy wasn't the least bit interested in anything other than my liver disease, so he really did nothing to help me. However, it was after the pcp got that letter and contacted my GI doc, that the GI doc then changed his tune again. This time he said, yes, he did think I had something going on with my 'biliary tree' in addition to having liver disease, but that it was all caused by the gastric bypass I had in Dec 01 and I simply needed to have surgery to have the gastric bypass reversed. I was furious! I told my pcp that was a load of crap because I had my first 'documented' case of acute pancreatitis in Jan 00, almost two full years prior to having the gastric bypass (weight loss surgery - which I would have again 10 times over and I have had absolutely NO complications from that surgery). At that point, I was totally 'through' with my old GI. He had been wrong about every single theory he'd had concerning what was going on with me, yet I had stayed with him anyway! When I really thought about him, I decided I must just be a dumb ass for keeping him as my doctor! This all really ended up being a blessing in disguise. About two days after this, a light bulb went off in my head. I began looking at my labs of the last couple of months. I noticed that my liver enzymes were spiking higher and higher again despite the fact that the liver disease seemed to under control with the prednisone I was taking. I live in a small town only 5 minutes from the local hospital. There are no GI docs in our town at all and my old GI was 100 miles south of here. On occasion, I would go to the next town (about 25-30 miles east of here) to a wonderful private hospital when I'd have an attack that warranted an ER visit. My mother begged me to please let her take me to this hospital with every attack because they treated me so much better than some of the docs at the local ER. I hated making my family drive so far every time I had an attack so most of the time I'd just go to the local hospital. The local hospital never bothered to check my lipase because they had to send it out and it took two days to get it back. I noticed that as my liver enzymes got higher, the times I went to the hospital in the next town, my lipase also got higher. When my liver enzymes were about 2 to 3 times the normal limit, my lipase was just slightly above normal. Not enough to warrant admitting me, but above normal none the less. My amylase stayed right around 50 regardless of what my liver enzymes were. In fact, my amylase had not been above normal since Oct 02. Coincidentally, this was the same time I began having problems with my blood sugar and was 3 months after the return of the acute panc attacks! My blood sugar problems have continued and in Jan 03 I saw an endocrinologist and was diagnosed with diabetes. My theory is that around Oct 02 was when I'd had enough acute panc attacks to cause permanent damage to my pancreas, resulting in diabetes and a pancreas that no longer has the ability to produce enough amylase for an elevated level, even in the most severe panc attacks. Back to my story, by early May 03, I had attacks that caused my liver enzymes to elevate to the 400 range (over 10 times normal), my amylase was normal but I don't know what my lipase was since they didn't bother to check it at my local hospital. Once I noticed the pattern, I told my husband and mother that I would agree to allow them to bring me to the hospital in the next town with any future attacks so that my lipase could be checked and we could see if episodes with higher liver enzymes DID go along with an elevated lipase if I was seen somewhere that they bothered checking it! This was May 29, 03. I didn't have to wait long as I began having a bad attack only about two hours later. When it didn't let up after several hours, I called my mom and asked her to take me to the ER. We had agreed that she would take me since she doesn't have to work and my husband has a very limited amount of vacation days and once those are used, he doesn't get paid if he misses work. Anyway, it ends up my theory was right. This time my liver enzymes were back up to the 700 range (about 20 times the normal limit), my amylase was 58 (normal is 25-100) and my lipase was 501 (normal is 23-270). I was admitted under the care of my internal med doc since he was the only doc I had in Huntsville (where the hospital is) at that time. He was VERY unhappy to find that they had not been checking my lipase when I went to my local ER. He said lipase is actually MUCH more specific for indicating pancreatitis than amylase. He said I was absolutely having an attack of acute pancreatitis and that most likely my theory was correct - when I have episodes of pain, nausea, and vomiting and my liver enzymes spike up - most likely my lipase was elevated, too. After 4 days in the hospital, I convinced him to let me go home. 36 hours later, I was back with an even worse attack. This time my liver enzymes weren't quite as bad (they were not quite 400 - around 10 times normal) but my lipase was 617, which was a little higher than it had been when I was admitted the first time. The second attack earned me a 7 day hospital stay. However, the back to back attacks were actually a blessing! My internal med doc immediately called in a GI/hepatologist in Huntsville. This was wonderful because I had no intention of ever going back to my old GI in Birmingham. My internal med doc also ordered a ct scan since it had been several months since I'd had one. The GI/Hep that my internal med doc called in is the greatest! Before he ever came to see me, he had already looked at the films from my ct scan. He told me that the ct scan showed the beginning of permanent damage to my pancreas. He told me that in addition to the autoimmune liver disease, I have chronic relapsing idiopathic pancreatitis. He said the episodes of pain, nausea, vomiting, and spikes in my liver enzymes were ABSOLUTELY caused by my pancreas, NOT by my liver. He's not sure of the cause of the cp, but thinks that part of my problem was that the bile didn't flow well. This theory was based on the fact that with many attacks my alkaline phosphotase elevates, which indicates a bile duct obstruction and also because my worst pain is in the right upper quadrant of my abdomen, under my right rib and where my gallbladder used to be (it was removed in Jun 98). The new GI/hep put me on actigall to thin my bile and help it flow better and pancreas enzymes to keep my pancreas from having to work as hard to help digest my food. I have been much better since I went under the care of my new GI/hep doc. I think I'm better for several reasons. 1. I finally have a GI/hep doc that truly listens to me. He realized immediately that I have more than one thing going on as far as my GI system is concerned. 2. He didn't just try to blame things on the gastric bypass surgery. In fact, he told me the gastric bypass did nothing but improve my overall health because it allowed me to get rid of 100 lbs of excess weight. 3. He put me on the right medications to help my pancreas and a few weeks later added an immunosuppressant to help keep my liver disease under control. 4. My internal med doc contacted my pain doc and told him I needed to be on long acting pain med in addition to the short acting oxycodone that I was on. The pain doc then added MS Contin 30 mg twice a day to my pain regimen. I also have oxycodone 5 mg that I can take 4 times a day for breakthrough pain. My GI/hep told me that he couldn't promise me I would not have problems. He said, " In fact, I can promise you that you will have problems. You have several illnesses that are both chronic and progressive. You will have pain, nausea, and vomiting. You will have acute attacks of pancreatitis and some will land you in the hospital. However, my hope is that we can improve things for you overall, decrease the number of hospitalizations, and ER visits and just generally make things better for you than they have been for the last year. " He has definitely done that. I was able to go two months without having an attack severe enough to warrant an ER visit. That was the longest I have gone since the attacks began again on July 18, 2002. Going two months without a severe attack might not sound like a lot to most people. However, to my husband and me, it felt like a miracle. From July 2002 to June 2003, I was admitted to the hospital about 20 times. I have no clue how many times I have been to the ER or to my local pcp for IV or IM meds to controll the pain/nausea/vomiting in addition to the times I was actually admitted to the hospital. I went under the care of my new GI/hep on June 4, 2003. I was discharged from the hospital on June 10, 2003. I have been admitted twice since then and one of those admissions was for surgery to repair a hernia and had nothing to do with the cp or liver disease. Despite the fact that I still require daily medication for both pain and nausea, I am much better than I was for almost a year. There is still no way I can work on job full time (or really even part time at this point), so I am very thankful for my disability retirement from my job as a federal govt employee as well as the approval of my social security disability. To be honest, I don't anticipate ever being able to work full time again. However, I am dealing with multiple illnesses, so my situation is quite complex. I have systemic lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome (an autoimmune clotting disorder, which makes taking blood thinners a life long necessity for me), autoimmune liver disease (which means I have been on long term steriods with all the side effects that they entail and also means I will be on immunosuppressant medication for the rest of my life - however, I'm grateful for the medications since the 10 year survival rate without treatment for the liver disease that I have is only 10% - so I will deal with the side effects of the meds!), type II diabetes, and chronic pancreatitis. I hope I haven't bored you to tears with my story. My main reason for sharing it with you was to let you know to NEVER give up hope. CP is often very difficult to diagnose and even many GI doctors are pretty ignorant about it. Hang in there and keep searching for the doctor that is right for you. One of the best things I did pretty early on after the acute panc attacks returned, was to ask my pcp to refer me to a pain mgmt doc. This was in Nov 02, about 4 months after the acute panc attacks returned. At first I didn't like the pain mgmt doc because he didn't seem at all sympathetic about my daily pain. I had to sign paperwork agreeing to random drug testing, to only use one pharmacy for all my pain med prescriptions, and to not accept a prescription for pain med from any doc without the okay of my pain med doc. In the beginning, my pain doc prescribed only three lortab 10 per day. I was afraid that would not be enough. However, I soon found that by having pain med available on a regular basis and treating my pain before it got to the intolerable level, I was able to keep my pain under control with less medication and I was better able to participate in life. After I was diagnosed with liver disease, the pain doc changed my med to three oxycodone 5 mg daily because there are not a lot of oral pain meds that don't contain either tylenol or asprin. With liver disease, taking tylenol three times every day is definitely not a good idea. Being on prednisone and coumadin meant I definitely can't take anything with asprin. Later, my pain meds were increased and I now take MS Contin 30 mg twice a day and oxycodone 5 mg four times a day for breakthrough pain. When I had my hernia surgery in August, the pain doc agreed to allow me to take six oxycodones a day for the first two weeks after surgery. I think if I had needed to take six for a little longer than the two weeks following surgery, he would have okayed, but by two weeks after surgery, my pain was being controlled on the former dose. When I get to the point that my pain is not controlled by the amount of pain med my pain doc prescribes, I'm usually to the point that no amount of oral med is going to help so I go to the ER for either IM or IV pain/nausea meds. Going under the care of the pain doc helped me deal better with not knowing what was causing my episodes of severe pain, nausea, and vomiting. It helped me to hang in there and keep trying to find the right doctor to give me answers and to help improve things for me as much as is possible. When your pain is not being controlled, it is very hard to remain rational and optimistic. If you are not under the care of a pain mgmt doc, I would highly recommend that you consider it. You may have a long road ahead before you have any real answers. I know simply controlling the pain is not really what you want and I do understand that. However, for right now, that may be the best that the doctors can do for you until things progress to the point that more shows up on tests and points the doctors in the right direction in regard to what is causing your pain. Take care, W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.