Mexican workers and mortality

[Guest guest]

This is a striking, troubling new article (printed March 13 and 14 in the OREGONIAN, the LA TIMES, and many other papers) that I think we should all be aware of.

tina.castanares@...

THE NATION

Mexican-Born Workers More Likely to Die on Job

Risky work, compliant attitude and language barrier contribute to the trend, AP study shows.By PritchardAssociated Press WriterMarch 14, 2004The jobs that lure Mexican workers to the United States are killing them in a worsening epidemic that claims a victim a day, an Associated Press investigation has found. Although Mexicans often take the most hazardous jobs, they are more likely than others to be killed even when doing similarly risky work. The death rates are greatest in several Southern and Western states, where a Mexican worker is four times more likely to die than the average U.S.-born worker. The accidental deaths are almost always preventable and often gruesome: Workers are impaled, shredded in machinery, buried alive. Some are just teens.For the first such study of Mexican worker deaths in the United States, the AP talked with scores of workers, employers and government officials, and analyzed years of federal safety and population statistics. Among the findings: • Mexican death rates are rising even as the U.S. workplace grows safer overall. In the mid-1990s, Mexicans were about 30% more likely to die than native-born workers; now they are about 80% more likely. • Deaths among Mexican workers in the United States increased faster than their population. Between 1996 and 2002, as the number of Mexican workers grew by about half, from 4 million to 6 million, the number of deaths rose by about two-thirds, from 241 to 387. Deaths peaked at 420 in 2001. • Although their odds of dying in the Southeast and parts of the West are far greater than the U.S. average, the fatalities occurred across the country: Mexicans died cutting North Carolina tobacco and dealing with Nebraska beef, felling trees in Colorado and welding a balcony in Florida, trimming grass at a Las Vegas golf course and falling from scaffolding in Georgia. • Even compared to other immigrants, what's happening to Mexicans is exceptional in scope and scale. Mexicans are nearly twice as likely as the rest of the immigrant population to die at work. Why is all this happening? Public safety officials and workers themselves say the answer comes down to this: Mexicans are hired to work cheap and ask few questions.They may be thrown into jobs without training or safety equipment. Their objections may remain unspoken if they know no English or are in the U.S. illegally. And their work culture and Third World safety expectations don't discourage risk-taking. Federal and state safety agencies have started to recognize the problem. But they have limited resources — only a few Spanish-speaking investigators work in regions with hundreds of thousands of recent arrivals — and often can't reach the most vulnerable Mexican workers. President Bush's recent proposal to grant illegal immigrants temporary legal protections energized the national immigration debate. Yet in these discussions, job safety has been an afterthought. Meanwhile, Mexicans continue to die on the job.

Eighteen-year-old Huerta fell to his death as he built federal low-income housing in North Carolina. His bosses ignored basic work-safety rules, according to state inspectors, when they put him in a trash container that wasn't secured to the raised prongs of a forklift. It soon toppled. In 2002, the year Huerta was killed, more Mexicans died in construction than any other industry — and more died from fatal falls than any other type of accident. A year ago in South Carolina, brothers Rigouerto and Moses Xaca Sandoval died building a suburban high school that, at 15 and 16, they might have attended. They were buried in a trench when walls of sandy soil collapsed. The United States offered the three teens wages 10 times higher than they could have earned in Mexico. They offered their employers cheap, pliant labor. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined the employers $50,475 for safety violations that led to the deaths. Accidents like these suggest that employers assign Mexicans to the most glaringly perilous tasks, says Feldmann, who fields calls from Spanish-speaking workers for an institute within the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "They're considered disposable," she said. But employers are not always at fault, some safety officials say. Although he was trained and wearing required safety gear, Jesus Soto Carbajal severed his jugular vein with a carving knife in a Nebraska meatpacking plant. The blade punctured his chest just above the protective metal mesh. Federal safety officials didn't fine the employer, although they did recommend fundamental changes in the work routine. A plant spokesman says that since the accident in 2000, workers wear larger protective tunics. Mexican worker deaths were also concentrated in agriculture. When Urbano suffered a nosebleed picking tobacco in North Carolina, his supervisor told him to rest in the shade. 's body was found 10 days later. A medical examiner said he died of unknown natural causes. The body was too decomposed for a definitive finding, but his brother suspects heatstroke. Like , many deceased workers came with little more than a grade-school education — and often left behind large families. Criminal charges against employers are rare; fines are more typical. One exception is a California dairyman who faces involuntary manslaughter charges after two workers drowned in liquid cow manure. Alatorre was overcome by fumes from the fetid stew as he tried to fix a pump at the bottom of a 30-foot concrete shaft. His partner died trying to save him. Both men were full-time workers but, according to prosecutors, they were given no safety training and no safety equipment to deal with the predictably hazardous air. The deaths received a burst of attention in early 2001. But 18 months later, in the same small town, a third Mexican-born worker died the same way at another dairy.

The AP's investigation focused on 1996 through 2002, the most recent set of worker death data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those were years when the economic boom coaxed about 1 million Mexicans beyond the border states, according to government estimates. During those years, the analysis showed, Mexicans were increasingly more likely to die on the job than U.S. workers of any race. The annual death rate for Mexicans increased to about 1 in 16,000 workers. Meanwhile, for the average U.S.-born worker, the rate steadily decreased to about 1 in 28,000. Mexicans now represent about 1 in 24 workers in the United States, but about 1 in 14 workplace deaths. Workplace fatalities had distinct regional patterns: California and TexasThese states, where generations of Mexicans have developed strong support networks, still rank atop the annual number of Mexican worker deaths, but their numbers have steadied or fallen recently. Although the numbers are low relative to other states, the death rate for Mexican workers in California is still greater than the average for U.S.-born workers. The SouthIn the bloc of states from Louisiana to land, the Mexican death rate averaged about 1 in 6,200 workers — four times that of native-born workers. Total deaths more than tripled from 27 in 1996 to 94 in 2002 in the South (excluding Texas), where some states saw Mexican populations triple to more than 100,000 workers. The WestOutside California, deaths in Western states increased from 41 to 58, and death rates hovered above the national average. Colorado and Washington stood out with consistently high rates. MidwestThe number of Mexicans killed annually doubled between 1996 and 2002, from 19 to 38; death rates were slightly above the national average for Mexicans. NortheastThe region has the fewest Mexicans, but death rates still far exceeded American worker averages. Total annual deaths rose from eight to 17. Construction was the deadliest industry. Across the nation, about 1 in 3,100 Mexican construction laborers died at work, a rate notably greater than native-born white and black construction laborers, although more in line with the rate for native-born Latinos.Unlike an American worker who may have apprenticed in a trade such as roofing or welding, a new Mexican worker might not anticipate dangers — or might ignore them, said Platner of the Center to Protect Workers' Rights, a union-funded research institute. "I think people find it easy to rationalize the hazards in their jobs if their family really needs the money and they really need the job," Platner said.

Federal and state safety officials are starting to grapple with the problem. OSHA Director Henshaw points to Spanish-language materials that the agency has put on its website, as well as the agency's Hispanic Taskforce, which coordinates worker outreach. The greatest frustration is that so many deaths are avoidable. "Ninety-five to 99% of the time, there's going to be noncompliance with a standard that could have prevented the fatality," said Joe Reina, the No. 2 OSHA official for Texas and neighboring states and a leader of the Hispanic Taskforce. Still, Reina holds workers partly responsible. "They just don't know that they have rights and responsibilities," Reina said, including the ability to complain about employers. Explaining those rights is one thing; enforcing them is another. Some OSHA officials say their resources are insufficient and note the agency's policies generally provide for punitive action only after an accident. It's unclear what Bush's guest-worker program would do for worker safety. As OSHA works to improve safety, language remains a barrier. By the agency's own count, there are no Spanish-speaking inspectors or accident investigators in the half of Georgia that includes immigrant-rich Atlanta. Some other Southern cities do have Spanish-fluent enforcement officials. In its eight-state Southeastern region, OSHA has one Spanish-speaking outreach worker. Marilyn Velez encourages workers and employers to avoid unsafe practices, but it's not easy. Some wary workers see Velez as a police officer. Others, having survived abject poverty in rural Mexico and a dangerous border crossing, believe that they don't need her. "They are looking at you like, 'Are you crazy? I have done worse things,' " Velez said. "It's just the way they see risk." Sometimes the lessons do register. But America's Mexican labor force is constantly in flux. Workers graduate to safer jobs, or perhaps they move back home. Their replacements may be the next victims. *(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX)Deaths by State In each of these 38 states, at least five Mexican-born workers died on the job from 1996 through 2002, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (The federal government does not list states with fewer than five deaths.)Alabama, 9 Alaska, 5 Arizona, 95 Arkansas, 19 California, 725 Colorado, 56 Connecticut, 8 Florida, 140 Georgia, 80 Idaho, 15 Illinois, 101 Indiana, 18 Iowa, 6 Kansas, 22 Kentucky, 7 land, 6 Michigan, 21 Minnesota, 6 Mississippi, 14 Missouri, 9 Nebraska, 9 Nevada, 31 New Jersey, 24 New Mexico, 47 New York, 38 (27 of these were in New York City) North Carolina, 69 Ohio, 9 Oklahoma, 20 Oregon, 14 Pennsylvania, 6 South Carolina, 27 Tennessee, 11 Texas, 507 Utah, 24 Virginia, 22 Washington, 53 Wisconsin, 7 Wyoming, 9 Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics,Associated PressLos Angeles Times*(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX)How the Workers' Statistics Were GatheredFrom Associated Press The Associated Press used two primary statistical sources, both collected by the federal government, to do its own computer analysis of elevated death rates among Mexican workers in the United States. The first source was the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, a Bureau of Labor Statistics project that catalogs the majority of U.S. workplace deaths. Those numbers, verified using multiple sources, allowed analysis of workplace deaths from many angles — in this case, by country of birth. The second source was the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey, the same source used to calculate the monthly unemployment rate. Many Mexican-born workers are in the United States legally, either on work visas or as legal permanent residents. But because about half of the Mexican workers are undocumented, government statisticians use a complex set of calculations to project the total population of Mexican-born workers. At the request of the AP, the population data were compiled by Passel, an authority on Mexican immigrant-related statistics from the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan research group based in Washington, D.C., which develops population estimates that are cited regularly in academic research. The AP calculated death rates for Mexican workers by comparing the estimated population of Mexican workers with the fatal injury reports. The AP focused on Mexican workers because they are the dominant immigrant worker group in the United States and account for about two-thirds of deaths among foreign-born Latino workers. Workers from other Spanish-speaking countries were excluded from the study because they are smaller in number, and government population estimates for them are considered less reliable.

[Guest guest]

One of the

facts I have made reference to for almost ten years in addressing health

disparities in Oregon is the fact that between 1987 and 1995, the average age

of death among Hispanic males was 37 or thereabouts. The causes of death being

vehicular accidents, on and off work; violence, and this was almost always

associated with alcohol and/or drug abuse; and work related deaths, construction,

agricultural and forestry based jobs pretty much took equal credit.

Preventable?

Work related deaths most definitely given federal and state laws relative to workplace

safety but in the absence of compliance and accountability. Off work vehicular

deaths and those resulting from violence and the root cause – alcohol and substance

abuse, also preventable and at least significantly reduced through education and

prevention steps.

The facts

documented in the article disseminated by Dr. Castañares and the many other

issues we have been discussing in this group beg for attention and action. I

and others who participate in these discussions attended the migrant health

forum in Seattle earlier this year. Some of us attend other events where the

call for action and the after session and evening events are filled with

conversations calling for engagement and collaboration to address the topics and

themes that make such conferences appealing. The fact is that little changes

from year to year and in many ways things are getting worse. A recent flurry of

activity took place in the last couple of weeks among this group – funding

issues. Important as this is, can we as a collective body demonstrate with good

science, not president Bush’s standard, the effect we are having in the work we

do and as a result of the conferences we sponsor and/or attend?

I submitted

a proposal for 1.5-hour presentation for the NW Migrant Health Forum. My

proposal was accepted but on the condition that I cut it down to 20-30 minutes

to accommodate two other presentations. Even though my formal presentation –

all pretty and colorful with my PowerPoint graphics enhancement, was less than

optimum due to a mishap with my memory stick, I was not able to fulfill my most

critical objective – to engage participants on a discussion and planning process

to define a process for collaboration between higher education and my

institution in particular and those of you in the field. Unable to meet the

objectives, I did not even submit a claim for mileage and I still feel guilty

so I am extending an invitation to anyone within traveling distance to Portland

or Forest Grove, Oregon, home of Pacific University, to meet for a more

extensive discussion on this collaborative agenda I would like to design with

YOU.

Interested?

Please reply directly to my e-mail address: lope9075@... or alfosolv@...

If anyone

has a bone to pick about this message, I also welcome the opportunity to discuss

any issues but ask you to meet me outside of this forum.

Have a

good day,

Alfonso

Alfonso López-Vasquez, Director

Community Partnerships & Diversity

Assistant Professor

Pacific University

2043 College Way

Forest Grove, OR 97116

(503) 352-3104

(503) 352-2291 (fax)

-----Original Message-----

From: Tina Castañares

[mailto:tina.castanares@...]

Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:24

PM

Migrant Health Research

egroup; Migrant Health News Group; AdHocFarmworkersegroups

Subject: [ ]

Mexican workers and mortality

This is a striking, troubling new article

(printed March 13 and 14 in the OREGONIAN, the LA TIMES, and many other papers)

that I think we should all be aware of.

tina.castanares@...