Re: Pecanbread= Out of the box thinking + Innvoation ...Thank God!!!

[Guest guest]

I hear you , but lets not forget that some autistic kids like

my KiKI and my son and many of Dr. Haas's sick kids; that would in

to days standards be classified as autistic; healed with little or

no intervention but diet. This could be good Hope for those that

don't have much money.

I agree that this may not be the case for some of us here. So

please, people don't twist this message. Other interventions are a

God send too. I'm just glad that my family is no longer repeating

history by experimenting with other diet plans that did not work for

us last year. What a set back and hold up on recovery, that could

have been ours sooner if I had been ready for SCD.

We are fortunate so far. Nock on wood and hope that we don't need

further intervention, but know that we have a home at Pecan Bread if

we do. And have used and implimented some of the ideas offered

here, that where not from BTVC. Thank you all for helping us and

supporting us on our journy with our " fanatical adherance " that

Elaine suggested. If this become the case I will have to get a

second job. We cna't afford much other than this SCD life style for

five. LOL! It alone is soooo expensive. But worth it, thank God.

Antoinette (2+ months entire family of five healing on SCD)

> > >

> > > AS for you , your tone is rude and bully and not very

nice,

> > > considering that I am only a mother trying to heal my sick

> > > children.

> >

> > > I strongly suggest that you calm down please, and go get the

book

> > > written from Dr. Haas to see what you may be doing wrong.

Since it

> > > is clear that you do not trust Elaine, and her message.

> >

> > I find myself somewhat irritated at your response to .

Quite

> > often your posts smack of rudeness and bullying to those of us

who

> > incorporate other biomedical aspects into the healing process

(which

> > is probably most of us). We, too, are only mothers trying to

heal our

> > sick children.

> >

> > 's response to you was the first time that I have ever

noted such

> > a " tone " from her, and I am certain that it was done out of sheer

> > frustration with you. You continue to dominate this board with

your

> > narrow-minded approach to ASD. If SCD were the ONLY way to

recover

> > than we wouldn't see children recovering through other means.

> >

> > We all believe in Elaine's message or we wouldn't be here, but

she did

> > not know all the facets of ASD (and she didn't pretend to know

all the

> > facets of ASD). There are other ways to supplement the healing

> > process of SCD, and it is bothersome that you harrass people that

> > choose these supplements.

> >

> > You claim to be Elaine's messanger and that you know Elaine's way

> > because of her writings and speaking to those that spoke with her

> > personally. Yet, we have seen here on this very board that

people who

> > spoke with Elaine disagree with you and even resent that you have

> > exaggerated their conversations with you.

> >

> > It would be helpful for you to understand that the knowledge of

ASD is

> > evolving. We are learning more about it everyday, and new

helpful

> > treatments/supplements are being discovered. Elaine is now

dead, but

> > the research and discoveries for help will continue to be made.

SCD

> > is a big part of this dilemna, but it is not the COMPLETE answer

for

> > the majority of us. What is absolutely frustrating is that she

knew

> > this and readily acknowledged it to those that she personally

spoke

> > with, but you (who never personally spoke to her) deny this.

> >

> > I think she would resent you drawing these absolutes for her

which she

> > never intended to make. And I think she would not be pleased

that you

> > have self-proclaimed yourself to be her messanger when you do not

> > thoroughly know her message.

> >

> > I imagine you think that you know everything about Elaine

because of

> > her writings. But her writings did not speak to individual

cases.

> > When you talk with those who spoke with her about their

individual

> > children (as did my close friend who is also no longer active on

this

> > list), Elaine would tell them things like, " Well, these children

need

> > so much help that sometimes you have to break a minor SCD

principle in

> > order for them to receive the benefit of another treatment they

need. "

> >

> > In closing, I will say that I resent that you are now driving

away

> > people from this list serve that are so helpful and

resourceful. My

> > family and others that have already protested their exit, will

suffer

> > in their absence. And it is not right that we should be

deprived of

> > their insight and experience simply because you cannot control

> > yourself.

> >

> > I agree that this list has taken a wrong turn here with all the

> > drama. And I would appreciate if you could stop antagonizing

list

> > members here with your bullying so that we can all get back to

> > learning and helping one another.

> >

> > Jeni Lynn

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >