Guest guest Posted January 3, 2008 Report Share Posted January 3, 2008 If you teach him ASL I'd consider the signing time videos because they go beyond signing by repeating the word and the way they are presented encourages reading as well, at least that was true of the ones I bought three years ago. If sound production is an issue have you considered dietary stuff? Milk elimination seems to help with allergy kids that are undetected on tests and for metal kids. My son was both metallic and allergic I believe and milk was a big find. Eliminating/reducing artificials is good for all kids, not just neuro-impaired. Reverse Osmosis filtered drinking and cooking water is great as well as is filtered bathing water. I spent $1200 on the wrong therapy last year. I spent less than that on the things listed above, along with using unrefined coconut oil and cooking at lower temps and using it sporadically as a moisturizer. In doing so I think my son has been transformed. It happened so fast it was scary and I thank God I was unable to afford to do it all at once as it may have caused such a shock that he could have been harmed. My next investments are NACD and The Listening Program. He is aging out of EI and that is my plan. I pray it works and I wish you and your child great success. Do not ever give up. Teach him the signing to get him a voice but don't resign yourself to the belief that signing is the stopping point. He is capable of more and you can get that for him. Hang tough! > > my son is 3 1/2 yrs old is apraxic. we have taught him Sign Exact > English he knows about 150 or so because he is hearing but not talking. > A month ago he started preschool, I have made them a book of the signs > he knows she knows ASL but is willing to learn SEE. I am wondering if I > should teach him ASL. There are so many videos, books etc out there > about ASL and he will be using sign for along time and I have heard > that SEE and ASL is about 20% similar so if trys to talk to someone > that uses the other sign language there are different means. Does > anyone have any info or suggestions for me. thank you. > G. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 G: My son is 7 and has been signing since 2. We use both ASL (because we attend classes at the Atlanta Area School for the Deaf) and SEE (because we are an English-speaking family and hope to be on the path toward full English literacy) as our low tech means of alternative/augmentative communication (AAC). If we were a Spanish-speaking family, we probably would just use ASL as the spoken Spanish language is most like ASL. (This is why it is so hard for Spanish-speaking persons to learn English and so easy for them to learn ASL.) Of course, doing so would (I believe) decrease our ability to achieve full English literacy. Although the literate deaf do not use SEE for conversation, they do know and understand it. Our usage of SEE eased my son's transition to his AAC device this past year, in that he already had a basic understanding of syntax and common verbs, articles and prepositions that are generally not used in ASL. This is not the case, however, for the English illiterate deaf or the Spanish literate deaf. I believe it is very important to evaluate and consider your son's long-term abilities and goals in making decisions on forms of AAC to use. If you want him to learn to read and expect that he will have the ability to do so, I encourage you to NOT stop using SEE as a low tech form. I also encourage you to get an evaluation for a high tech form of AAC for your son as soon as possible. I hope our experience helps you in making you decision on how best to proceed with a low tech form of AAC for your son. Lora From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of summertime41 Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:57 AM Subject: [ ] new to group question about signing my son is 3 1/2 yrs old is apraxic. we have taught him Sign Exact English he knows about 150 or so because he is hearing but not talking. A month ago he started preschool, I have made them a book of the signs he knows she knows ASL but is willing to learn SEE. I am wondering if I should teach him ASL. There are so many videos, books etc out there about ASL and he will be using sign for along time and I have heard that SEE and ASL is about 20% similar so if trys to talk to someone that uses the other sign language there are different means. Does anyone have any info or suggestions for me. thank you. G. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 My daughter is 6 and uses ASL to communicate. Her verbal apraxia is sever and she to date has only 5 understandable words. We tend to sign in more of an English word order than in true ASL form because she is hearing. I debated the use of SEE, but out on West Coast - the use of SEE is very limited so it really would not help her communicate with anyone. When we are working on English and reading, we do alot of fingerspelling for reading of words that there are not ASL equivilants and she is mainstreamed most of her day in a regular ed class with a signing aide. None of the deaf programs in our area would accept her because she is not deaf and our district is small and does not have a DHH program. It is not a perfect system by any means, but she is making great progress. I try to have her interact in the deaf community whenever I get a chance. We also try to pair signs with sounds as often as possible for those vocal that she has. The good news is that the more she signs and communicates the more she is attached to the communication process, which is so important. She is really trying hard to use her vocals now... Time will tell for all of our kids, but in the mean time, sign allow for a much more idependent lifestyle for her and communication then did any of our other augmentitve choices. Good luck > > G: My son is 7 and has been signing since 2. We use both ASL (because we > attend classes at the Atlanta Area School for the Deaf) and SEE (because we > are an English-speaking family and hope to be on the path toward full > English literacy) as our low tech means of alternative/augmentative > communication (AAC). > > > > If we were a Spanish-speaking family, we probably would just use ASL as the > spoken Spanish language is most like ASL. (This is why it is so hard for > Spanish-speaking persons to learn English and so easy for them to learn > ASL.) Of course, doing so would (I believe) decrease our ability to achieve > full English literacy. > > > > Although the literate deaf do not use SEE for conversation, they do know and > understand it. Our usage of SEE eased my son's transition to his AAC device > this past year, in that he already had a basic understanding of syntax and > common verbs, articles and prepositions that are generally not used in ASL. > This is not the case, however, for the English illiterate deaf or the > Spanish literate deaf. > > > > I believe it is very important to evaluate and consider your son's long-term > abilities and goals in making decisions on forms of AAC to use. If you want > him to learn to read and expect that he will have the ability to do so, I > encourage you to NOT stop using SEE as a low tech form. I also encourage > you to get an evaluation for a high tech form of AAC for your son as soon as > possible. > > > > I hope our experience helps you in making you decision on how best to > proceed with a low tech form of AAC for your son. > > Lora > > > > From: > [mailto: ] On Behalf Of summertime41 > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:57 AM > > Subject: [ ] new to group question about signing > > > > my son is 3 1/2 yrs old is apraxic. we have taught him Sign Exact > English he knows about 150 or so because he is hearing but not talking. > A month ago he started preschool, I have made them a book of the signs > he knows she knows ASL but is willing to learn SEE. I am wondering if I > should teach him ASL. There are so many videos, books etc out there > about ASL and he will be using sign for along time and I have heard > that SEE and ASL is about 20% similar so if trys to talk to someone > that uses the other sign language there are different means. Does > anyone have any info or suggestions for me. thank you. > G. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.