Guest guest Posted February 15, 2003 Report Share Posted February 15, 2003 Lori wrote: > Pouch management is easy. Head management is something else again. > > ~~ Lyn > Boy did that statement hit home. I have always believed that most of > my obesity was a head thing. It was not the food calling my name. It wasn't lack of willpower. I often ate without even thinking. I " think " that makes it a head thing at least for me. -- Lori, my therapist and I were talking about this very thing last week. Let's see if I can summarize. I was saying that in our family, food was not really about " comfort " , since a) my mother was a terrible cook for the most part, and my parents were very rigid about food, only shopping on a certain day of the week, and insisting that what they bought during that one trip should last a family of 5 until the next shop. They bought the cheapest foods available, and never bought enough fruits and veggies, etc. Thus, I remember searching through the kitchen in the couple of days before shopping day, eating things like ketchup sandwiches on white bread. My therapist pointed out that while food wasn't really " comfort " for me in the " here, dear, have some nice cake and feel better, " it felt like a survival issue. I.e., eat hearty while there's any food around, because you never know when your competitors (i.e., the rest of my family) will beat you to it, and you'll be left to starve. (Incidentally, of the three kids, my brother is the only one who has never been overweight -- and he was the one who'd steal away with the few " treat " foods my parents would buy, under the guise of " keeping us from hogging them " . Of course, my sister and I would find the empties once he'd " protected " us from them. Gee, thanks!) So in adulthood, food was one of the few ways I had of dealing with my internal " hunger " -- only it didn't work. It never really made me feel better, just fuller and sicker. I always had the idea that it *would* help, but because it was, in fact, JUST FOOD, it could never fill up the emotional emptiness, could never provide the emotional comfort that I hoped it would. For that, I needed to look to the humans in my life, but because I had been taught early on that you can't depend on humans to give comfort, I never really thought of that as a viable alternative. Just never occurred to me to ask for a hug instead of skulking off to find the nearest bag of marshmallows or whatever. The problem with using food as a companion, comforter, friend, etc., is this: *it just doesn't work*. Doesn't matter how much of it I could suck in, it just never did the job. And because I wasn't fully aware that I expected it to help in that way, I kept eating more. You know, the old idea that if what you're doing doesn't work, do it more or do it better, and then it will? Problem is that if your basic premise is flawed, no matter how much or how good the food is, it's just not going to do what you expect it to. It's a bit like being in a relationship with a sociopath or an alcoholic (and I've tried both) -- you can try all you like, but you are not going to be able to *make* that person into a good partner. They, for whatever reason, just cannot do it. They can never really be there for you, never really give of themselves in the way that makes a truly good relationship. Neither can food. Lately, as I worry about the possibility of allowing myself to slide back into that tortured relationship with food again, I've been thinking about some of my oldest assumptions. What if (gasp!) I just ask for a hug when I need comfort? Of course, the first step is identifying the need for comfort, which usually seems to manifest, in me, as a wish to eat something sweet. But when I'm able to do it, and it works, it feels like such a triumph. And when that happens, I'm able to allow myself to hope that, having found my " new body " underneath all those layers of fat, I might, perchance, be able to hang onto it, and not let it, or myself, get buried again. (And if you managed to wend your way through that rather convoluted syntax, you should win a prize of some sort!) I. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> RNY September 19, 2001 Dr. Freeman, Ottawa General Hospital BMI then: 43.5 BMI now: 22 -152 lbs <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2003 Report Share Posted February 15, 2003 Lori wrote: > Pouch management is easy. Head management is something else again. > > ~~ Lyn > Boy did that statement hit home. I have always believed that most of > my obesity was a head thing. It was not the food calling my name. It wasn't lack of willpower. I often ate without even thinking. I " think " that makes it a head thing at least for me. -- Lori, my therapist and I were talking about this very thing last week. Let's see if I can summarize. I was saying that in our family, food was not really about " comfort " , since a) my mother was a terrible cook for the most part, and my parents were very rigid about food, only shopping on a certain day of the week, and insisting that what they bought during that one trip should last a family of 5 until the next shop. They bought the cheapest foods available, and never bought enough fruits and veggies, etc. Thus, I remember searching through the kitchen in the couple of days before shopping day, eating things like ketchup sandwiches on white bread. My therapist pointed out that while food wasn't really " comfort " for me in the " here, dear, have some nice cake and feel better, " it felt like a survival issue. I.e., eat hearty while there's any food around, because you never know when your competitors (i.e., the rest of my family) will beat you to it, and you'll be left to starve. (Incidentally, of the three kids, my brother is the only one who has never been overweight -- and he was the one who'd steal away with the few " treat " foods my parents would buy, under the guise of " keeping us from hogging them " . Of course, my sister and I would find the empties once he'd " protected " us from them. Gee, thanks!) So in adulthood, food was one of the few ways I had of dealing with my internal " hunger " -- only it didn't work. It never really made me feel better, just fuller and sicker. I always had the idea that it *would* help, but because it was, in fact, JUST FOOD, it could never fill up the emotional emptiness, could never provide the emotional comfort that I hoped it would. For that, I needed to look to the humans in my life, but because I had been taught early on that you can't depend on humans to give comfort, I never really thought of that as a viable alternative. Just never occurred to me to ask for a hug instead of skulking off to find the nearest bag of marshmallows or whatever. The problem with using food as a companion, comforter, friend, etc., is this: *it just doesn't work*. Doesn't matter how much of it I could suck in, it just never did the job. And because I wasn't fully aware that I expected it to help in that way, I kept eating more. You know, the old idea that if what you're doing doesn't work, do it more or do it better, and then it will? Problem is that if your basic premise is flawed, no matter how much or how good the food is, it's just not going to do what you expect it to. It's a bit like being in a relationship with a sociopath or an alcoholic (and I've tried both) -- you can try all you like, but you are not going to be able to *make* that person into a good partner. They, for whatever reason, just cannot do it. They can never really be there for you, never really give of themselves in the way that makes a truly good relationship. Neither can food. Lately, as I worry about the possibility of allowing myself to slide back into that tortured relationship with food again, I've been thinking about some of my oldest assumptions. What if (gasp!) I just ask for a hug when I need comfort? Of course, the first step is identifying the need for comfort, which usually seems to manifest, in me, as a wish to eat something sweet. But when I'm able to do it, and it works, it feels like such a triumph. And when that happens, I'm able to allow myself to hope that, having found my " new body " underneath all those layers of fat, I might, perchance, be able to hang onto it, and not let it, or myself, get buried again. (And if you managed to wend your way through that rather convoluted syntax, you should win a prize of some sort!) I. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> RNY September 19, 2001 Dr. Freeman, Ottawa General Hospital BMI then: 43.5 BMI now: 22 -152 lbs <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.