Guest guest Posted July 4, 2002 Report Share Posted July 4, 2002 Deryk, rosacea may well worsen from the increased skin sensitivity resulting from aggressive treatments such as peels -- but that's the inflammatory aspects of rosacea, the pinkness/redness from inflammation and papules/pustules, a consequence of breakdown from the protective skin barrier. But I don't see how increased skin sensitivity can quickly worsen the vascular components of rosacea such as the worsening flushing described. Does anyone? There are several other explanations for a temporal association between chemical peels and new/worsening rosacea. For example, whatever worsening condition led to using a peel, such as worsening acne, may have really been early mild rosacea. Alternatively, new or over-attention to one's face after experiencing irritation from the peel may lead to a diagnosis, while otherwise the early signs would have been missed or ignored. Finally, there are drug-induced rosacea, the mechanism of which I don't know or understand, nor am I convinced that this condition is properly named. Note that the NRS classification doesn't include steroid-induced rosacea. So it is theoretically possible that an inflammatory reaction to a drug or procedure results in a rosacea- like condition, but that's an inflammatory reaction, not real rosacea as NRS is now defining the term. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD > > Just wondering: I've mentioned before that my rosacea began within > months of starting treatment for acne vulgaris. I was first presribed > Neostrata solution (glycolic acid). I am wondering how many of you > can correlate their R beginnings with the use of chemical peels, > either daily or the concentrated intensive peels. > Deryk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2002 Report Share Posted July 4, 2002 Deryk, rosacea may well worsen from the increased skin sensitivity resulting from aggressive treatments such as peels -- but that's the inflammatory aspects of rosacea, the pinkness/redness from inflammation and papules/pustules, a consequence of breakdown from the protective skin barrier. But I don't see how increased skin sensitivity can quickly worsen the vascular components of rosacea such as the worsening flushing described. Does anyone? There are several other explanations for a temporal association between chemical peels and new/worsening rosacea. For example, whatever worsening condition led to using a peel, such as worsening acne, may have really been early mild rosacea. Alternatively, new or over-attention to one's face after experiencing irritation from the peel may lead to a diagnosis, while otherwise the early signs would have been missed or ignored. Finally, there are drug-induced rosacea, the mechanism of which I don't know or understand, nor am I convinced that this condition is properly named. Note that the NRS classification doesn't include steroid-induced rosacea. So it is theoretically possible that an inflammatory reaction to a drug or procedure results in a rosacea- like condition, but that's an inflammatory reaction, not real rosacea as NRS is now defining the term. Marjorie Marjorie Lazoff, MD > > Just wondering: I've mentioned before that my rosacea began within > months of starting treatment for acne vulgaris. I was first presribed > Neostrata solution (glycolic acid). I am wondering how many of you > can correlate their R beginnings with the use of chemical peels, > either daily or the concentrated intensive peels. > Deryk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.