Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 In a message dated 7/17/01 10:23:42 PM, duodenalswitch writes: << I'm very interested in your answer...I also am a carb eater so if this is true I'll have to talk to Dr. Baltasar about it. I don't want to run into the same thing if there is a way to do something before hand. I'm sorry you're so stressed. I know things like this can be very disheartening. Hang in there...You are doing great! >> Sherry: Sometimes I worry about this, too --- eating carbs and all. I was a real heavy carb eater as a pre-op (no pun intended LOL). Now, I focus on protein and really don't have room for an excessive amount of carbs like before. I do eat them, though. My situation is different from the original poster's, though - I have lost 50 pct of my excess weight (about 70) at five months out, even though it has seemed pretty slow up to now. I want to get down to 170 and started at 307. I'm now 236.... about 70 more lbs to go, man! AGH The halfway point is the worst!!!! I'm not totally sure whether or not certain people's body's will utilize carbs more efficiently (i.e. - store them) even after the DS. But, I do know that I had only lost 15 lbs at three weeks out (whereas others had lost 20-25) and I mainly ate PROTEIN with a passion. I had little if any carbs (absolutely no room for it!). So, I know that my loss was not as fast as others to begin with and the carbs were not even an issue at that point. I also have a 250 alimentary/100 cm common channel. I have been very satisfied with my loss and rate of loss (my skin has adjusted really well, I've felt great for the most part). BUT, I can obsess about it and wonder whether it will just 'slow down' or 'stop' whenever I'm on a plateau. My body really tends to fight the surgery and hangs on for dear life. Then, I get an extremely rapid loss for a few days and level out... once again. Sigh. I think you have some good questions -- I wish there was some more research about this topic and how carbs are processed, etc. You can try the real protein-intensive approach and see if it works... I'm not *totally* convinced that it's what one eats. I think each body really reacts differently and will go at it's own rate regardless..... all the best, lap ds with gallbladder removal January 25, 2001 five months post-op and still feelin' fabu! pre-op: 307 lbs/bmi 45 (5'9 1/2 " ) now: 236 (and still goin' down????) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 > I started out a lot heavier than you though, and am afraid I > might be more of a carb person than you are. Do you have any > idea how many carbs you get in a day? Have you ever tracked it? I do not restrict my carb intake at all. Let me share with you a portion of a private post I made to a friend recently who asked about my intake: " The longer I am post-op, the more SURE I am that I made the perfect choice for myself with the DS. I am a stubborn cuss when it comes to changing my diet. I am resistant to change, and just plain selfish, I guess, when it comes to not wanting to endure deprivation of any kind. All along, I have felt that I was " testing my limits " . I truly eat whatever I want, including liberal junk. None of this detracts from the fact that I'm mentally waiting/expecting/fearing regain. Only time will heal that fear, I guess. Meanwhile, I continue to stubbornly test my limits and I'll be damned if I'll change a thing that I'm doing just for the sake of trying to control the scale. I know I'm probably foolish to be so stubborn in refusing any food limits, but that is just me. At some point, if and when (and I pray the DS doesn't betray me!) I start to REALLY see a gain, I'll have to look at food restrictions. At this point though, I'm just at that precipitous place where I'm waiting to see what is going to happen. It's unnerving to say the least. So, ideas for you, I am not a role model! I'm the worst one to ask for how to change anything, cuz I have been going with the flow from day one and riding the DS wherever it wants to take me. Maybe it'll reassure you to know that someone as reckless as me is still doing OK. " So, there you go. I think, Sherry, that we can drive ourselves CRAZY trying to analyze things. Your configuration has been tried and true for many, many, many people! You sound like me in that you want to know the " whys " of things. You're stressing because you have a milestone coming up and that fear of failure is trying to get the best of you! You have lost 96 pounds in 5.5 months. It took me 8.5 months to reach to -100 pound mark. Try not to stress! (I know it's hard!) But I bet when you get near the 200lb. in your weight, you'll be amazed at the sizes you're wearing and how much smaller people perceive you to be, merely by virtue of having heavier bone mass or whatever it is that makes us formerly MO people able to carry a lot more weight in a more compact area than our never-been-MO friends. Hang in there. :::hugs::: You're doing great!!! I mean it! M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 38 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 > I started out a lot heavier than you though, and am afraid I > might be more of a carb person than you are. Do you have any > idea how many carbs you get in a day? Have you ever tracked it? I do not restrict my carb intake at all. Let me share with you a portion of a private post I made to a friend recently who asked about my intake: " The longer I am post-op, the more SURE I am that I made the perfect choice for myself with the DS. I am a stubborn cuss when it comes to changing my diet. I am resistant to change, and just plain selfish, I guess, when it comes to not wanting to endure deprivation of any kind. All along, I have felt that I was " testing my limits " . I truly eat whatever I want, including liberal junk. None of this detracts from the fact that I'm mentally waiting/expecting/fearing regain. Only time will heal that fear, I guess. Meanwhile, I continue to stubbornly test my limits and I'll be damned if I'll change a thing that I'm doing just for the sake of trying to control the scale. I know I'm probably foolish to be so stubborn in refusing any food limits, but that is just me. At some point, if and when (and I pray the DS doesn't betray me!) I start to REALLY see a gain, I'll have to look at food restrictions. At this point though, I'm just at that precipitous place where I'm waiting to see what is going to happen. It's unnerving to say the least. So, ideas for you, I am not a role model! I'm the worst one to ask for how to change anything, cuz I have been going with the flow from day one and riding the DS wherever it wants to take me. Maybe it'll reassure you to know that someone as reckless as me is still doing OK. " So, there you go. I think, Sherry, that we can drive ourselves CRAZY trying to analyze things. Your configuration has been tried and true for many, many, many people! You sound like me in that you want to know the " whys " of things. You're stressing because you have a milestone coming up and that fear of failure is trying to get the best of you! You have lost 96 pounds in 5.5 months. It took me 8.5 months to reach to -100 pound mark. Try not to stress! (I know it's hard!) But I bet when you get near the 200lb. in your weight, you'll be amazed at the sizes you're wearing and how much smaller people perceive you to be, merely by virtue of having heavier bone mass or whatever it is that makes us formerly MO people able to carry a lot more weight in a more compact area than our never-been-MO friends. Hang in there. :::hugs::: You're doing great!!! I mean it! M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 38 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 Sherry.. I didn't answer because I COULDN'T.. I only know that the split between biliary & alimentary is 60:40, & my common channel is 100cm.. I plan to ask when I go for followup with my surgeon on the 20th, & I'll be happy to let you know then. I've been losing kinda slowly, too, but I'm telling myself it only means my skin will shrink rather than sag (I hope). I started at 397.6.. not sure where I am, now.. but when I can, I'll answer your question. I wasn't ignoring you.. I know you're very anxious (I'd be upset too.. my DS was the most painful even in my life), & I wish I could help. Hugs, Liane > Ok, I'm very upset right now. Mainly at the situation that put > me here with the Surgeon scandal that happened the day of my surgery, > but also because it seems people on here can't stop fighting long > enough to answer my question. > > Some of you answered with " you've lost 105 pounds and that is great; > just remember to get your protein first, vegetables second and > avoid carbs " . Now, I know your hearts were definitely in the > right place, but that is seriously not what I asked and I REALLY > need to know. > > PLEASE, how long is your alimentary limb?? I would especially > like to know this from Dr. Welker's patients. Also, how long > is it before they shorten it in surgery, if anyone knows?? > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > day of surgery! > > If I could eat all protein & vegetables and avoid carbs, I > wouldn't have needed this surgery in the first place. Carbs > are absorbed in the alimentary limb and to find out that mine > is longer than it should be is upsetting. > > I need to know how long most of them are made these days. It > would be comforting to hear of someone who started at my > weight (420) who made it down to goal with a 250cm alimentary > limb. But I don't think that's gonna happen. I think I > need a revision and that's INFURIATING. And I don't use that > word lightly. > > Please don't take offense to anything in this post. It's not > meant to inflame. I'm just trying to express how angry and > upset I am and that I *need* answers, please!! > > -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) > BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 > self-pay > 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old > Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts > Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! > Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! > http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 Sherry.. I didn't answer because I COULDN'T.. I only know that the split between biliary & alimentary is 60:40, & my common channel is 100cm.. I plan to ask when I go for followup with my surgeon on the 20th, & I'll be happy to let you know then. I've been losing kinda slowly, too, but I'm telling myself it only means my skin will shrink rather than sag (I hope). I started at 397.6.. not sure where I am, now.. but when I can, I'll answer your question. I wasn't ignoring you.. I know you're very anxious (I'd be upset too.. my DS was the most painful even in my life), & I wish I could help. Hugs, Liane > Ok, I'm very upset right now. Mainly at the situation that put > me here with the Surgeon scandal that happened the day of my surgery, > but also because it seems people on here can't stop fighting long > enough to answer my question. > > Some of you answered with " you've lost 105 pounds and that is great; > just remember to get your protein first, vegetables second and > avoid carbs " . Now, I know your hearts were definitely in the > right place, but that is seriously not what I asked and I REALLY > need to know. > > PLEASE, how long is your alimentary limb?? I would especially > like to know this from Dr. Welker's patients. Also, how long > is it before they shorten it in surgery, if anyone knows?? > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > day of surgery! > > If I could eat all protein & vegetables and avoid carbs, I > wouldn't have needed this surgery in the first place. Carbs > are absorbed in the alimentary limb and to find out that mine > is longer than it should be is upsetting. > > I need to know how long most of them are made these days. It > would be comforting to hear of someone who started at my > weight (420) who made it down to goal with a 250cm alimentary > limb. But I don't think that's gonna happen. I think I > need a revision and that's INFURIATING. And I don't use that > word lightly. > > Please don't take offense to anything in this post. It's not > meant to inflame. I'm just trying to express how angry and > upset I am and that I *need* answers, please!! > > -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) > BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 > self-pay > 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old > Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts > Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! > Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! > http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 I had my surgery on May 11th, my alimentary limb is 75cm, My surgeon was Dr.Keshishian, he is wonderful. I am a little over 2 months post op and have lost 57 pounds, but it seems to be slowing, and it is frustrating, but I am happy that it is going even if it seems slow.. A 250cm sounds long to me and you may not lose to quickly, and you may have to work harder, I dont blame you for being upset, I know i would be.. food is no longer a issue with me, I can take it or leave it, I now eat to live rather than live to eat.. loree __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 I had my surgery on May 11th, my alimentary limb is 75cm, My surgeon was Dr.Keshishian, he is wonderful. I am a little over 2 months post op and have lost 57 pounds, but it seems to be slowing, and it is frustrating, but I am happy that it is going even if it seems slow.. A 250cm sounds long to me and you may not lose to quickly, and you may have to work harder, I dont blame you for being upset, I know i would be.. food is no longer a issue with me, I can take it or leave it, I now eat to live rather than live to eat.. loree __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 oops when I replied earlier i was thinking of the common channel, which mine is 75cm, I am not sure of my alimentary limb.. Sorry for the confusion, it was all mine lol.. Loree __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2001 Report Share Posted July 17, 2001 oops when I replied earlier i was thinking of the common channel, which mine is 75cm, I am not sure of my alimentary limb.. Sorry for the confusion, it was all mine lol.. Loree __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 At 11:04 PM +0000 7/17/01, Sherry wrote: >... >The reason I want a lot of people to answer about what their >alimentary length is is to see if I am correct in my theory, >or just in a state of plateau-induced wacko-ness. >... > >Yes, I think I'm a big baby when it comes to plateaus, but I >also think I have a good reason for asking the questions I'm >asking. I just " wanna know " ! > >Thanks so much for your reply, I appreciate it! Sherry, You COULD be on a plateau. I was on a 2-week one that drove me crazy back in June. I am one of those standard 250/100 lap patients. We are all going to make it! --Steve -- Steve Goldstein, age 61 Lap BPD/DS on May 2, 2001 Dr. Elariny, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Virginia Starting (05/02/01) BMI = 51 BMI on 07/17 = 43 (-48 lb) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 At 11:04 PM +0000 7/17/01, Sherry wrote: >... >The reason I want a lot of people to answer about what their >alimentary length is is to see if I am correct in my theory, >or just in a state of plateau-induced wacko-ness. >... > >Yes, I think I'm a big baby when it comes to plateaus, but I >also think I have a good reason for asking the questions I'm >asking. I just " wanna know " ! > >Thanks so much for your reply, I appreciate it! Sherry, You COULD be on a plateau. I was on a 2-week one that drove me crazy back in June. I am one of those standard 250/100 lap patients. We are all going to make it! --Steve -- Steve Goldstein, age 61 Lap BPD/DS on May 2, 2001 Dr. Elariny, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Virginia Starting (05/02/01) BMI = 51 BMI on 07/17 = 43 (-48 lb) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Sherry - My ailmentary limb is 250 cm and my common channel 75 cm. It took me 10 months to reach goal weight. You're gonna do great! Kris G Cincinnati, Ohio5'7", 40 years old8/22 - 283 - BMI 44.306/22 - 144 - BMI 22.6Reached goal set by Dr. of 147 at 9 months/3 wks.ciao to 139 lbs. & 139.75 inches in 10 monthsOpen BPD/DS 08/22/00Bowel obstruction surgery 4/21/01Dr. Maguire, Kettering OHHumanaFreedom Plus Planiwillbefit@... http://www.newlifeteams.org Re: Alimentary Limb - Please Answer! Dear Sherry: I am also 250cm and it took me 19 months to lose all my weight not one year. I also have to tell you I still don't own a scale and during those 19 months I only weighed myself once a month at the most and if I was ever on a plateau I am not aware of it as I did not worry about it. I trusted the surgery to do what Dr. Anthone said it would and it did. I ate lots of protein and never denied myself anything I wanted including carbs but then as now I still crave protein first, I eat any veggies I have a taste for, I eat potatoes or yams or rice of some kind for dinner each night and I eat something sweet everyday although I had no taste for sweets until I was around 19 months out except for regular Coke. Try to relax and give your body a chance to do what it is supposed to do then if there is a problem then you can decide on your next step. Huggles, Tiger Lake Female 160 lbs. BMI 21.7 224lbs gone 165 1/2 inches gone 6' -- 53yrs young Dr. Anthone@USC So. Calif. Open DS Surgery 1/13/99 384lbs BMI 51.21 Last Visit 4/20/99 315.5 BMI 42.07 7/19/99 274.8 BMI 36.64 9/03/99 259.3 BMI 34.54 10/04/99 252.4 BMI 34.02 10/25/99 231 BMI 32 12/17/99 217.5 BMI 30.2 01/19/00 211 BMI 28 02/20/00 195 BMI 26 04/08/00 182.9 BMI 25 Hernia repair on 06/07/00 Dr. Anthone Tummy Tuck & Breast Reduction Dr. Downey 06/07/00 160 BMI 21.7 01/08/01 164.3 BMI 21.7 Total Weight Loss! 224.1lbs GONE! Total inches lost 154.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Sherry - My ailmentary limb is 250 cm and my common channel 75 cm. It took me 10 months to reach goal weight. You're gonna do great! Kris G Cincinnati, Ohio5'7", 40 years old8/22 - 283 - BMI 44.306/22 - 144 - BMI 22.6Reached goal set by Dr. of 147 at 9 months/3 wks.ciao to 139 lbs. & 139.75 inches in 10 monthsOpen BPD/DS 08/22/00Bowel obstruction surgery 4/21/01Dr. Maguire, Kettering OHHumanaFreedom Plus Planiwillbefit@... http://www.newlifeteams.org Re: Alimentary Limb - Please Answer! Dear Sherry: I am also 250cm and it took me 19 months to lose all my weight not one year. I also have to tell you I still don't own a scale and during those 19 months I only weighed myself once a month at the most and if I was ever on a plateau I am not aware of it as I did not worry about it. I trusted the surgery to do what Dr. Anthone said it would and it did. I ate lots of protein and never denied myself anything I wanted including carbs but then as now I still crave protein first, I eat any veggies I have a taste for, I eat potatoes or yams or rice of some kind for dinner each night and I eat something sweet everyday although I had no taste for sweets until I was around 19 months out except for regular Coke. Try to relax and give your body a chance to do what it is supposed to do then if there is a problem then you can decide on your next step. Huggles, Tiger Lake Female 160 lbs. BMI 21.7 224lbs gone 165 1/2 inches gone 6' -- 53yrs young Dr. Anthone@USC So. Calif. Open DS Surgery 1/13/99 384lbs BMI 51.21 Last Visit 4/20/99 315.5 BMI 42.07 7/19/99 274.8 BMI 36.64 9/03/99 259.3 BMI 34.54 10/04/99 252.4 BMI 34.02 10/25/99 231 BMI 32 12/17/99 217.5 BMI 30.2 01/19/00 211 BMI 28 02/20/00 195 BMI 26 04/08/00 182.9 BMI 25 Hernia repair on 06/07/00 Dr. Anthone Tummy Tuck & Breast Reduction Dr. Downey 06/07/00 160 BMI 21.7 01/08/01 164.3 BMI 21.7 Total Weight Loss! 224.1lbs GONE! Total inches lost 154.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Sherry, I am seeing Dr. Welker for possible surgery in near future. Did u have Dr. Welker or did someone else do surgery on you. I acn't figure if you are mad at him or someone else. I need info as I am looking into this surgery soon and want to know how saticfied you were with welker. Terry Alimentary Limb - Please Answer! > Ok, I'm very upset right now. Mainly at the situation that put > me here with the Surgeon scandal that happened the day of my surgery, > but also because it seems people on here can't stop fighting long > enough to answer my question. > > Some of you answered with " you've lost 105 pounds and that is great; > just remember to get your protein first, vegetables second and > avoid carbs " . Now, I know your hearts were definitely in the > right place, but that is seriously not what I asked and I REALLY > need to know. > > PLEASE, how long is your alimentary limb?? I would especially > like to know this from Dr. Welker's patients. Also, how long > is it before they shorten it in surgery, if anyone knows?? > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > day of surgery! > > If I could eat all protein & vegetables and avoid carbs, I > wouldn't have needed this surgery in the first place. Carbs > are absorbed in the alimentary limb and to find out that mine > is longer than it should be is upsetting. > > I need to know how long most of them are made these days. It > would be comforting to hear of someone who started at my > weight (420) who made it down to goal with a 250cm alimentary > limb. But I don't think that's gonna happen. I think I > need a revision and that's INFURIATING. And I don't use that > word lightly. > > Please don't take offense to anything in this post. It's not > meant to inflame. I'm just trying to express how angry and > upset I am and that I *need* answers, please!! > > -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) > BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 > self-pay > 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old > Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts > Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! > Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! > http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Sherry, I am seeing Dr. Welker for possible surgery in near future. Did u have Dr. Welker or did someone else do surgery on you. I acn't figure if you are mad at him or someone else. I need info as I am looking into this surgery soon and want to know how saticfied you were with welker. Terry Alimentary Limb - Please Answer! > Ok, I'm very upset right now. Mainly at the situation that put > me here with the Surgeon scandal that happened the day of my surgery, > but also because it seems people on here can't stop fighting long > enough to answer my question. > > Some of you answered with " you've lost 105 pounds and that is great; > just remember to get your protein first, vegetables second and > avoid carbs " . Now, I know your hearts were definitely in the > right place, but that is seriously not what I asked and I REALLY > need to know. > > PLEASE, how long is your alimentary limb?? I would especially > like to know this from Dr. Welker's patients. Also, how long > is it before they shorten it in surgery, if anyone knows?? > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > day of surgery! > > If I could eat all protein & vegetables and avoid carbs, I > wouldn't have needed this surgery in the first place. Carbs > are absorbed in the alimentary limb and to find out that mine > is longer than it should be is upsetting. > > I need to know how long most of them are made these days. It > would be comforting to hear of someone who started at my > weight (420) who made it down to goal with a 250cm alimentary > limb. But I don't think that's gonna happen. I think I > need a revision and that's INFURIATING. And I don't use that > word lightly. > > Please don't take offense to anything in this post. It's not > meant to inflame. I'm just trying to express how angry and > upset I am and that I *need* answers, please!! > > -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) > BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 > self-pay > 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old > Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts > Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! > Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! > http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Hi Sherry, I just want to add to Tom's already (as always) excellent post. The original Scopnaro procedure used 250cm alimentary limb and 50cm common limb. Most patients did very well with that, but a few lost too much weight and had problems with protien malnutition. Dr. Scopinaro tried increasing the stomach size to help reduce the incidence of protien malnutrtion. It helped by reducing rates from about 15% to about 7%. Then he tried changing the length depending on the patietns location. Northern Italian patients (who eat meat as well as pasta) were given 200cm. However, Sourthern Italians were given 300cm alimentary limbs because they tend to have a diet that is almost exclusively pasta and other carbs (that region is poorer and can't affoard as much meat). The rate of protien malnutrition sunk to about 4%. Both groups did really well (I think there was only a few % points spread between the weight loss). Modern DS surgeons (Hess, Rabkin, Anthone et all) prefer to make the alimentary limb between 40-50% of the total channel length. Hess and Rabkin use 40% as their rule, Anthone uses 50%. Dr. Anthone states that he prefers to keep the stomach small to better balance the restriction/malabsorption equation. Also, Hess uses a 10% length for the common limb rather than a fixed 50cm length. The average common limb seems to be around 75cm. Now that I have told you more then you want to know, the upshot is I agree with Tom. You limb length is probably OK. It may be a bit too short or too long based on the Hess approach, but not way off. I don't think it is soing to make that big a difference. Maybe a few pounds. Hull > > Hi Sherry: > > > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > > day of surgery! > > I don't blame you at all for being angry that they switched surgeons > on you without your knowledge. This strikes me as, at a minimum, > EXTREMELY unethical. > > With that said, I think you're needlessly worried about the > alimentary limb length. But before I get into that, I want to make > sure we're talking about the same thing. > > The alimentary limb carries food from the stomach and delivers it to > the " common " limb. According to Dr. Hess, (who created the surgery > we commonly refer to as " the DS " ), the alimentary limb should be 40% > as long as the original length of the entire small intestine. > > Dr. Hess' followup study includes 342 women. (I'm ignoring the men > because you're a gal.) Among those 342 women, the pre-op lengths of > their small intestines ranged from 473 cm to 997 cm, with an average > length of 707 cm. Using Dr. Hess' 40% rule, this means that he left > these 342 women with alimentary channels ranging from 189 cm to 398.8 > cm, with the average patient receiving an alimentary channel length > of 282.8 cm. Your length of 250 cm is well within this range. > > Also, you should note that most docs who perform the surgery by lap > don't measure the small intestine. Instead, they use a " standard " > length for the alimentary limb. I'm not sure about the rest of them, > but I'm pretty sure that the New York docs led by Dr. Gagner use a > 250 cm standard common channel. This is exactly the same length as > your common channel. > > I say all of this advisedly, because I don't know how long your small > intestine was prior to your surgery. > > HTH > > Tom > > Panniculectomy, Dr. Anthone, 11/10/2000 > Open DS, Dr. Anthone, 03/30/2001 > 11/10/2000 . . . 386 > 03/30/2001 . . . 360 > 04/19/2001 . . . 338 > 05/03/2001 . . . 328 > 05/18/2001 . . . 316 > 06/03/2001 . . . 301 > 06/15/2001 . . . 299 > 06/25/2001 . . . 293 > 07/03/2001 . . . 286 > 07/16/2001 . . . 278 > 108 Ugly Pounds, GONE FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > USC DS Support Group: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ds_usc> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Hi Sherry, I just want to add to Tom's already (as always) excellent post. The original Scopnaro procedure used 250cm alimentary limb and 50cm common limb. Most patients did very well with that, but a few lost too much weight and had problems with protien malnutition. Dr. Scopinaro tried increasing the stomach size to help reduce the incidence of protien malnutrtion. It helped by reducing rates from about 15% to about 7%. Then he tried changing the length depending on the patietns location. Northern Italian patients (who eat meat as well as pasta) were given 200cm. However, Sourthern Italians were given 300cm alimentary limbs because they tend to have a diet that is almost exclusively pasta and other carbs (that region is poorer and can't affoard as much meat). The rate of protien malnutrition sunk to about 4%. Both groups did really well (I think there was only a few % points spread between the weight loss). Modern DS surgeons (Hess, Rabkin, Anthone et all) prefer to make the alimentary limb between 40-50% of the total channel length. Hess and Rabkin use 40% as their rule, Anthone uses 50%. Dr. Anthone states that he prefers to keep the stomach small to better balance the restriction/malabsorption equation. Also, Hess uses a 10% length for the common limb rather than a fixed 50cm length. The average common limb seems to be around 75cm. Now that I have told you more then you want to know, the upshot is I agree with Tom. You limb length is probably OK. It may be a bit too short or too long based on the Hess approach, but not way off. I don't think it is soing to make that big a difference. Maybe a few pounds. Hull > > Hi Sherry: > > > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > > day of surgery! > > I don't blame you at all for being angry that they switched surgeons > on you without your knowledge. This strikes me as, at a minimum, > EXTREMELY unethical. > > With that said, I think you're needlessly worried about the > alimentary limb length. But before I get into that, I want to make > sure we're talking about the same thing. > > The alimentary limb carries food from the stomach and delivers it to > the " common " limb. According to Dr. Hess, (who created the surgery > we commonly refer to as " the DS " ), the alimentary limb should be 40% > as long as the original length of the entire small intestine. > > Dr. Hess' followup study includes 342 women. (I'm ignoring the men > because you're a gal.) Among those 342 women, the pre-op lengths of > their small intestines ranged from 473 cm to 997 cm, with an average > length of 707 cm. Using Dr. Hess' 40% rule, this means that he left > these 342 women with alimentary channels ranging from 189 cm to 398.8 > cm, with the average patient receiving an alimentary channel length > of 282.8 cm. Your length of 250 cm is well within this range. > > Also, you should note that most docs who perform the surgery by lap > don't measure the small intestine. Instead, they use a " standard " > length for the alimentary limb. I'm not sure about the rest of them, > but I'm pretty sure that the New York docs led by Dr. Gagner use a > 250 cm standard common channel. This is exactly the same length as > your common channel. > > I say all of this advisedly, because I don't know how long your small > intestine was prior to your surgery. > > HTH > > Tom > > Panniculectomy, Dr. Anthone, 11/10/2000 > Open DS, Dr. Anthone, 03/30/2001 > 11/10/2000 . . . 386 > 03/30/2001 . . . 360 > 04/19/2001 . . . 338 > 05/03/2001 . . . 328 > 05/18/2001 . . . 316 > 06/03/2001 . . . 301 > 06/15/2001 . . . 299 > 06/25/2001 . . . 293 > 07/03/2001 . . . 286 > 07/16/2001 . . . 278 > 108 Ugly Pounds, GONE FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > USC DS Support Group: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ds_usc> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer HUH??? My understanding of the DS is that we are not switched for carbs therefore the length of the alimentary limb would not matter. Sherry, I'd love to hear more about where you are getting this information. And to answer your question, my alimentary limb is 250. My common channel is 75. I had my surgery in Nov of 2000 with Dr. K. I started out at 353 and am now at 224, just about 130 pound loss. At 6 months out I had lost exactly 100 pounds--which is half the 200 I think I need to lose. Hope that helps and looking forward to hearing more about the alimentary limb and carbs. H __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > do because my alimentary limb is longer HUH??? My understanding of the DS is that we are not switched for carbs therefore the length of the alimentary limb would not matter. Sherry, I'd love to hear more about where you are getting this information. And to answer your question, my alimentary limb is 250. My common channel is 75. I had my surgery in Nov of 2000 with Dr. K. I started out at 353 and am now at 224, just about 130 pound loss. At 6 months out I had lost exactly 100 pounds--which is half the 200 I think I need to lose. Hope that helps and looking forward to hearing more about the alimentary limb and carbs. H __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 - The alimentary limb is where we absorb our carbs and it is shortened. That part I'm sure about. I asked recently and it was confirmed that we only absorb about 50% of the complex carbs we eat, thanks to the surgery. As far as my alimentary limb being longer than everyone else's, that's where I seem to be wrong. I went off half-cocked from something someone posted because of my " vulnerable " state at the time of dealing with a plateau (which I still am dealing with.) She said hers was too long and her surgeon agreed & that it would be shortened, but I'm not sure she was right about that exactly, because the response so far is that EVERY PERSON'S alimentary is 250cm after the surgery. You may not have had the switch for carb reasons, but that is part of why I had it. I wanted the malabsorption for fat as well as carbs, because I've always been a carb person and I know I always will be a carb person. I've never been that much a protein/fats person and I don't think I ever will be. I force the protein, but it's hard because I find protein too rich except for chicken. I've heard people say they take 2 pieces of meat and put a piece of cheese in the middle and eat it like a sandwich without the bread, but that just makes me gag because it would be so rich. I need the bread to " bland it out " or I won't be able to eat it at all! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > From: " Sherry " <shelters@f...> > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > do because my alimentary limb is longer > > HUH??? My understanding of the DS is that we are not switched for carbs > therefore the length of the alimentary limb would not matter. Sherry, > I'd love to hear more about where you are getting this information. > > And to answer your question, my alimentary limb is 250. My common > channel is 75. I had my surgery in Nov of 2000 with Dr. K. I started > out at 353 and am now at 224, just about 130 pound loss. At 6 months > out I had lost exactly 100 pounds--which is half the 200 I think I need > to lose. > > Hope that helps and looking forward to hearing more about the > alimentary limb and carbs. > > H > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 - The alimentary limb is where we absorb our carbs and it is shortened. That part I'm sure about. I asked recently and it was confirmed that we only absorb about 50% of the complex carbs we eat, thanks to the surgery. As far as my alimentary limb being longer than everyone else's, that's where I seem to be wrong. I went off half-cocked from something someone posted because of my " vulnerable " state at the time of dealing with a plateau (which I still am dealing with.) She said hers was too long and her surgeon agreed & that it would be shortened, but I'm not sure she was right about that exactly, because the response so far is that EVERY PERSON'S alimentary is 250cm after the surgery. You may not have had the switch for carb reasons, but that is part of why I had it. I wanted the malabsorption for fat as well as carbs, because I've always been a carb person and I know I always will be a carb person. I've never been that much a protein/fats person and I don't think I ever will be. I force the protein, but it's hard because I find protein too rich except for chicken. I've heard people say they take 2 pieces of meat and put a piece of cheese in the middle and eat it like a sandwich without the bread, but that just makes me gag because it would be so rich. I need the bread to " bland it out " or I won't be able to eat it at all! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > From: " Sherry " <shelters@f...> > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > do because my alimentary limb is longer > > HUH??? My understanding of the DS is that we are not switched for carbs > therefore the length of the alimentary limb would not matter. Sherry, > I'd love to hear more about where you are getting this information. > > And to answer your question, my alimentary limb is 250. My common > channel is 75. I had my surgery in Nov of 2000 with Dr. K. I started > out at 353 and am now at 224, just about 130 pound loss. At 6 months > out I had lost exactly 100 pounds--which is half the 200 I think I need > to lose. > > Hope that helps and looking forward to hearing more about the > alimentary limb and carbs. > > H > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Thank you it's always fascinating to " hear " (read) those things, and the more responses I get the better I'm feeling. Thanks a lot! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > > Hi Sherry: > > > > > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > > > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > > > day of surgery! > > > > I don't blame you at all for being angry that they switched > surgeons > > on you without your knowledge. This strikes me as, at a minimum, > > EXTREMELY unethical. > > > > With that said, I think you're needlessly worried about the > > alimentary limb length. But before I get into that, I want to make > > sure we're talking about the same thing. > > > > The alimentary limb carries food from the stomach and delivers it > to > > the " common " limb. According to Dr. Hess, (who created the surgery > > we commonly refer to as " the DS " ), the alimentary limb should be > 40% > > as long as the original length of the entire small intestine. > > > > Dr. Hess' followup study includes 342 women. (I'm ignoring the men > > because you're a gal.) Among those 342 women, the pre-op lengths > of > > their small intestines ranged from 473 cm to 997 cm, with an > average > > length of 707 cm. Using Dr. Hess' 40% rule, this means that he > left > > these 342 women with alimentary channels ranging from 189 cm to > 398.8 > > cm, with the average patient receiving an alimentary channel length > > of 282.8 cm. Your length of 250 cm is well within this range. > > > > Also, you should note that most docs who perform the surgery by lap > > don't measure the small intestine. Instead, they use a " standard " > > length for the alimentary limb. I'm not sure about the rest of > them, > > but I'm pretty sure that the New York docs led by Dr. Gagner use a > > 250 cm standard common channel. This is exactly the same length as > > your common channel. > > > > I say all of this advisedly, because I don't know how long your > small > > intestine was prior to your surgery. > > > > HTH > > > > Tom > > > > Panniculectomy, Dr. Anthone, 11/10/2000 > > Open DS, Dr. Anthone, 03/30/2001 > > 11/10/2000 . . . 386 > > 03/30/2001 . . . 360 > > 04/19/2001 . . . 338 > > 05/03/2001 . . . 328 > > 05/18/2001 . . . 316 > > 06/03/2001 . . . 301 > > 06/15/2001 . . . 299 > > 06/25/2001 . . . 293 > > 07/03/2001 . . . 286 > > 07/16/2001 . . . 278 > > 108 Ugly Pounds, GONE FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > USC DS Support Group: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ds_usc> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 Thank you it's always fascinating to " hear " (read) those things, and the more responses I get the better I'm feeling. Thanks a lot! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > > Hi Sherry: > > > > > > I'm so upset because when I eat a piece of bread and you eat > > > a piece of bread, *I* absorb more calories from it than you > > > do because my alimentary limb is longer because of my surgeon > > > being snatched out from under me (without my knowledge) on the > > > day of surgery! > > > > I don't blame you at all for being angry that they switched > surgeons > > on you without your knowledge. This strikes me as, at a minimum, > > EXTREMELY unethical. > > > > With that said, I think you're needlessly worried about the > > alimentary limb length. But before I get into that, I want to make > > sure we're talking about the same thing. > > > > The alimentary limb carries food from the stomach and delivers it > to > > the " common " limb. According to Dr. Hess, (who created the surgery > > we commonly refer to as " the DS " ), the alimentary limb should be > 40% > > as long as the original length of the entire small intestine. > > > > Dr. Hess' followup study includes 342 women. (I'm ignoring the men > > because you're a gal.) Among those 342 women, the pre-op lengths > of > > their small intestines ranged from 473 cm to 997 cm, with an > average > > length of 707 cm. Using Dr. Hess' 40% rule, this means that he > left > > these 342 women with alimentary channels ranging from 189 cm to > 398.8 > > cm, with the average patient receiving an alimentary channel length > > of 282.8 cm. Your length of 250 cm is well within this range. > > > > Also, you should note that most docs who perform the surgery by lap > > don't measure the small intestine. Instead, they use a " standard " > > length for the alimentary limb. I'm not sure about the rest of > them, > > but I'm pretty sure that the New York docs led by Dr. Gagner use a > > 250 cm standard common channel. This is exactly the same length as > > your common channel. > > > > I say all of this advisedly, because I don't know how long your > small > > intestine was prior to your surgery. > > > > HTH > > > > Tom > > > > Panniculectomy, Dr. Anthone, 11/10/2000 > > Open DS, Dr. Anthone, 03/30/2001 > > 11/10/2000 . . . 386 > > 03/30/2001 . . . 360 > > 04/19/2001 . . . 338 > > 05/03/2001 . . . 328 > > 05/18/2001 . . . 316 > > 06/03/2001 . . . 301 > > 06/15/2001 . . . 299 > > 06/25/2001 . . . 293 > > 07/03/2001 . . . 286 > > 07/16/2001 . . . 278 > > 108 Ugly Pounds, GONE FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > USC DS Support Group: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ds_usc> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 , thank you so much for sharing that and putting your private e-mail out here for us to read. I'm feeling better about this all the time, even though I'm still disappointed that the scale is still not moving. I've decided not to weigh for 1 month (my husband is going to help me ENFORCE that!) and if I still haven't lost anything, I will start to worry then. Thanks again! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > I started out a lot heavier than you though, and am afraid I > > might be more of a carb person than you are. Do you have any > > idea how many carbs you get in a day? Have you ever tracked it? > > I do not restrict my carb intake at all. Let me share with you a > portion of a private post I made to a friend recently who asked about > my intake: [snipt] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2001 Report Share Posted July 18, 2001 , thank you so much for sharing that and putting your private e-mail out here for us to read. I'm feeling better about this all the time, even though I'm still disappointed that the scale is still not moving. I've decided not to weigh for 1 month (my husband is going to help me ENFORCE that!) and if I still haven't lost anything, I will start to worry then. Thanks again! -Sherry (Lake Marcel, WA) BPD/DS Feb. 2, 2001 self-pay 5'5 " / 315 pounds / 33 years old Lost 9 pounds in pre-op weight loss efforts Have lost 96 pounds since surgery! Total of 105 pounds gone forEVER! http://www.fluffynet.com/wls/ > > > I started out a lot heavier than you though, and am afraid I > > might be more of a carb person than you are. Do you have any > > idea how many carbs you get in a day? Have you ever tracked it? > > I do not restrict my carb intake at all. Let me share with you a > portion of a private post I made to a friend recently who asked about > my intake: [snipt] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.