Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 > It is outlandish: > > 1) to tout the RNY as NOT malabsportive, because whether > RNY distal or > proximal, there is SOME malabsorption!! (and many are doing > distals, which > granted are different malabsorptions, but still malabsorption!!) This seems to be one of Dr. Rabkin's pet peeves too. Several times in his monthly meetings, I have heard him comment that docs who discourage the DS due to the its malabsorption are ignoring the fact that the RNY is also a malabsorptive procedure. M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 39 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... _________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 Yep, it sure quacks and walks like that duck! Business and Professions Code Sec. 17200 & following are pretty broad in scope. They wouldn't need to be for this outright falsehood. Best- Nick in Sage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 Yep, it sure quacks and walks like that duck! Business and Professions Code Sec. 17200 & following are pretty broad in scope. They wouldn't need to be for this outright falsehood. Best- Nick in Sage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.