Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Disturbing DS Article

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

, Sue's articles are very informative and definitely scary.

She lays out all the possibilities. This duodenal switch surgery is

not a quick fix for obesity; it is a very serious decision. It is a

decision to be made only if a person is morbidly obese and has tried

everything else. I qualified for weight loss surgery for over 20

years, but had not tried everything else and failed and did not have

the comorbidities staring me in the face. The one thing I have

learned in my years of dieting is that for me they do not work for

the long-term and being supermorbidly obese prevents me from being

able to participate in an exercise program as vigorously as I would

like. This surgery was the only hope for me. My insurance company

would not pay for the duodenal switch for me (although they were

considering the RNY). I only wanted the DS so I chose to go to Spain

and self-pay for this surgery. I have no regrets.

Sandy C.

DS Dr. Baltasar 5/31/01

-52 pounds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

You have to take anything Sue W. says with a grain of salt. You hit the

nail on the head that she " appears " knowledgeable. She is an advocate

against weight loss surgery and spews half truths and false statistics all

over the place. She will twist and turn an article around and definitely

has reading comprehension problems. Please make sure to check on any

reports she cites and see what they REALLY say. Also, be sure to ask for

cites on the information for which she hasn't provided them. I ran across

her website as a pre-op and it scared me too -- I preferred to make my

decision based on talking to people who actually had the surgery (Sue did

not) and interpreting the medical reports accurately.

You will want to research in depth before you decide if the surgery is right

for you. Because there ARE complications that could happen, but for me,

those risks were worth it, because I wasn't living life as a pre-op. Now, I

have my life back and its one of the best gifts I've ever received.

Take good care -

Kris G

Cincinnati, Ohio

5'7 " , 40 years old

8/22 - 283 - BMI 44.3

7/22 - 141 - BMI 22.1

Reached goal set by Dr. of 147 at 9 months/3 wks.

ciao to 142 lbs. & 149.75 inches in 11 months

Open BPD/DS 08/22/00

Bowel obstruction surgery 4/21/01

Dr. Maguire, Kettering OH

HumanaFreedom Plus Plan

iwillbefit@...

http://www.newlifeteams.org

Disturbing DS Article

| Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

| both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

| that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

| knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

| isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

| heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

| (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus a

| genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else read

| these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

| she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

| are are web sites:

|

| http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

|

| http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

|

| I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

|

| Take care,

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

| ----------------------------------------------------------------------

|

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, Sue is notorious in the WLS world for her never ending

misinformation, not just on the DS. She craves attention and

discussion, and this is a way she can get both. I too read those

articles, and much of what she is siting is based on the old BPD.

What ever you do, dont waste your time on her ramblings. She is

neither respected nor knowledgable. Meli

-- In duodenalswitch@y..., Porcia30@a... wrote:

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus

a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else

read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

>

> I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

>

> Take care,

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sue Widemark is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.. she is a

self-proclaimed " expert " on WLS, even though she herself has not had

any herself and she is not a surgeon, WLS nutritionist, nurse, or even

in the medical field. She is a know-it-all with a physician as a son,

& that is her big claim to " expertise " .. her son says so. I wonder if

her son practices medicine in Ahoskie, NC?? It would explain a LOT

about Kathy's doctor visit...

Don't take Sue seriously.. she just wants attention.. I corresponded

with her for a few months, and when I could provide citations from

medical journals time & time again that disproved her claims(and she

could not cite current literature that supported the same), she

finally just quit answering my emails. Save your anger for better

challenges... Sue will never change her mind, no matter how much

research she's shown.. because then she wouldn't get the attention.

My .02.

Liane

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

>

> I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

>

> Take care,

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 8/2/01 2:38:45 AM, duodenalswitch writes:

<< , Sue's articles are very informative and definitely scary.

She lays out all the possibilities. This duodenal switch surgery is

not a quick fix for obesity; it is a very serious decision. It is a

decision to be made only if a person is morbidly obese and has tried

everything else. >>

Yes, this is true but much of Sue's 'research' and her conclusions are off

base. I remember when I heard from her list that post-op DS had higher

pancreatic and stomach cancer rates. I did my own investigations and it

turns out that an antrectomy (partial gastrectomy involving the lower part of

the stomach and removal of the pyloric valve, which occurs in the older BPD

but NOT the BPD/DS) has a higher risk of pancreatic cancer. Gastric cancer

is rare but having stomach surgery (of any type) can be a risk factor. Other

factors include eating preserved foods/meats, etc.

Anyway, it turned out that her 'warnings' were pretty unfounded. Yes, the

surgery is relatively 'new' (even the RNY is in there isn't a whole lot of

info from 70 year olds + on how the surgery has affected their lives and

health). No, we don't know all the possible complications that can arise

from it. This is why we receive and must be committed to regular aftercare,

including extensive bloodwork panels, etc.

and myself have asked her several times to provide solid references

for her statements and she has YET to provide these. It is one thing to have

medical research that points to these facts when one states them. But, to

pull them from the air and not provide solid references for people to

continue their investigations makes me wonder about her motivations in

sharing her thoughts about the dangers of surgery with everyone, IMHO.

all the best,

Noverr-Chin

lap ds with gallbladder removal

January 25, 2001

Dr. Gagner/Mt. Sinai/NYC

co-moderator/duodenalswitch

pre-op: 307 lbs/bmi 45 (5'9 1/2 " )

now: 229

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 8/2/01 2:38:45 AM, duodenalswitch writes:

<< I ran across

her website as a pre-op and it scared me too -- I preferred to make my

decision based on talking to people who actually had the surgery (Sue did

not) and interpreting the medical reports accurately. >>

I think it's also important to note that many of the odd complications she

mentions are NOT backed up with post-op DS studies. Look at the studies done

on DS -- I think the longest are 10 year post-op studies. You can find them

at duodenalswitch.com.

Another thing to mention is that Sue thinks that she thinks the gastric

mini-bypass (the one WLS that many surgeons and specialists HAVE SAID is

potentially dangerous and has a direct connection with gastric cancer!) is

the best option... huh????? She chooses to ignore the solid evidence against

this procedure but prefers to propegate unsubstantiated claims about the DS

surgery. Go figure.

I'm not saying don't investigate -- read, read, read! Not all information is

going to come from your surgeon. This is a life-altering and rather

permanant experience so you want to be absolutely sure it is for you. There

are many risks involved with the surgery itself and even nutritional risks,

etc. as a post-op (if one does NOT maintain proper medical aftercare to

detect such deficiencies early and/or do not adhere to the supplementation,

etc.).

I actually posted a lot about gastric and pancreatic cancer and the DS on

this list --- I think all those references would be in the archives. :)

all the best,

lap ds with gallbladder removal

January 25, 2001

six months post-op and still feelin' fabu! :)

preop: 307 lbs/bmi 45 (5'9 1/2 " )

now: 229

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I found the article to be fair. I know you dont agree with me and

that's ok.. Im still going to have my DS done. That Sue doesnt agree

with this Sue that DS is a great thing..she can just stay fat. lol..

Its such an individual decision, that someone against something,

anything will find places to find negativity.. a well rounded, thought

out decision (informed in every way) is necessary when going under.. I

have done mine, and feel the risk is worth it..

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

>

> I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

>

> Take care,

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Anybody that has done extensive research on wls eventually runs into

Sue Widemark. She wants you to. She truly believes what she is saying

and like any evangelist will stop at nothing to " save " the lost. I

read her stuff because I wanted an all encompassing view, I cross

check what she claims as best I can (as I do with all info) and

ultimately think she is a scare monger. I don't understand her

agenda, but I have learned her words are poison to me. I now take

what she says with a grain of salt.

I just feel bad for the people who would greatly benefit from the

surgery and who see her site first and go no further. There are

always going to be Sue Widemarks in this world.

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus

a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else

read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

>

> I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

>

> Take care,

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Think of this woman as the National Enquirer of WLS, and that'll give

you an idea of how much credence to give her. She sensationalizes the

risks and presents them as if they are a fait accompli for anyone who

undergoes WLS. She rarely gives cites for her pulled-out-of-her-arse

statistics, and when she does, they are almost invariably based on an

incorrect reading on her part (she has a serious problem with reading

comprehension). Literally, almost everything that comes off her keyboard

is skewed and twisted to fit her agenda, and truth be damned. Although

she has the ability to write seemingly intelligently, it takes only a

small bit of discernment to see that her claims do not stand up to

scrutiny. She's best ignored.

> Disturbing DS Article

>

>

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

Take care,

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 08/02/2001 6:05:54 PM Central Daylight Time,

dreamweavergirlus@... writes:

<< I can no longer down a

can of diet coke in 15 minutes, 8 times a day. >>

Oh, but have faith because I am 15 months out and I CAN do this! And I am

very proud of it I might add!!!!

Dawn

Dr. Hess, Bowling Green, OH

BPD/DS

4/27/00

www.duodenalswitch.com

267 to 165

size 22 to size 10

have made size goal, weight goal may need to be adjusted.

no more high blood pressure, sore feet, or dieting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sue apparently is working with out of date data. she also needs to

do more research into DS and RNY becuase her facts are off. Sue

states " This surgery produces a slightly larger stomach pouch than

other gastric bypasses (about 4.5 oz) and leaves two inches of the

duodenum to stop dumping syndrome. " From the reading I have

done Dumping sydrome is cause by a lack the removal of the pyloric

valve. DS patients have an intact pyloric valve. She even says that

you can not have a peice of birthday cake. I can eat a slice of

cake but to be honest with you I would rather have a steak

smothered in cheese which has more calories but I don't have to

worry about that now. All I have to worry about as a Post-Op DS

patient is getting in enough protein, chewing my yummy regiment of

vitamins and drinking plenty of fluids.

DS has changed my life I do have to be more careful about what I

put in my body. But my cravings have changed to protein oriented

food. I am not interested in sweets as most of them contain chocolate.

And chocolate repulses me now. I have to make sure that I always

have my supplements with me. I premeasure my liquids to make sure

that I always take in atleast the minimum. I can no longer down a

can of diet coke in 15 minutes, 8 times a day.

In exchange for these changes I am now 40lbs lighter. I do not have

to some home and put my feet up for hours to relieve the swelling.

My foot swelling has disappeared. I no longer feel guilty after

eating. I am able to enjoy conversation at dinner because I am not

concentrating on stuffing as much food into my stomach as possible.

My fiance has joined the band wagon and has lost 9 pounds and is

building some pretty sexy muscles in his calves and thighs. I have

unwittingly finally succeeded at the Atkins diet which I tried 3

times pre-op before tossing it into the recycling bin. I am down a

size in clothing. I am fitting into chairs that I had to wedge

myself into just a couple of months ago. For the first time in my

life the more I eat the more I lose. I no longer feel constantly

thirsty, and contantly hungry. I can only drink about 6 ounces of

cofee a day. But for the first time in my life I am getting in 200+%

of the daily recommended calcium.

> Hi- I came across 2 articles by a woman named Sue Widemark. They

> both are rather disturbing because her tone in the articles suggest

> that she condemns this surgery but she tries to appear highly

> knowledgable on the topic. A lot of what she mentions I feel sure

> isn't true and she also mentions a few side affects that I hadn't

> heard about. She claims we will be more likely to get osteoperosis

> (which I can understand) but she also mentions Lupus. Isn't Lupus a

> genetic disorder that is most often inherited? Has anyone else read

> these before? I got very cranky after reading these, cause I think

> she is just using false data and rumors. What do you think? Here

> are are web sites:

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/nuwls_faq.htm

>

> http://www.users.qwest.net/~swidemark/wlswalk.htm

>

> I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on these articles.

>

> Take care,

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Think of this woman as the National Enquirer of WLS, and that'll

give

-

How could you be so insulting to the National Enquirer?

Nick in Sage - who is still grooming his flamed tailfeathers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> > Think of this woman as the National Enquirer of WLS, and that'll

> give

>

> -

>

> How could you be so insulting to the National Enquirer?

>

> Nick in Sage - who is still grooming his flamed tailfeathers

How about the Star? Weekly World News? :)

_________________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...