Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 HI SUSAN Sounds like you have a fine surgeon. The most important point for me in my decision to have the ds was..........AMOUNT OF WEIGHT KEPT OFF OVER THE LONG RUN " . My research indicated no procedure or diet nor drug works better than the bpd/ds!!!! I am 25 days postop, lap revised to open with only a 3 and 1/2 inch incision, but 8 hour surgery. Went back to work after two and a half weeks. Feel great, and am amazed how good everything is. Just saw Dr. Herron for three week check up and down almost 38 lbs. Wish you the best in you journey and remember..... How quick or easy, is not what is paramount. What takes the most weight off, keeps it off the longest, and has the best quality of life....is. regards dan berman > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. > > I finally saw my surgeon for a consult just last week. We talked a long > long time about the DS. We discussed the RNY very briefly and both > dismissed it. She brought up the lap band. She made it very clear that I > can have the DS if I want it. She also wanted me to consider the lap band, > and after thinking it over, I am going to go with that. Her stated reasons > were that I am not that large (288) and am about 140 lbs overweight, that DS > would lose about 85% of my excess weight and the band about 65% but that in > practical terms that means 120 lbs versus about 100 lbs (my math, not hers, > which is a heck of a lot better). I could have the DS. It is a major > operation, there can be complications, like leaks, which can be very > dangerous. I would be under general for 3-4 hours during surgery, spend 3-4 > days in the hospital and have it lap and have an excellent chance at a good > surgery without problems. I could do the lap band, be off the table in 1 > hour, out of the hopsital the next day, also do it lap. Procedure wise the > difference is considerable and if the band does not have the desired effect > I can get a DS in the future. > > I know there are considerable differences in terms of what you eat > afterward. A good friend who had a DS tells me that the DS is better suited > to how I like to eat. I am concerned about cormorbs (sleep apnea, > hypertension etc) more than losing extra weight for looks and this is a time > when I could handle the band and those restrictions easier than I could > handle a major abdominal surgery. > > Anybody have any advice? I'd appreciate any thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 I am not sure if this is the same procedure I read about, but I believe I read that a lot of people had to go back and have them removed. The bands were slipping and causing problems. Also that the weight is more likely to come back. It is almost unheard of for a DS person to gain their weight back. That is one of the main reasons I have chosen the DS. I haven't had the surgery yet, my date is in August. Good luck with your decision, Maggie > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. > > I finally saw my surgeon for a consult just last week. We talked a long > long time about the DS. We discussed the RNY very briefly and both > dismissed it. She brought up the lap band. She made it very clear that I > can have the DS if I want it. She also wanted me to consider the lap band, > and after thinking it over, I am going to go with that. Her stated reasons > were that I am not that large (288) and am about 140 lbs overweight, that DS > would lose about 85% of my excess weight and the band about 65% but that in > practical terms that means 120 lbs versus about 100 lbs (my math, not hers, > which is a heck of a lot better). I could have the DS. It is a major > operation, there can be complications, like leaks, which can be very > dangerous. I would be under general for 3-4 hours during surgery, spend 3-4 > days in the hospital and have it lap and have an excellent chance at a good > surgery without problems. I could do the lap band, be off the table in 1 > hour, out of the hopsital the next day, also do it lap. Procedure wise the > difference is considerable and if the band does not have the desired effect > I can get a DS in the future. > > I know there are considerable differences in terms of what you eat > afterward. A good friend who had a DS tells me that the DS is better suited > to how I like to eat. I am concerned about cormorbs (sleep apnea, > hypertension etc) more than losing extra weight for looks and this is a time > when I could handle the band and those restrictions easier than I could > handle a major abdominal surgery. > > Anybody have any advice? I'd appreciate any thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 My understanding is that 25 percent of the patients in the LAP-BAND trials had the band removed. That's a pretty high failure rate and one that makes me wonder why the FDA even approved it. L. > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. > > I finally saw my surgeon for a consult just last week. We talked a long > long time about the DS. We discussed the RNY very briefly and both > dismissed it. She brought up the lap band. She made it very clear that I > can have the DS if I want it. She also wanted me to consider the lap band, > and after thinking it over, I am going to go with that. Her stated reasons > were that I am not that large (288) and am about 140 lbs overweight, that DS > would lose about 85% of my excess weight and the band about 65% but that in > practical terms that means 120 lbs versus about 100 lbs (my math, not hers, > which is a heck of a lot better). I could have the DS. It is a major > operation, there can be complications, like leaks, which can be very > dangerous. I would be under general for 3-4 hours during surgery, spend 3-4 > days in the hospital and have it lap and have an excellent chance at a good > surgery without problems. I could do the lap band, be off the table in 1 > hour, out of the hopsital the next day, also do it lap. Procedure wise the > difference is considerable and if the band does not have the desired effect > I can get a DS in the future. > > I know there are considerable differences in terms of what you eat > afterward. A good friend who had a DS tells me that the DS is better suited > to how I like to eat. I am concerned about cormorbs (sleep apnea, > hypertension etc) more than losing extra weight for looks and this is a time > when I could handle the band and those restrictions easier than I could > handle a major abdominal surgery. > > Anybody have any advice? I'd appreciate any thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. , I think when you're considering two procedures that are so very different, it behooves you to really do some serious self-examination, in order to determine which method will best fit for your needs. The DS surgery does have the best reported percentage of excess weight loss maintained over the long term. At the same time, this procedure those include a malabsorptive component that requires lifelong diligence with regard to vitamin supplementation and aftercare. The DS surgery is comprised of a moderately restrictive component as well as a moderately malabsorptive component. The restriction is not nearly as extreme as you will have with the Lap-Band. Those of us choose the DS procedure generally do so because we feel that the postoperative quality of life is the best. We can truly live and eat very normally. I haven't lived the Lap-Band, so I can only give you my perception of the procedure and the reasons that I dismissed it for myself: 1.) I didn't want an extreme level of food restrictions. (Lap-Band enthusiasts may poo-poo this concern by saying that the band is adjustable to your level of comfort -- but honestly, what if your level of comfort with the band doesn't give you the weight loss you hope for? Then, you might be stuck feeling like you're on a diet forever. I would hate to be left having to choose between the lesser of two evils: unpleasant diet restrictions, or unsatisfactory weight loss. It's just not a place that I wanted to be after making the tough decision to go forward with WLS.) 2.) I simply wasn't comfortable with the idea of having a foreign material placed around and squeezing my stomach tissue. (I had read of too many ugly complications from band erosion, stomach erosion, etc. for my comfort.) 3.) The clinical data was not very compelling. The best percentage of long-term excess weight loss than I could turn up was something like 60%EWL, and a more often poorer than that. As I said, it's a very individual thing. The fact that the band was less invasive was attractive to me, but in the final analysis, I opted for the procedure that I felt would give me the BEST result. My age and diet history and self-analysis had a lot to do with it. I was 38 when I had this done, and I didn't want to find myself 5 years down the road looking back at a failed WLS and more years of my life wasted in failure mode. I knew that I was not a volume eater, so I was not convinced that a purely restrictive procedure would work for me. I have never been a " whole bag of cookies " person. I just had a body that held on to every morsel and turned it to fat! My never-been-fat sisters grew up with the same diet as me, yet they stayed thin. I took me a while to accept that I wasn't doing anything so wrong and bad! My bad diet choices were no worse than anyone else's bad choices in the world. I wasn't perfect, but my body wanted more than perfection. I would have had to be a paragon of diet virtue day in and day out in order to get or keep any weight off. I just didn't want to live that way. I was convinced that my metabolism was broken, and that the malabsorption was the fix that I needed. I didn't want an option that would make dieting easier; I wanted an option that would set me free with regard to food! Thank god, the DS procedure has been it for me. Now I'm getting verklempt. :-) But it's true. You need to sit down and honestly assess yourself. What type of eater are you. What do you need to succeed? What can you be happy living with forever and ever? For me, the idea of taking supplements and monitoring my blood lifelong was MUCH LESS scary than the idea of failing again. Maybe for you, you want to give the less invasive option a try and hope for the best, but be prepared to take a more " drastic " step if it doesn't pan out like you hope. Only you can make that decision. Best wishes to you -- please feel free to ask if you have any other questions on the DS. Hugs, M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 38 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... _________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2001 Report Share Posted July 22, 2001 , The lap band was only recently approved though it has been used in Europe for many years. The lap band is purely restrictive, and most restrictive procedures have problems with late weight gain. The VBG is infamous for late regain and even the RNY has some late regain. The BPD/DS has almost no late regain. Of cousre you can have the band removed and change to the BPD/DS down the road, but consider that revision surgery is much more difficult because of the adhesions. You chances of developing a leak if you do the BPD/DS as your first major surgery are almost nil. Dr. Anthone reports 1 leak on a " virgin " stomach out of over 600 procedures. The leak rate is several percent in revision surgery. Each procedure has its complications. The quick recovery time of the band is certianly attractive. I choose the BPD/DS because I only want to do this once. My wife had the Fobi pouch, and she has had some weight regain (not bad). My father-in-law also had the Fobi pouch and regained about 1/2 of his lost weight. He then converted had the procedure converted to a distal one, and he has all the " fun " of BPD/DS and RNY + Fobi! I guess the band is probably the easiest to revise. In that sense it I would prefer it over the RNY, since revision of that procedure to BPD/DS is very difficult. Good luck, Hull > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. > > I finally saw my surgeon for a consult just last week. We talked a long > long time about the DS. We discussed the RNY very briefly and both > dismissed it. She brought up the lap band. She made it very clear that I > can have the DS if I want it. She also wanted me to consider the lap band, > and after thinking it over, I am going to go with that. Her stated reasons > were that I am not that large (288) and am about 140 lbs overweight, that DS > would lose about 85% of my excess weight and the band about 65% but that in > practical terms that means 120 lbs versus about 100 lbs (my math, not hers, > which is a heck of a lot better). I could have the DS. It is a major > operation, there can be complications, like leaks, which can be very > dangerous. I would be under general for 3-4 hours during surgery, spend 3-4 > days in the hospital and have it lap and have an excellent chance at a good > surgery without problems. I could do the lap band, be off the table in 1 > hour, out of the hopsital the next day, also do it lap. Procedure wise the > difference is considerable and if the band does not have the desired effect > I can get a DS in the future. > > I know there are considerable differences in terms of what you eat > afterward. A good friend who had a DS tells me that the DS is better suited > to how I like to eat. I am concerned about cormorbs (sleep apnea, > hypertension etc) more than losing extra weight for looks and this is a time > when I could handle the band and those restrictions easier than I could > handle a major abdominal surgery. > > Anybody have any advice? I'd appreciate any thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 I have to agree with , I am surprised and disappointed in any surgeon that would move from the DS to a Lap Band. If your weight does not indicate a DS then the most reasonable medium would most likely be a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. For more information www.obesitysurgerybook.com G. Woodward, MPH, LCEP Live Light, Program Director Gulf Coast Medical Center Biloxi, MS 39531 1- www.gulfcoastmedicalcenter.com RE: DS or Lap band? > I am cross posting this to the DS and bandster lists in the hopes that > somebody can give me some insight. , I think when you're considering two procedures that are so very different, it behooves you to really do some serious self-examination, in order to determine which method will best fit for your needs. The DS surgery does have the best reported percentage of excess weight loss maintained over the long term. At the same time, this procedure those include a malabsorptive component that requires lifelong diligence with regard to vitamin supplementation and aftercare. The DS surgery is comprised of a moderately restrictive component as well as a moderately malabsorptive component. The restriction is not nearly as extreme as you will have with the Lap-Band. Those of us choose the DS procedure generally do so because we feel that the postoperative quality of life is the best. We can truly live and eat very normally. I haven't lived the Lap-Band, so I can only give you my perception of the procedure and the reasons that I dismissed it for myself: 1.) I didn't want an extreme level of food restrictions. (Lap-Band enthusiasts may poo-poo this concern by saying that the band is adjustable to your level of comfort -- but honestly, what if your level of comfort with the band doesn't give you the weight loss you hope for? Then, you might be stuck feeling like you're on a diet forever. I would hate to be left having to choose between the lesser of two evils: unpleasant diet restrictions, or unsatisfactory weight loss. It's just not a place that I wanted to be after making the tough decision to go forward with WLS.) 2.) I simply wasn't comfortable with the idea of having a foreign material placed around and squeezing my stomach tissue. (I had read of too many ugly complications from band erosion, stomach erosion, etc. for my comfort.) 3.) The clinical data was not very compelling. The best percentage of long-term excess weight loss than I could turn up was something like 60%EWL, and a more often poorer than that. As I said, it's a very individual thing. The fact that the band was less invasive was attractive to me, but in the final analysis, I opted for the procedure that I felt would give me the BEST result. My age and diet history and self-analysis had a lot to do with it. I was 38 when I had this done, and I didn't want to find myself 5 years down the road looking back at a failed WLS and more years of my life wasted in failure mode. I knew that I was not a volume eater, so I was not convinced that a purely restrictive procedure would work for me. I have never been a " whole bag of cookies " person. I just had a body that held on to every morsel and turned it to fat! My never-been-fat sisters grew up with the same diet as me, yet they stayed thin. I took me a while to accept that I wasn't doing anything so wrong and bad! My bad diet choices were no worse than anyone else's bad choices in the world. I wasn't perfect, but my body wanted more than perfection. I would have had to be a paragon of diet virtue day in and day out in order to get or keep any weight off. I just didn't want to live that way. I was convinced that my metabolism was broken, and that the malabsorption was the fix that I needed. I didn't want an option that would make dieting easier; I wanted an option that would set me free with regard to food! Thank god, the DS procedure has been it for me. Now I'm getting verklempt. :-) But it's true. You need to sit down and honestly assess yourself. What type of eater are you. What do you need to succeed? What can you be happy living with forever and ever? For me, the idea of taking supplements and monitoring my blood lifelong was MUCH LESS scary than the idea of failing again. Maybe for you, you want to give the less invasive option a try and hope for the best, but be prepared to take a more " drastic " step if it doesn't pan out like you hope. Only you can make that decision. Best wishes to you -- please feel free to ask if you have any other questions on the DS. Hugs, M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 38 Starting weight 299, now 156 Starting BMI 49.7, now 26.0 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10-19-99 http://www.duodenalswitch.com Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... _________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.