Guest guest Posted June 24, 2004 Report Share Posted June 24, 2004 Hi K, I'm an adult with RSS and I just wanted to put my two cents in about insurance. I know it might be *really* tempting not to disclose RSS to the insurance company, but personally, I wouldn't. I wouldn't for several reasons - chief among them being that if anything happens to her and someone (a doctor, nurse, etc.) happens to mention RSS in a claim, the company can (and probably will) deny to pay for her treatment based on the fact that she willfully witheld information from them. It is within the company's full legal right to do this even if the treatment is not RSS related. Now I know it seems like a long shot that the insurance company receives accidental disclosure, and it probably is, BUT there's still that chance. Especially in an emergency/urgent care type of situation. I worked for a legal center last year and we had a case where someone bought a life insurance policy without disclosing that they had a kidney condition and was then, unfortunately, killed in a car accident. The insurance company ended up not paying the premiums to the family because the deceased had willfully witheld information from the insurance company. The accident had absolutely nothing to do with the kidney condition, but there was nothing the family's laywers could do to make the insurance company hand over the premiums, because the individual who bought the policy from the company had bought it under false pretenses. Ok, that's just my two cents ... ~Hillary 21, RSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2004 Report Share Posted June 24, 2004 Hi Hillary, Thanks for you input. It's good advice. We weren't willfully holding back info. I guess that's why she was denied. Honesty is the best policy. K > Hi K, > I'm an adult with RSS and I just wanted to put my two cents in about > insurance. I know it might be *really* tempting not to disclose RSS > to the insurance company, but personally, I wouldn't. I wouldn't for > several reasons - chief among them being that if anything happens to > her and someone (a doctor, nurse, etc.) happens to mention RSS in a > claim, the company can (and probably will) deny to pay for her > treatment based on the fact that she willfully witheld information > from them. It is within the company's full legal right to do this > even if the treatment is not RSS related. Now I know it seems like a > long shot that the insurance company receives accidental disclosure, > and it probably is, BUT there's still that chance. Especially in an > emergency/urgent care type of situation. I worked for a legal center > last year and we had a case where someone bought a life insurance > policy without disclosing that they had a kidney condition and was > then, unfortunately, killed in a car accident. The insurance company > ended up not paying the premiums to the family because the deceased > had willfully witheld information from the insurance company. The > accident had absolutely nothing to do with the kidney condition, but > there was nothing the family's laywers could do to make the insurance > company hand over the premiums, because the individual who bought the > policy from the company had bought it under false pretenses. Ok, > that's just my two cents ... > ~Hillary > 21, RSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.