Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 P.S. Is my TSI high enough to skew my TSH results? (And, if so, in which direction - low?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2003 Report Share Posted November 6, 2003 Hi Jill, I'm reposting your main query but will only try to answer your follow-up note, about TSI (stimulating TSH receptor antibodies) affecting TSH: as I understand it, they will (eventually, as there's a lag time) lower TSH by increasing your thyroid levels. However, you may also have blocking TSH receptor antibodies, which can " cancel out " the TSI by having the opposite effect. The answer then is that you can't tell what effect the TSI are having unless you know the blocking level, too. I'll leave the rest of your post for more experienced feedback. I'm particularly confused myself about the relevance of TPO, which is the only test my endo ever ran for Graves' (mine started out high too). Best wishes Labs - questions I just got my latest labs - the FT4, FT3, and TSI that I had to fight for. The results are below, followed by most of my labs from most recent to oldest (when I was diagnosed 15 mos. ago). In general, my T4 and FT4 have both tested in the low-normal range once my hyperT was controlled, but my T3 and FT3 have been more mid-range or even high-normal - no apparent relationship to how I feel. Why would that be? I'm tempted in the future to only go for the FT4, not the FT3. What is the significance of the moderately elevated TSI? It is well out of the normal range, and over half of what it was at when I was quite hyper - but I definitely feel hypo now and have for months. I hadn't noticed before - the Thyroid peroxidase AB test on 10/17 - the results came back as " >70.0 " (0.0-2.0). Doesn't that mean it could be much higher? My orginal testing for this returned a value of 617. If this is still higher than reflected here, could that account for my feeling hypo? I plan to start on .025mg of Synthroid tomorrow morning. Does it really take weeks to notice a difference when starting hormone replacement? Thanks for any help, Jill 10/29/03 (felt hypo!) FT4 0.9 (0.8-1.8) T4 6.0 (4.5-12.0) FT3 307 (230-420) TSH 1.74 (0.40-5.50) TSI 188 (<125) - compared to my peak hyperT state, 8/02: 314 10/17/03 (felt hypo!) T4 6.7 (4.5-12) T3 126 (60-181) TSH 2.14 (0.40-5.50) Thyroid peroxidase AB >70.0 (0.0-2.0) Thyroglobulin AB 16.7 (<2.0) 7/30/03 (felt hypo!) FT4 0.9 (0.8-1.8) T3 164 (70-170) TSH 2.85 (0.40-5.50) (Felt my thyroid levels plummeting; went from 125mg of PTU to 100mg to 0mg in very short order.) 6/5/03 (felt middling to OK, but trending hypo; recent recovery from pneumonia) FT4 1.0 (0.8-1.8) T3 116 (70-170) TSH 1.77 (0.40-5.50) 12/23/02 (felt hypo) FT4 0.9 (0.8-1.8) T3 121 (70-170) TSH 1.21 (0.40-5.50) 11/6/02 (felt hypo) FT4 0.7 (0.8-1.8) T3 85 (70-170) TSH 1.03 (0.40-5.50) 9/25/02 FT4 1.2 (0.8-1.8) T3 - not done TSH undetected (0.40-5.50) (Started 300mg PTU at beginning of Sept.) 8/14/02 (felt very hyperT!!) FT4 2.5 (0.8-1.8) T4 13.2 (4.5-12) T3 242 (70-170) TSH undetected (0.40-5.50) TSI 314 (<125) Thyroid peroxidase AB 617 (0.0-2.0) Thyroglobulin AB 1444 (<2.0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2003 Report Share Posted November 6, 2003 > I'm reposting your main query but will only try to answer your follow-up note, about TSI (stimulating TSH receptor antibodies) affecting TSH: as I understand it, they will (eventually, as there's a lag time) lower TSH by increasing your thyroid levels. However, you may also have blocking TSH receptor antibodies, which can " cancel out " the TSI by having the opposite effect. The answer then is that you can't tell what effect the TSI are having unless you know the blocking level, too. > > I'll leave the rest of your post for more experienced feedback. I'm particularly confused myself about the relevance of TPO, which is the only test my endo ever ran for Graves' (mine started out high too). > > Best wishes > Thanks, . I did have the TPO test (results were on the second to last test results - below), which were out of the normal range, but very low compared to where they had been when I was first diagnosed with Graves. The numbers on the TPO were huge compared to the TSI; obviously " it doesn't work that way " , because I was hyper, not hypo. Now, with my TPO just a little high and my TSI still at over half the level when I was peak hyper, I'm hypo (by symptoms). -Jill > 10/29/03 (felt hypo!) > TSI 188 (<125) - compared to my peak hyperT state, 8/02: 314 > > 10/17/03 (felt hypo!) > Thyroid peroxidase AB >70.0 (0.0-2.0) > Thyroglobulin AB 16.7 (<2.0) > 8/14/02 (felt very hyperT!!) > TSI 314 (<125) > Thyroid peroxidase AB 617 (0.0-2.0) > Thyroglobulin AB 1444 (<2.0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2003 Report Share Posted November 6, 2003 Hi Jill, Several studies in the last few ones, particularly those by Brokken et al., show that the pituitary gland also recognizes TSI and also blocking TSH receptor antibodies as if they were TSH....similar to the way the TSH receptor protein on thyroid cells recognizes TSI as if these antibodies were TSH. When the pituitary mistakes TSI for TSH and thinks that you have adequate TSH in your blood, it stops secreting TSH so your TSH level is falsely decreased. For years, doctors knew that it could take a very long time for TSH to rise after one was hyperthyroid. Sometimes, TSH is not even produced until one is quite hypothyroid. It was thought that the pituitary was ineffective after being hyperthyroid, but with these new studies the reason for the lengthy TSH suppression is more fully understood. Dr. Utiger described Brokken's study in an article on the American Thyroid Association web site. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2003 Report Share Posted November 6, 2003 Hey Elaine, If I am reading Utiger's commentary correctly, he disagrees with Bokken's conclusion that TSI is a factor that inhibits TSH secretion. http://www.thyroid.org/professionals/publications/clinthy/clinthy_v141.pdf I'm really not sure if I'm reading it right. On a gut level, I think Bokken is right, perhaps because I am currently experiencing mid-range thyroid levels with a suppressed TSH while on no medication. At 04:41 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote: >Dr. Utiger described Brokken's study in an article on the American >Thyroid Association web site. Take care, Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.