Guest guest Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 In a message dated 11/19/2003 1:30:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, msolomonchik@... writes: Don't ask me not to discuss or have an opinion on RAI, however, as I have a strong and well-researched one. very best wishes and hope for all M. Solomon If you'd like to email me privately, I'd like to know why RAI isn't a good choice of treatment. I've been told it can effect nerves in the eye, and for patients with eye problems from GD, it's not a good choice, but what if you don't have eye problems? I went for a radiation treatment back in August and never felt anything from it. Since I had stopped taking my PTU before as requested, I didn't start to take the PTU afterwards, and it's why my levels are out of wack again. I want my thyroid to be " normal " again so I can have some surgery in the future, and I want to feel better too. What else can I do? My Dr says I may have to have another radiation treatment in a few months if I don't improve. Sincerely, Elise** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 To the moderator: Thank you so much for your service to us. I have been on this wonderful and helpful grouplist for 3 years now. The reason many of us get " emotional " when RAI is discussed is we have been put through literal hell with it being forced upon us as a cure, when it is presented as the " only thing " and the the huge potential down side is ignored. This is one of the only places in the *world* where this truth is explored and discussed.This treatment is not done as a matter of course in Europe and Japan and thus there are less people with eye disease and permanent hypo as a result. RAI as practiced curently in North AMerica is an imperfect and hastily rushed into treatment at best. Many people I know who have had surgery even, do better than post RAI patients in the long term, taking overallhealth into account. Elaine has explained why many times. I look at this current Medical Establishment Graves treatment situation as analagous to the maternity ward in the fifties where women were on an assmemly-line of no-choice-anesthetic, one-siz-e-fits-all delivery and no fatherly participation. Also Overuse of C-Sections. This only changed through discussikon and agitation, and the system and its doctors, etc. were dragged into the next century quite unwillingly. However, humane and educated childbirth has become standard practice. I will always be civil to everyone, and ignore trollers. I am sympathetic as can be with those who have had good faith in the prevailing mode of hasty permanent treatment and now find themselves feeling unwell, TED and other eye-disease ridden, bloated, exhausted and under-treated post RAI. Then they are told to shape up and seen once a year without being given the proper replacement. This scenario is repeated again and again and is only going to be fixed and amelitorated when the light of knowledge and experience shine on the whole prevailing system, and alternatives, such as intelligent long-tem use of ATD's, etc, are made known and patients are empowered. Just like I was by the existence of this wonderful group. Many of us (not me) *are *post RAI and have found life-altering and valuable information from this group. Don't ask me not to discuss or have an opinion on RAI, however, as I have a strong and well-researched one. very best wishes and hope for all M. Solomon _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos & pgmarket=en-ca & RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.ms\ n.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 I have a > strong and well-researched one. > very best wishes and hope for all > M. Solomon i would like to receive your well researched information as well. email me at leon_lz@... please. Much appreciated. Liang > To the moderator: > > Thank you so much for your service to us. I have been on this wonderful and > helpful grouplist for 3 years now. > > The reason many of us get " emotional " when RAI is discussed is we have been > put through literal hell with it being forced upon us as a cure, when it is > presented as the " only thing " and the the huge potential down side is > ignored. This is one of the only places in the *world* where this truth is > explored and discussed.This treatment is not done as a matter of course in > Europe and Japan and thus there are less people with eye disease and > permanent hypo as a result. RAI as practiced curently in North AMerica is an > imperfect and hastily rushed into treatment at best. Many people I know who > have had surgery even, do better than post RAI patients in the long term, > taking overallhealth into account. Elaine has explained why many times. > > I look at this current Medical Establishment Graves treatment situation as > analagous to the maternity ward in the fifties where women were on an > assmemly-line of no-choice-anesthetic, one-siz-e-fits-all delivery and no > fatherly participation. Also Overuse of C-Sections. This only changed > through discussikon and agitation, and the system and its doctors, etc. were > dragged into the next century quite unwillingly. However, humane and > educated childbirth has become standard practice. > > I will always be civil to everyone, and ignore trollers. I am sympathetic > as can be with those who have had good faith in the prevailing mode of hasty > permanent treatment and now find themselves feeling unwell, TED and other > eye-disease ridden, bloated, exhausted and under-treated post RAI. Then they > are told to shape up and seen once a year without being given the proper > replacement. This scenario is repeated again and again and is only going to > be fixed and amelitorated when the light of knowledge and experience shine > on the whole prevailing system, and alternatives, such as intelligent > long-tem use of ATD's, etc, are made known and patients are empowered. Just > like I was by the existence of this wonderful group. Many of us (not me) > *are *post RAI and have found life-altering and valuable information from > this group. > > Don't ask me not to discuss or have an opinion on RAI, however, as I have a > strong and well-researched one. > very best wishes and hope for all > M. Solomon > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photos & pgmarket=en-ca & RU=http% 3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket% 3den-ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.