Guest guest Posted July 7, 2001 Report Share Posted July 7, 2001 I will disagree with you. Altho the opening page does indicate that this list is " unmoderated and unrestricted " , if you scan thru the members list, you will find at least one owner and one moderator, because I just did. And in fact I am aware of at least one time when the owner/moderator did in fact delete messages which this person believed were not appropriate for this forum. It may be true that messages are not " moderated " before they appear in the list, however this list is in fact " moderated " in the sense that messages can be reviewed and/or deleted after they appear, and there is at least one person identified as " moderator " , as well as at least one identified as " owner " , in the member list. Therefore, it is my belief that this list actually is moderated, despite what the opening page indicates, altho you are free to disagree with my definition here. However, moderation is probably a good thing, because lists which do not have an owner and/or moderator, things can get very nasty without the availability of deleting messages which are offensive. My message here is again off-topic, so I do expect that it will also be deleted, as it is not in keeping with the " rules " . Perhaps I will even be removed from membership in this forum, for blatant rules violation, and I do not understand social nuances and things altho I do try, so I cannot say that I would blame the owner/moderator for removing my membership. But I did interpret your message here as a direct reply to my own message, even if you did not post it as a reply, and I do not like when I am directly challenged with information which I do not believe to be correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.