Guest guest Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 Hi Debbie, I can partially understand where you are coming from, as my Aunties say " Breast Cancer runs in the family " . All accounted for Aunties have had breast cancer as well as my only female cousin. So far, of the women we know of, I am the only one spared thus far. Add the fact that I am a DES Daughter, and you have the makings of a Nervous Nellie . I know you are searching the Internet for answers, and will see lots of sites. I have done the same . No reason to point you to any specific sites, as you most likely have seen them already. Plus, I am not an expert and like you, can only guess which information is accurate. I will list my personal conclusions, and perhaps as a group, more will fit together for us. ________________________________________________ I will never have another mammogram, for the exact reason you seem to believe. Squishing a cancer lump could cause it to spread. Cells could be disturbed. The fact is, there is no reason for this procedure, as an ultra sound will show if there are any other lumps. Once the results of the mammogram are presented to the doctor, they then say " yep... there is a lump... do a fine needle aspiration " . Where did that get us ? I would be asking what the false negative result possibilities are on this procedure. Then make a choice. With my family history, I personally would not trust a FNA. I do not know that numbers for breast lumps,and FNA false negatives. BUT... with thyroid nodules... one FNA only results in 10% false negatives. That means that if 100 of us were standing in a room, all with nodules, after they did FNA on all of us, there would still be 10 of us with the wrong answer. Then if a second FNA is done on these 10 people, only one would then have the wrong answer. I do not want to be that one person. So lets look at the odds factor in both situations. Our family history does put us at higher rink for breast cancer. Graves' disease increases the odds that a nodule could be cancerous. Using those two facts ( which can researched on Pub Med ) our choices in this situation take on a different tone. If I find a suspicious breast lump, I have already decided for ME, I will skip the normal tests, and go straight to removing the lump only and have them biopsy it while I am still on the table. I understand this takes a bit of set up, as they often do not do the biopsy until later. Then if it is cancerous, there is a second surgery needed. In the mean time, there is a very remote chance the cancer cells that have been disturbed could move to other parts of the body. Metastasize... (sp ?) I have not looked into what parts of the body breast cancer cells are most likely to metastasize, and that would be another thing you can bet I would be researching. I have been trying to learn this about thyroid cancer, and the people I have met, that have had this happen seem to have mostly lung or bone cancer. Please remember, I am no expert, only a very curious person. For ME, understanding these things gives me more power. The ability to make choices that I believe are correct for ME. Most people do not need to look further, they are confidant in their choices as is. I am frightened if I do not know all the possibilities up front. For ME, the situation you describe, is very fortunate. The location makes all of your choices much easier than if it was farther back entwined it the lymph nodes. In my imagination, you end up with a small scar there and complete confidence that they have not made any mistakes. We do know stress causes many problems. We do know that being too hypo increases cancer odds. All of my Aunties have been too hypo, on female replacement hormone, and under great stress. I choose to continue keeping my thyroid levels in the upper part of the range, and disregard TSH , as I have no idea what my antibodies are. You asked for our honest opinions, and that is all I have. I do not want to scare you, and that is NOT my intent. Data is power. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/medline.html Another possibility is view many breast cancer survivor groups this weekend, and find one that has intelligent women that are willing to be honest. Then mark a time to stop. Have a plan to do something with hubby. Walk away from this, and allow your body and mind to rest. -Pam L - 3 1/2 years Graves', TED, and PTU. Remission since Jan. 28th. 2002 ! Key: SLOW reduction of PTU (despite an incompetent endo ! ), eight hour dosing, improved lifestyle, REAL food/ no processed pre-made food, herbs, and looking at the big picture. Triggers are: MSG/any 'flavorings', glutamites ,aprartame, pesticides,high iodine foods. _____________________________________________________ Pills alone only help the symptoms. We must help our bodies to heal. _____________________________________________________ * " What a long, strange, trip it's been " ...Jerry .... Peace* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2003 Report Share Posted October 25, 2003 HI Debbie Please forgive the intrusion into your graves support group. I'm a friend of and she asked me to reply to your enquiry. I have breast cancer. That doesn't make me an expert, by any means but I am also the manager of a breast cancer dragon boat team in Hamilton Ontario. Therefore I do have a little more experience than most. (We have about 70 members, male and female, all ages from disgnosed at 21 to post menopausal diagnosis) The following is my opinion and mine only. All decisions are yours and yours only. Remember that when dealing with the oncology world. All lumps need to be investigated despite location, despite sex, despite age. Period. If the lump is very close to the chest wall (little fatty tissue aroundit) I agree mamogram would be tricky, not to say painful. Ultrasound does a good job in these situations. Needle biopsy is certainly a good option if the lump is near the surface and of palpable size. If the needle biopsy is inconclusive I would insist on excision and biopsy. But make the appointment with your family doctor immediately and push for a biopsy immediately as well. Do not hesitate to insist. This is your body and your life you are dealing with. Doctors do not necessarily know everything. Your family history although significant is not the main risk factor. Only 10 % of breast cancers have a genetic link that science can now detiremine. Your main risk factor is being female:) If you have any other questions or jsut want to chat please feel free to email. Paddles up! Charmaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2003 Report Share Posted October 26, 2003 Hi Debbie, {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ HUGS }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} I was just thinking about you and wondering where you had disappeared to! I m so sorry you have to worry and deal with yet another scary health problem. .. when IS enough enough already???? I don't have any advice for you but wanted to let you know I was thinking of you and putting out good health vibes for you that this turns out to just be another scare that you overcome quickly. (It does sound like the ultrasound/biopsy would be the way to go to start (would be for me anyway).) Hang in there and let us know how it goes! Love, Pam B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.