Guest guest Posted May 23, 2001 Report Share Posted May 23, 2001 Lolita wrote: Removing the foods which cause the problems is a sure fix. Hopefully there will be a time when it is better known whether enzymes can truly replace the diet, but until then I will treat this condition seriously enough to stick with what is proven. From M.: Lolita, isn't that just the point? There have not been double blind studies to prove the GFCF diet either, but you see what it does for your kids and you believe in it. Others see what the enzymes they are using (even with dietary infractions) are doing for *their* kids and they believe in that way of bringing up their young ones. I really think all of us must just decide for our own kids and keep the communications pathways open to telling others *why* we believe the way we do. But we should not cross the boundary of telling others that they must raise their children exactly the way we are raising ours. With respect, M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2001 Report Share Posted May 23, 2001 >Well, , I guess I'm looking at it from the perspective of celiac. I >think there has been enough experience with this diet to say it is proven, >from that stand point. And there seems to be a strong connection between >celiac and ASD. Many families who have one, have another, those with >celiac often have similar traits of ASD. I have one child with the >symptoms of celiac, a couple of others with ASD. So to me, it seems that >these conditions are related, especially when all improve with this diet. So, my argument for the diet is that it is proven in the celiac community, whereas enzymes are not. And I believe there is enough evidence for me, of a connection between ASD and celiac to say that until enzyme usage is proven to the celiac community it is best to remove the foods that are causing damage, for all my children. , I thought I was stating my opinion, the " why " I believe the way I do. I certainly did not mean to come off argumentative or insulting. If this is the way I appeared then please accept my apology. I'm quite sure those who use enzymes rather than diet believe that it is helping. But being that I believe as I have stated, I wouldn't recommend it to someone, so began this discussion. Perhaps it would be best that I not state my opinion, unless I am able to present others' opinions as well? Or maybe each of us can state our opinions without arguing? Lolita >Lolita wrote: >Removing the foods which cause the problems is a sure fix. Hopefully >there >will be a time when it is better known whether enzymes can truly replace >the diet, but until then I will treat this condition seriously enough to >stick with what is proven. > >From M.: >Lolita, isn't that just the point? There have not been double blind >studies to prove the GFCF diet either, but you see what it does for your >kids and you believe in it. Others see what the enzymes they are using >(even with dietary infractions) are doing for *their* kids and they >believe in that way of bringing up their young ones. I really think all >of us must just decide for our own kids and keep the communications >pathways open to telling others *why* we believe the way we do. But we >should not cross the boundary of telling others that they must raise >their children exactly the way we are raising ours. With respect, >M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.