Guest guest Posted August 3, 2004 Report Share Posted August 3, 2004 I have been reading the latest postings on the whole IUGR thing. I just wanted to add in my two cents, whether it will help or not, I don't know. But, we found out at 20 weeks that was small for gestation. His head was measuring pretty close to his gestational age, but the rest of his body lagged considerably. When I discussed this with my OB right afterwards, I asked if he would be a dwarf, she thought not since his limbs where proportionalte to his body, it was just his head was larger in proportion. I was sent to a specialist and they thought he would have Trisomy 18 based on what they where seeing in the ultrasounds. But, I did want you all to know, that they did extensive testing on me and . First of all, during some of the NUMEROUS ultrasounds I had while I was pregnant, they would look closely at the cord, and note the blood flow through it. I had a THREE vein cord, and he was getting what he needed through that based on the u/s. Also, immediately after I had , they took the cord and the placenta and sent it directly to a lab. They shipped it to somewhere that specializes in testing these things. They determined that indeed the cord was conducive to a healthy pregnancy, and the placenta was more than substantial for a healthy baby. So, I have yet to know what did go on, but to me that just points to genetics, and not the pregnancy environment. He had plenty of nutrition available to him, but there was just something else that hindered his growth. Anyone else have a similar situation? Anyone else have the testing on the cord and placenta after birth? I wish we could know for sure what the cause is. Maybe someday! Jodi R. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.