Guest guest Posted October 22, 2003 Report Share Posted October 22, 2003 This is an ambiguous statement. It does not mean that RAI does not exacerbate the eye symptoms. It could mean that any dose, large or small, may have contributed to the eye problems. At 04:46 PM 10/22/2003, you wrote: >In seven patients, Graves ophthalmopathy progressed after treatment, but >this progression was not associated with the dose used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2003 Report Share Posted October 22, 2003 All in the interpretation I agree. ________________________________________________ quote: This is an ambiguous statement. It does not mean that RAI does not exacerbate the eye symptoms. It could mean that any dose, large or small, may have contributed to the eye problems. At 04:46 PM 10/22/2003, you wrote: >In seven patients, Graves ophthalmopathy progressed after treatment, but >this progression was not associated with the dose used. __________________________________________________ The most disturbing aspect these, an other studies , is the huge variation in reported cases of worsening TED. Why this huge difference ? -Pam L- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.