Guest guest Posted April 7, 2005 Report Share Posted April 7, 2005 Some questions and a little venting. Got the MRCP I'd been waiting for ever since my January ERCP found panc duct too compressed to enter and was unable to drain my pseudocysts. Met with surgeon this week, but he would only say that its up to ME whether or not I want him to operate to drain the two largest cysts. Said I could consider symptoms I feel, such as discomfort, pain, nausea. i tried asking whether findings of ERCP & MRCP such as compression of duct and partial compression of doudenum would be a factor, but he just repeated his first statement. The report of March MRCP says largest cyst has a slight increase in size from last CT Scan Dec 04, and says its now 10.5 x 11.0 cm. The CT scan described the larger as 10 x 7.6 cm and a Nov 04 Ultrasound gives 3 dimensions: 10.6 x 7.8 x 4.8 cm. The March MRCP report says the smaller one is 3.8 x 3.5 cm. It says that's same size as in the earlier CT scan, but written report of that scan just gives one dimension, 5 cm and the u/s said 5 x 2.7 x7. These dimension differences may not be significant as I presume the techs or docs writing the reports may refer to the actual images in making comparisons. There also could be differences between technician's making the measurements or differences could be due to the more accurate picture MRCP gives over CT and U/S. It has been conjectured that the two cysts communicate, so I suppose one may even get smaller as other gets larger and that they also change shape. Incidentaly, previous scans said I have several other very small pseudocysts. I know from the literature that current practice is to base pseudocyst surgery decisions less on size and principally on symptoms, but I thought that " symptoms " could mean more than just those I can sense. Anyway, since I have no nausea and only one short bout of mild pain in last 3 months, the surgeon and I agreed to watch-and-wait, with a CT scan scheduled in 3 months. If that shows cysts continuing to increase in size, or i experience more symptoms than I do now, he said he'd recommend drainage. I realize that if I do experience significant pain again, there is no assurance that the cysts are the cause. In an accompanying post I ask about haitic hernia as a possible cause. At a previous visit I was told the surgery would involve at least a one week hospital stay. I was hoping to find out a little about the surgical method and what I might experience post-op, so i could be prepared to ask some intelligent questions at the time i have to make a decision, but he refused to discuss anything about it until i agree to the surgery. I finally got him to say whether drainage would be inside or outside body. He said it would be to the intestine. This confuses me, as I've been told one reason endoscopic drainage to stomach or doudenum is not feasible is because my cysts are not close enough to the stomach or doudenum walls. Has anyone had pseudocyst surgery done by cut from the outside but with drain placed to doudedum (or some other part of intestine) or can tell me how that might be done and what to expect? By this time I was pretty frustrated with having to make a decision with so little information, but realized I was not going to get anything else from the conversation. When the endoscopic specialist referred me back to the surgeon, she felt I should get cysts drained, and Heidi told me in December I should seriously consider that because of the possible consequences of a rupture of a large cyst, but agreed it was if a tough decision if little symptoms. I also realize my condition could revert to chronic at some time in the future. If its a factor, I am 65 years old, and always in good health until my acute attack last year. I have been told by another GI that my surgeon is best and maybe only pancreas specialist in our city, but if I can't get better communication I may want to get an opinion from another surgeon or pancreas specialist. Can anyone suggest one in Sacramento or the San Francisco area, especially one that communicates? Kurt (CA) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2005 Report Share Posted April 8, 2005 Kurt , I have the same problem with pseudocysts and was told that because of the location of mine endoscopic drainage is not possible. The only options that are available to me are to keep getting them aspirated (This drains the pseusdocyst and for me relieves the pain temporarily) or surgery. Have you tried to get the large pseudocyst aspirated because there is a chance that if they aspirate it, it will not return, but there is also a chance that if the pseudocysts are aspirated they will return larger then they were originally (that is what happens with me). I keep getting them aspirated tho to relieve the pain, but I am told that if I am not haveing major pain then the best thing to do with the pseudocysts is a " wait and see " approach. The surgery option was just explained to me at my last visit to the GI, he said that they will link the psuedocysts and in my case the tail odo the pancreas into my intestents in such a way that it drains there. This option is a major surgerical one, that takes a long recovery period. I don't know if this info helped at all, but I hope that it does a > > At a previous visit I was told the surgery would involve at least a one > week hospital stay. I > was hoping to find out a little about the surgical method and what I might > experience > post-op, so i could be prepared to ask some intelligent questions at the > time i have to > make a decision, but he refused to discuss anything about it until i agree > to the surgery. I > finally got him to say whether drainage would be inside or outside body. > He said it would > be to the intestine. This confuses me, as I've been told one reason > endoscopic drainage to > stomach or doudenum is not feasible is because my cysts are not close > enough to the > stomach or doudenum walls. Has anyone had pseudocyst surgery done by cut > from the > outside but with drain placed to doudedum (or some other part of > intestine) or can tell me > how that might be done and what to expect? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2005 Report Share Posted April 8, 2005 Kurt- I had a pseudocyst drained by Endoscopic Ultra Sound - Fine Needle Aspiration. (EUS/FNA) about a month ago at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco.It is suppose to be much easier on you than an ERCP. It was a pretty uncomfortable procedure. They didn't sedate me near enough to my liking! Dr Binmoeller did the procedure. My GI Dr in Redding sent me to him. I wasn't very impressed by him (of course I was so nervous about having the procedure done I forgot to ask the questions I had planned to ask). But, he didn't seem to be very communicative. I'm not really thrilled with my GI Dr either though. I was having pain & nausea before the procedure. Now I'm having more pain and nausea. I go in for another CT scan next week to see if it has come back or not. I'm considering going to Stanford. I've read that they have a good GI Department and that they treat a lot of pancreatitis cases. It sure would be nice not to have to play Dr roulette wouldn't it? Kimber gave me some Phone numbers of a couple of Drs in the bay area if you want them. Just e-mail me and I would be glad to give them to you. I hope the best for you, Rhonda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2005 Report Share Posted April 10, 2005 > Kurt , > I have the same problem with pseudocysts and was told that because of the > location of mine endoscopic drainage is not possible. The only options that > are available to me are to keep getting them aspirated > > The surgery option was just explained to me at my last visit to the GI, he > said that they will link the psuedocysts and in my case the tail odo the > pancreas into my intestents in such a way that it drains there. This option > is a major surgerical one, that takes a long recovery period. a, Do you know if this involves cutting & spicing intestine something like the whipple or beger procedures I've read about? If not, then as I said, I don't understand how my surgeon is expecting to drain my cysts to intestine. I was told earlier by my GI that one reason endoscopic drainage is out is because my cyst walls are too far from intestine or stomach. Maybe when they do operation by full surgery they can use some longer or more permanent type of stent than can be inserted endoscopically? Since surgeon is so uncommunicative, I did not ask about needle aspiration, but I'm pretty sure that's out because the MRI and CTs show my cysts contain heavy amount of debris which must be flushed out as part of the procedure. Kurt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.