Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 > The articles that I initially sent for proving that LPS, a bacterial > toxin, causes liver dysfunction were very advanced and unclear. To > someone who is not familiar with the topic, they might seem to not > have any thing to do with my assertion that LPS causes liver > dysfunction. I am sorry that I was rushed and sent unclear >articles. From just my point of view - don't ever apologize for sending along something 'advanced and potentially unclear'. If I need to figure something out I'll get it done. I'd rather work then get watered - down info. ly, the more eyes looking for info the better ;-) Plus, if you just send the links (as you have in this email) then anyone interested can save them to fiddle with on their own time. > > Since carefully reviewing my research this morning, I remain confident > that my information is correct. > The pertinent point is that LPS, a bacterial toxin, can cause liver > dysfunction. SCD starves out gram negative bacteria that produce LPS, so > implementing SCD could help since the liver is a major organ for > detoxification. It is clear that there is a huge amount of research > validating that LPS > does cause liver damage. I already cited proof in a previous posts. > Don't want to put words in Wil's mouth here, but I think his issue was the claim that " SCD Chelates " . Not " SCD by correct implementation will reduce/remove a harmful bacterial by-product that has a detrimental effect on normal liver function " . Two wholly different concepts. Don't mistake me, scd (with modifications specific for my son) is fanTAStic, and we certainly won't be revisiting gf etc. However. There are some asd children whose issues are deeper than *just* gut function (like my kiddo), and some families may have to branch out. It does not make diet any less important; just ain't the only iron in the fire. This is a btvc scd list, and it has been explained and understood that in the interest of focus btvc scd is THE topic on the table here. Which is cool, as there's a lot to it. But if other topics come up ****and are addressed onlist**** then I think either hearing other opinions/directing people specifically elsewhere is fair, OR immeadiately shutting down the convo without such claims with no specific backing. What do the moderators think? -christine (tx for links, btw - neat stuff :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 > > From just my point of view - don't ever apologize for sending along > something 'advanced and potentially unclear'. If I need to figure > something out I'll get it done. I'd rather work then get watered - > down info. ly, the more eyes looking for info the better ;-) > Plus, if you just send the links (as you have in this email) then > anyone interested can save them to fiddle with on their own time. Elaine worried about who would carry on research and I think she would be pleased with the work done by Mimi and Tamarro. Carol F. SCD7 years, celiac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Hi , Several years ago, when we first decided to make an SCD list for chuldren, we wanted to explore the following two issues: Is the yogurt OK for ASD kids? How do we combine SCD with other treatments? We wanted to rebel against the very restricted atmosphere of the official SCD list. (It was a list where the majority of members were adults with IBD). We did discuss these issues when we were a tiny list. I completely understand your feelings; that is why I rebeled against the LI listserve and wanted a new list. To make a long story short, we have been swamped with just helping folks do SCD. Maybe there should be a section on our website about other treatments. Anyone want to volunteer to write it? As soon as I wrote this, I realized how difficult it would be to assess the different treatments. How can we tell the difference between a phony treatment and a good one....It sure would take a lot of work... I think that right now, we need more active volunteers to run SCD. Only when we have more helpers can we even consider branching out..... Mimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 How about lifting material (with permission) about additional treatments from some of the DAN doctors who endorse SCD? - pecan post wrote: Hi , Several years ago, when we first decided to make an SCD list for chuldren, we wanted to explore the following two issues: Is the yogurt OK for ASD kids? How do we combine SCD with other treatments? We wanted to rebel against the very restricted atmosphere of the official SCD list. (It was a list where the majority of members were adults with IBD). We did discuss these issues when we were a tiny list. I completely understand your feelings; that is why I rebeled against the LI listserve and wanted a new list. To make a long story short, we have been swamped with just helping folks do SCD. Maybe there should be a section on our website about other treatments. Anyone want to volunteer to write it? As soon as I wrote this, I realized how difficult it would be to assess the different treatments. How can we tell the difference between a phony treatment and a good one....It sure would take a lot of work... I think that right now, we need more active volunteers to run SCD. Only when we have more helpers can we even consider branching out..... Mimi --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.