Guest guest Posted October 13, 2005 Report Share Posted October 13, 2005 Health Department Issues a Report on Birth Defect Cases in Immokalee, FL. Florida Agriculture Deparment Fines Company for Pesticide Violations. On October 12, 2005, the Collier County Department of Health (CCDH) released its investigative report on the three babies born with severe birth defects to farmworker women employed by Ag Mart in Immokalee, Florida. The three babies were born between December 2004 and February 2005. One has a cleft lip and small jaw (known as Pierre Robin’s syndrome), a second had multiple deformations and died within a few days and the third was born with no arms or legs. CCDH conducted a review of babies born in Immokalee between December 2004 and February 2005, to determine if they had birth defects due to exposure to agricultural pesticides. Of the five babies with birth defects born in that time frame, two had no possible exposure to agricultural chemicals and were eliminated from further study. In analyzing the possible environmental exposures to the three remaining babies, CCDH focused its assessment on the critical period of gestation, between 19 and 60 days after conception, when limbs and body structures are developing. During this critical timeframe, according to CCDH, two of the three mothers were exposed to agricultural pesticides that have been associated with birth defects in animal studies. Even though both these mothers were exposed to possibly teratogenic pesticides and many of these exposures occurred before it was safe to re-enter pesticide treated fields (i.e., before the required restricted entry interval had expired), CCDH concluded that it was unlikely that these effects were due to pesticide exposure. In reaching this conclusion, CDOH noted that generally health professionals are able to identify a case of only about 35% of birth defect cases (25% due to genetic causes and 10% from environmental causes). It was unlikely that the effects were due to an environmental cause. In reaching this conclusion, CDOH noted that the three cases involved different birth defects, that one of the mothers allegedly had no exposures during the critical time period and that while the birth defects rates in Collier County and Immokalee were higher than the state as a whole (28% and 33% higher respectively), this could be due to the small numbers of cases in those jurisdictions. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services found that Ag Mart had committed 88 violations of preharvest intervals and restricted entry intervals during th time period at issue and fined the company $111,000. , Deputy Directorof the Farmworker Justice Fund Inc. noted that CDOH conducted only a cursory investigation and that a more comprehensive study should be undertaken to identify the likely causes of these severe birth defect cases. The flaws in the CDOH study include the following: To identify a trend in the incidence of birth defects, CDOH should have looked at a broader time frame. Finding a trend in a three-month time window was extremely unlikely from the outset. A fuller investigation should have compared birth defect cases in Immokalee and other agricultural areas to the number of cases in urban areas in the state. By looking at a narrow three-month timeframe, CDOH ignored the birth of a fourth farmworker baby born in Immokalee with a cleft palate in the summer of 2005. CCDH accepted Ag Mart’s records of employment and pesticide application without question even though one of the farmworker moms disputes the dates of her employment with the company. This controversy is not even mentioned, nor are any reasons given for ignoring the mother’s account. If the mother’s account had been credited, she would have had exposure to the possibly teratogenic pesticides during the critical period of gestation. An acute exposure to one of the farmworker dad’s is dismissed because no incident report was filed. Given that pesticide incidents are widely underreported, this was an inappropriate conclusion. Given that at least two of the mothers were exposed to potentially teratogenic pesticides during a critical time of gestation – and that these exposures occurred before the expiration of the restricted entry interval – an analysis should have been conducted of the likely amount of exposure (i.e., dose). There is no discussion of the extent of exposure. Paternal exposures and the possibility of take home exposures to the moms was ignored. The poor pesticide safety record of this company was not mentioned. Only the farmworker parents were interviewed. Other Ag Mart workers should have been interviewed concerning the extent of pesticide safety violations on that farm. also praised Ag Mart for eliminating the use of five potentially teratogenic pesticides beginning in October 2005, but urged the company to eliminate the use of methyl bromide as well. She also urged other tomato growers to eliminate the use of such highly toxic pesticides in their operations. Finally, criticized the Florida Department of Health for its failure to undertake a comprehensive investigation of birth defect trends in Florida or to enlist the assistance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health in comprehensively investigating these severe birth defects cases. “The actions FDOH and CCDH propose to take are wholly inadequate to identify likely causes of birth defects among farmworkers in that state,” said . Deputy Director Farmworker Justice Fund, Inc. 1010 Vermont Avenue N.W. Suite 915 Washington, DC 20005 202-783-2628 Voice 202-783-2561 Fax www.fwjustice.org sdavis@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.