Guest guest Posted December 2, 2000 Report Share Posted December 2, 2000 To: Bells in OK I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. Betty Pappas MGB: 3/13/00 250/170/130 > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > offend anyone, but I don't > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > and would prefer not to > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > the MGB, to read > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > the group being " horny. " > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > them. Surely I'm not the > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > on this group giving > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > where it should go. He > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > person being " horny " it > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > something to broadcast. I > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > compelled to share my > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > Bells in OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2000 Report Share Posted December 2, 2000 To: Bells in OK I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. Betty Pappas MGB: 3/13/00 250/170/130 > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > offend anyone, but I don't > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > and would prefer not to > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > the MGB, to read > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > the group being " horny. " > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > them. Surely I'm not the > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > on this group giving > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > where it should go. He > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > person being " horny " it > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > something to broadcast. I > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > compelled to share my > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > Bells in OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2000 Report Share Posted December 2, 2000 Cleanliness, like piety, is a relative concept. In my opinion this is a very clean site, and I think my humor is in keeping with that. Could it be cleaner? Sure, but then where's the fun? Fact of the matter is that among the physiological and psychological changes wrought by this surgery or those of sexual desire and self-image. For many of us changes in this area is an important aspect of having this surgery. I think it fair to report -- in a non-offensive way -- on the changes we're experiencing in this area. I will continue to do so in my own PG way. May I suggest switching to individual e-mails? That makes it much easier to filter those messages you don't care to read. (That's what I've been doing since the option of reading on the web disappeared. It also eliminates the problem of hitting the reply button and getting a subject line such as above!) Best regards. > > To: Bells in OK > > I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion > off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can > be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should > be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop > reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's > anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is > impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. > > Betty Pappas > MGB: 3/13/00 > 250/170/130 > > > > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > > offend anyone, but I don't > > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > > and would prefer not to > > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > > the MGB, to read > > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > > the group being " horny. " > > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > > them. Surely I'm not the > > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > > on this group giving > > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > > where it should go. He > > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > > person being " horny " it > > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > > something to broadcast. I > > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > > compelled to share my > > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > > > Bells in OK > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2000 Report Share Posted December 2, 2000 Cleanliness, like piety, is a relative concept. In my opinion this is a very clean site, and I think my humor is in keeping with that. Could it be cleaner? Sure, but then where's the fun? Fact of the matter is that among the physiological and psychological changes wrought by this surgery or those of sexual desire and self-image. For many of us changes in this area is an important aspect of having this surgery. I think it fair to report -- in a non-offensive way -- on the changes we're experiencing in this area. I will continue to do so in my own PG way. May I suggest switching to individual e-mails? That makes it much easier to filter those messages you don't care to read. (That's what I've been doing since the option of reading on the web disappeared. It also eliminates the problem of hitting the reply button and getting a subject line such as above!) Best regards. > > To: Bells in OK > > I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion > off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can > be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should > be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop > reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's > anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is > impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. > > Betty Pappas > MGB: 3/13/00 > 250/170/130 > > > > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > > offend anyone, but I don't > > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > > and would prefer not to > > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > > the MGB, to read > > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > > the group being " horny. " > > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > > them. Surely I'm not the > > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > > on this group giving > > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > > where it should go. He > > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > > person being " horny " it > > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > > something to broadcast. I > > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > > compelled to share my > > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > > > Bells in OK > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 Jon, HOney.. Now, I thought we forgot all about this .. I know I did. Just be you. Lots of us loves you that way... (right Jude?) Trude Re: Digest Number 2566 Cleanliness, like piety, is a relative concept. In my opinion this is a very clean site, and I think my humor is in keeping with that. Could it be cleaner? Sure, but then where's the fun? Fact of the matter is that among the physiological and psychological changes wrought by this surgery or those of sexual desire and self-image. For many of us changes in this area is an important aspect of having this surgery. I think it fair to report -- in a non-offensive way -- on the changes we're experiencing in this area. I will continue to do so in my own PG way. May I suggest switching to individual e-mails? That makes it much easier to filter those messages you don't care to read. (That's what I've been doing since the option of reading on the web disappeared. It also eliminates the problem of hitting the reply button and getting a subject line such as above!) Best regards. > > To: Bells in OK > > I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion > off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can > be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should > be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop > reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's > anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is > impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. > > Betty Pappas > MGB: 3/13/00 > 250/170/130 > > > > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > > offend anyone, but I don't > > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > > and would prefer not to > > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > > the MGB, to read > > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > > the group being " horny. " > > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > > them. Surely I'm not the > > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > > on this group giving > > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > > where it should go. He > > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > > person being " horny " it > > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > > something to broadcast. I > > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > > compelled to share my > > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > > > Bells in OK > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 Jon, HOney.. Now, I thought we forgot all about this .. I know I did. Just be you. Lots of us loves you that way... (right Jude?) Trude Re: Digest Number 2566 Cleanliness, like piety, is a relative concept. In my opinion this is a very clean site, and I think my humor is in keeping with that. Could it be cleaner? Sure, but then where's the fun? Fact of the matter is that among the physiological and psychological changes wrought by this surgery or those of sexual desire and self-image. For many of us changes in this area is an important aspect of having this surgery. I think it fair to report -- in a non-offensive way -- on the changes we're experiencing in this area. I will continue to do so in my own PG way. May I suggest switching to individual e-mails? That makes it much easier to filter those messages you don't care to read. (That's what I've been doing since the option of reading on the web disappeared. It also eliminates the problem of hitting the reply button and getting a subject line such as above!) Best regards. > > To: Bells in OK > > I agree with you entirely. It has been said in the past to keep religion > off this e-groups, so why not keep it clean folks! Personal responses can > be made to individuals to their private e-mail addresses as well. We should > be able to discuss things without be offensive. Many times I just stop > reading the posts because I am offended by the discussions about someone's > anatomy, or other sexual innuendoes! Some of us get the digest, so it is > impossible to just delete one persons e-mail, as was suggested. > > Betty Pappas > MGB: 3/13/00 > 250/170/130 > > > > > > > This isn't a porn group is it? I don't mean to > > > offend anyone, but I don't > > > want to be offended either. I am a Christian woman, > > > and would prefer not to > > > read such as this. I joined the e-group because of > > > the MGB, to read > > > experiences about it. Not to read about someone in > > > the group being " horny. " > > > That's my feelings, and I felt that I should share > > > them. Surely I'm not the > > > only one that feels that way. I mean, I hear people > > > on this group giving > > > Praise to God for their surgery, and that's exactly > > > where it should go. He > > > has given Dr. R a gift. But when I read about a > > > person being " horny " it > > > makes me feel dirty to even read it. That isn't > > > something to broadcast. I > > > hope that I haven't offended anyone, but I felt > > > compelled to share my > > > thoughts and feelings. > > > > > > Bells in OK > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.