Was :'tweaking' . Now 'word choice and emotion'

[Guest guest]

>

>

> I especially get a little upset by those who suggest

the " tweaking " of SCd. SINCE we know that one does not have to, to

get the wonderful benefits of SCD.

>

Language is a tricky thing. I did not look up the pure definition

of " tweak " in online Webster, but I am sure some resourceful soul

could, should the spirit strike, lol.

Example; we're legal, and I do not consider feeding our son

within the parameters of SCD but 'our tweaks' (uh, choices)

blasphemy ;-) Extrodinarily limited nuts, seeds, beans, honey...

pastured meat, organic f/v (lots), raw dairy, enzymes (more than

one 'mito' kid on the block ;-), specific supps per Glenn's changing

needs. It works for Glenn, for now. I like what works ;-)

I think btvc scd is an excellent baseline, and no one seems to be

arguing that. " Just " diet success is great to read anywhere, be it

scd, gfcf, enz, 'only-green-beans-on-thursday'. Whatever. Some

people need to delve further into metabolics - not everyone has to

(great!), and some that have did not plan on it, initially.

If 'legality' is not a semantic issue, and kids are eating a

balanced diet...

Personally, I like reading (or at least looking into) the

literature suggestions of others (of course, anyhting other than

nursing school texts at this point are great, lol). Even if I wind

up with more q's than answers, or don't agree with some conclusions

drawn. Nice thing about a list - many POV's on one topic. It IS hard

to divorce word choices from emotion or assumption - esp in type. It

has been an interesting thread to follow.

-christine