Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 General anesthesia can not be used during any scoping of the throat. With general anesthesia one is sedated to the point they can not breathe for themselves and would have to be intubated. In other words, a breathing tube would have to be placed down the throat, there for, a scope tube would not have room. Conscious sedation can be done with as little meds as just versed and demerol or fentanyl. As what most of us would get if we were having a colonoscopy. Or conscious sedation can be done with an anesthesiologist directing an anestetist to give enough meds to bring the patient to th level of sedation just shy of requireing intubation. Registered Nurses can provide the conscious sedation using versed and demerol or fentanyl. However, when bringing the pt to the point just shy of intubation an anesthesiolgist and/or anestetist must be present in the event that breathing or cardiac function are impaired. This point of being sedated to the brink of intubation is the anesthesia 'good' pancreatologist doing an ERCP would use. Unfortunetly most times we as pats must request it. The patient would still be able to follow simple commands but would not remember. I hope this helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 , In my case I beg to differ. I was put under general anesthesia for all of my ERCPs - no doubt. I was intubated while they did the procedure. That was one of the reasons why the GI endoscopists elected to not go on with my therapy....he didn't liek the hassles of having a GA team in the endoscopy room. They never explained why I HAD to be GA'd (as opposed to conscious sedation) but all I know is that I was and it made for a more pleasant experience on the table if not in the PACU. No doubt, they used GA for me at two different institutions. They said it was because I was an unique case but didn't explain why that was so. So there are exceptions and I will make sure that I am always under GA if I ever have to do one again. laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 Chrissy, I'm another one like Laurie who was given general sedation for a scope several years ago. I told the GI that's the only way I'd consent to the procedure, since I've had a couple times on conscious sedation where I've woken mid-way through and totally freaked out. My GI was really ticked about having to do it that way, because it meant scheduling a special day at the hospital when he was normally at his alternate clinic, but I stood firm because of my own fears. So when they did my upper endoscopy a few years back, with a colonoscopy immediately following, they gave me general anesthesia which put me out entirely. It turned out to be that that's how I met my current Pain Management doctor, as he was the Anestheologist who sedated me before those procedures a few years ago. When I found out that my old PM doctor was moving out of state, I was delighted to find a new one who I'd met before and liked, even if it was only for the brief time it took to set me up, do those procedures and bring me back in the recovery room. With love, hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth SC Rep SE Regional Rep PAI Note: All comments or advice are based on personal experience or opinion only, and should not be substituted for consultation with your medical professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 I have endoscopy & colonoscopy procedures twice a year and I have general anaesthesia without incubation..well it is classed as general under all the forms I sign and the anaesthetist tells me it is.. They use Diprovan, which doesn't require intubation apparently, and one wakes up more alert and less drowsy and nauseous than using Versed & Fentanyl or Demerol.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 I am fairly certain that when I had my ERCP's done at University of Colorado that I had general anethesia. In fact, I always got to meet the Anestesialogist and they explained why they put me out and that they do indeed tube me. I have signed forms stating that I have been told of the risks involved with general anesthesia. Dr. Shah (my gastro) is the one who says he wants me completely out for the procedure. Of course, I have had these ERCP in outpatient surgery at the hospital...and I end up admitted to the hospital. But maybe because it is done at the hospital this is why I get general anesthesia? I have had endoscope ultrasound and a couple of celiac blocks done under conscious sediation...and I have woke up before while they are doing the procedure....NOT PLEASANT, to say the least! I would rather do general just because the potential of waking up during another one of those things is more than I want to think about!! Hugs, Suzi B. Colorado Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.