Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Sorry to chime in late on this. Yes, the CHIS is a great resource for looking at many California populations. Unfortunately, as a telephone survey, the CHIS may be less useful for the audience of this list serve as it only reaches a segment of the farm labor force. The CHIS results I’ve seen show farmworkers to be better off than they actually are. A great research project for someone is to do a systematic look at these differences. I’ve only seen analysis of selected variables done by others. From: Lighthall [mailto:david@...] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 12:47 PM Migrant_Health_Research Cc: emindel@... Subject: [bULK] - [ ] California's foreign born population To Mathew and others, I posed a question (see below) in respect to Mathew's recent request to Ask CHIS, CHIS being the California Health Interview Survey managed by UCLA. Mindel of Ask CHIS was so kind as to do a preliminary analysis in a very rapid turnaround--thanks much to ! Attached above are the results of his analysis. As you can see, the database is very impressive and the user interface is very friendly. Its an incredible resource for health researchers in CA and model for the rest of the country. PS to Mathew and others: You may want to provide us with more complete contact info when posting messages to the listserve. Best, Lighthall, Ph.D. Research Director Relational Culture Institute 3485 W. Shaw, Suite 103 Fresno, CA 93711 530 304-0038 mobile 559 276-2304 office 559 276-2304 fax david@... -----Original Message----- From: Mindel [mailto:emindel@...] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:26 AM Lighthall Subject: RE: AskCHIS News Alert - 2003 CHIS data is coming! , Thanks for your inquiry. The answer to both questions is yes, but with the caveat that " characterize the health " and " some legitimate conclusions " are both very subjective and general terms that may or may not be supported by CHIS data. Hence, the old warning that " your actual mileage may vary. " That said, for illustration I'm attaching 3 Excel files that I generated with CHIS 2001 data using the AskCHIS tool, located at http://www.chis.ucla.edu/main/default.asp These are just three CHIS topics of the hundreds available, each cross-tabulated for country of birth. A researcher or analyst would easily be able to build a series of such tables that are of interest, the sum of which should allow that person to draw health profile conclusions about foreign-born populations of California. At 10:50 AM 2/2/2005, Lighthall wrote: I have a question that was posed by someone on a health-related listserve: Can CHIS data be used to characterize the health of the foreign-born population of California? Do you ask that question and could statewide data be pooled to draw some legitimate conclusions on the basis of this population as a whole? Thank you, Lighthall, Ph.D. Research Director Relational Culture Institute 3485 W. Shaw, Suite 103 Fresno, CA 93711 530 304-0038 mobile 559 276-2304 office 559 276-2304 fax david@... -----Original Message----- From: AskCHIS@... [mailto:AskCHIS@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:52 PM david@... Subject: AskCHIS News Alert - 2003 CHIS data is coming! CHIS 2003 DATA RESULTS AVAILABLE ON AskCHIS FEBRUARY 7th The powerful features of AskCHIS 2.0 can soon be applied to multiple years of CHIS results! On February 7, 2005 AskCHIS will provide access to data from the 2003 cycle of CHIS. Nearly one hundred of the most demanded CHIS topics will be immediately available for 2003 data, with many more topics to follow in coming weeks. Many topics are identical in CHIS 2001 and 2003. AskCHIS users will be able to directly compare these topics in one table. Users may also choose to combine the 2001 and 2003 sample for these topics, which provides more stable estimates for smaller populations and averages out the differences between 2001 and 2003. POPULATION " WEIGHTS " REVISED FOR CHIS 2001 BASED ON CALIFORNIA DOF AskCHIS employs population " weights " to extrapolate respondents' answers to all of California's population. To allow comparisons with 2003 data, the CHIS 2001 weights were revised. In general, the revised weights may slightly change prevalence (percentage) estimates. Population (number) estimates may change more, especially for small population groups such as American Indian/Alaska Native. The CHIS weights are now based on population estimates from the California Department of Finance (DOF), which are updated more frequently than US Census estimates. This will also be used to weight future CHIS cycles. The new weights also account for socioeconomic variation in California's population. The new weights also mean AskCHIS can provide estimates at the county, region and state levels for Chinese, Filipinos, Koreans, and Vietnamese, for both 2001 and 2003. Data for smaller Asian ethnic groups will remain available for researchers in the CHIS Public Use Files. We thank all the supporters of CHIS 2003, and all the AskCHIS users who continue to make suggestions for improvements. If you have any questions, please feel free to reply to this email. And be sure to visit AskCHIS at http://www.chis.ucla.edu/main/default.asp?s=QB18426 beginning February 7 to get results from CHIS 2003! Sincerely, Mindel Web Development Manager UCLA Center for Health Policy Research Mindel Web Development Manager UCLA Center for Health Policy Research 10911 Weyburn Avenue, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90024 310-794-6963-tel 310-794-2686-fax emindel@... Website: http://www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu To Post a message, send it to: Groups To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: -unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2005 Report Share Posted February 9, 2005 Just a note: Because Mathew's question was about immigrants in Cal., rather than farmworkers, it was a great opportunity to draw on the CHIS data. I neglected to paste in Mathew's original question. -----Original Message-----From: Gabbard [mailto:sgabbard@...] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:34 PM Subject: RE: [bULK] - [ ] California's foreign born population Sorry to chime in late on this. Yes, the CHIS is a great resource for looking at many California populations. Unfortunately, as a telephone survey, the CHIS may be less useful for the audience of this list serve as it only reaches a segment of the farm labor force. The CHIS results I’ve seen show farmworkers to be better off than they actually are. A great research project for someone is to do a systematic look at these differences. I’ve only seen analysis of selected variables done by others. From: Lighthall [mailto:david@...] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 12:47 PMMigrant_Health_ResearchCc: emindel@...Subject: [bULK] - [ ] California's foreign born population To Mathew and others, I posed a question (see below) in respect to Mathew's recent request to Ask CHIS, CHIS being the California Health Interview Survey managed by UCLA. Mindel of Ask CHIS was so kind as to do a preliminary analysis in a very rapid turnaround--thanks much to ! Attached above are the results of his analysis. As you can see, the database is very impressive and the user interface is very friendly. Its an incredible resource for health researchers in CA and model for the rest of the country. PS to Mathew and others: You may want to provide us with more complete contact info when posting messages to the listserve. Best, Lighthall, Ph.D.Research DirectorRelational Culture Institute3485 W. Shaw, Suite 103Fresno, CA 93711530 304-0038 mobile559 276-2304 office559 276-2304 faxdavid@... -----Original Message-----From: Mindel [mailto:emindel@...] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:26 AM LighthallSubject: RE: AskCHIS News Alert - 2003 CHIS data is coming! ,Thanks for your inquiry.The answer to both questions is yes, but with the caveat that "characterize the health" and "some legitimate conclusions" are both very subjective and general terms that may or may not be supported by CHIS data. Hence, the old warning that "your actual mileage may vary."That said, for illustration I'm attaching 3 Excel files that I generated with CHIS 2001 data using the AskCHIS tool, located at http://www.chis.ucla.edu/main/default.aspThese are just three CHIS topics of the hundreds available, each cross-tabulated for country of birth. A researcher or analyst would easily be able to build a series of such tables that are of interest, the sum of which should allow that person to draw health profile conclusions about foreign-born populations of California.At 10:50 AM 2/2/2005, Lighthall wrote: I have a question that was posed by someone on a health-relatedlistserve: Can CHIS data be used to characterize the health of theforeign-born population of California? Do you ask that question andcould statewide data be pooled to draw some legitimate conclusions onthe basis of this population as a whole?Thank you, Lighthall, Ph.D.Research DirectorRelational Culture Institute3485 W. Shaw, Suite 103Fresno, CA 93711530 304-0038 mobile559 276-2304 office559 276-2304 faxdavid@... -----Original Message-----From: AskCHIS@... [mailto:AskCHIS@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:52 PMdavid@...Subject: AskCHIS News Alert - 2003 CHIS data is coming!CHIS 2003 DATA RESULTS AVAILABLE ON AskCHIS FEBRUARY 7thThe powerful features of AskCHIS 2.0 can soon be applied to multipleyears of CHIS results! On February 7, 2005 AskCHIS will provide accessto data from the 2003 cycle of CHIS. Nearly one hundred of the mostdemanded CHIS topics will be immediately available for 2003 data, withmany more topics to follow in coming weeks.Many topics are identical in CHIS 2001 and 2003. AskCHIS users will beable to directly compare these topics in one table. Users may alsochoose to combine the 2001 and 2003 sample for these topics, whichprovides more stable estimates for smaller populations and averages outthe differences between 2001 and 2003.POPULATION "WEIGHTS" REVISED FOR CHIS 2001 BASED ON CALIFORNIA DOFAskCHIS employs population "weights" to extrapolate respondents' answersto all of California's population. To allow comparisons with 2003 data,the CHIS 2001 weights were revised. In general, the revised weights mayslightly change prevalence (percentage) estimates. Population (number)estimates may change more, especially for small population groups suchas American Indian/Alaska Native.The CHIS weights are now based on population estimates from theCalifornia Department of Finance (DOF), which are updated morefrequently than US Census estimates. This will also be used to weightfuture CHIS cycles. The new weights also account for socioeconomicvariation in California's population.The new weights also mean AskCHIS can provide estimates at the county,region and state levels for Chinese, Filipinos, Koreans, and Vietnamese,for both 2001 and 2003. Data for smaller Asian ethnic groups willremain available for researchers in the CHIS Public Use Files.We thank all the supporters of CHIS 2003, and all the AskCHIS users whocontinue to make suggestions for improvements.If you have any questions, please feel free to reply to this email. Andbe sure to visit AskCHIS athttp://www.chis.ucla.edu/main/default.asp?s=QB18426 beginning February 7to get results from CHIS 2003!Sincerely, MindelWeb Development ManagerUCLA Center for Health Policy Research MindelWeb Development ManagerUCLA Center for Health Policy Research10911 Weyburn Avenue, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90024 310-794-6963-tel 310-794-2686-fax emindel@... Website: http://www.healthpolicy.ucla.edu To Post a message, send it to: GroupsTo Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: -unsubscribe To Post a message, send it to: GroupsTo Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: -unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.