Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 Rhonda, I have pictures from several ERCP's showing chronic changes, calcifications and severe strictures of the pancreas. Hense, the diagnosis of CP. I had 1 CT Scan done 2 years ago. The doctor who ordered the test told me he ordered the thinnest slices of the pancreas possible. The test showed absolutly nothing wrong with the pancreas. The radiologist who read the films stated unremarkable pancreas. That " specialist " told me I may have had something wrong a long time ago, but it's over now. Eat, Drink (literally) and be merry for I am cured! We all know you are never cured from CP. AP, yeah. CP, never! Still no alcohol after AP too. Just wanted to put that in there. My point is, a CT Scan and ultrasounds are INCONCLUSIVE tests and should be ignored. Thats why we call an ERCP the gold standard for testing for CP. If an ERCP showed that you're pancreas has chronic changes to it, then that just doesn't go away. It may never show up on any other tests, nor does it go away....even with time. It is my humble opinion that most doctors believe in and rely upon inconclusive testing too much. If you can't see it, then it must not be real seems to be the normal anymore.....Along with the " IBS " standard when they can't figure out why your hurting. Just my opinion, Sandy in Ca -------------- Original message -------------- Hi everyone, I havent checked in in quite some time. But, I do have a question. I had an Endoscopic Ultrasound last month after more than a year of CP, but they found nothing this time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 HI Rhonda. An EUS is a very valuable tool for looking at the outside of the pancreas, the organ itself. Good news that you no longer have any issues with the psuedocyst. How did the psuedocyst get there in the first place. Have you ever had an ercp? It enables the docs to look inside the pancreas. To see the ducts and check the sphincters. Without that I dont see how you could be diagnosed either way. I hope you dont have it and that doc is correct. However, I would think a second opinion would be a wise move. The sooner the better. No psuedocyst tho, and thats a good thing. Warmy, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.