OT/ Another new law while you were sleeping

[Guest guest]

This is not meant to start a policial bash. I just wondered why this is not FRONT PAGE NEWS? It seems to be a bill passed to hold someone who holds a threat to the USA. Remember how a bill was slipped in when Bush was Pres. to prevent anyone ever sueing a Vaccine maker ever again. And BTW: That's the only co's you cannot sue in the USA. Weird... Or a crafting of bigger things to come. Now we have this law that the White house, has been pressing and pressing to get passed. Could it be some day, parents will be in prisoned for refusing to vaccinate? It seems there is no end in sight what kinds of law and bills that can get passed into law while we sleep. http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-lohier-ndaa-stay-414/With only Judge Lohier's single ruling on Monday, the federal government has been once again granted the go ahead to imprison any person "who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners" until a poorly defined deadline described as merely "the end of the hostilities." The ruling comes despite Judge Forrest's earlier decision that the NDAA fails to"pass constitutional muster" and that the legislation contained elements that had a "chilling impact on First Amendment rights"Because alleged terrorists are so broadly defined as to include anyone with simple associations with enemy forces, some members of the press have feared that simply speaking with adversaries of the state can land them behind bars."First Amendment rights are guaranteed by the Constitution and cannot be legislated away," Judge Forrest wrote last week. "This Court rejects the Government's suggestion that American citizens can be placed in military detention indefinitely, for acts they could not predict might subject them to detention."Bruce Afran, a co-counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case Hedges v Obama, said Monday that he suspects the White House has been relentless in this case because they are already employing the NDAA to imprison Americans, or plan to shortly.

[Guest guest]

>

>

> This is not meant to start a policial bash. I just wondered why this is

> not FRONT PAGE NEWS? It seems to be a bill passed to hold someone who

> holds a threat to the USA. Remember how a bill was slipped in when Bush

> was Pres. to prevent anyone ever sueing a Vaccine maker ever again. And

> BTW: That's the only co's you cannot sue in the USA. Weird... Or a

> crafting of bigger things to come. Now we have this law that the White

> house, has been pressing and pressing to get passed. Could it be some

> day, parents will be in prisoned for refusing to vaccinate? It seems

> there is no end in sight what kinds of law and bills that can get passed

> into law while we sleep.

>

> http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-lohier-ndaa-stay-414/

>

> With only Judge Lohier's single ruling on Monday, the federal government

> has been once again granted the go ahead to imprison any person " who was

> part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated

> forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its

> coalition partners " until a poorly defined deadline described as merely

> " the end of the hostilities. " The ruling comes despite Judge Forrest's

> earlier decision that the NDAA fails to " pass constitutional muster " and

> that the legislation contained elements that had a " chilling impact on

> First Amendment rights "

>

> Because alleged terrorists are so broadly defined as to include anyone

> with simple associations with enemy forces, some members of the press

> have feared that simply speaking with adversaries of the state can land

> them behind bars.

>

> " First Amendment rights are guaranteed by the Constitution and cannot be

> legislated away, " Judge Forrest wrote last week. " This Court rejects the

> Government's suggestion that American citizens can be placed in military

> detention indefinitely, for acts they could not predict might subject

> them to detention. "

>

> Bruce Afran, a co-counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case Hedges

> v Obama, said Monday that he suspects the White House has been

> relentless in this case because they are already employing the NDAA to

> imprison Americans, or plan to shortly.

>

I was just talking about this with the Moms and Dads on autim web.its downright

disturbing.i guess theres a list at the airport of Americans to keep an eye on

also.these are Americans who speak in the media and online about our rights

being taken away.The end of America a great doc talks alot about this.I am

scared out of my wits about this and other things going on in the world, and

Pray by the time my child is older this may go away although i fear it'll be

like a prison by then.