Guest guest Posted May 19, 2008 Report Share Posted May 19, 2008 Comments below - Posted by: " " lindajaytee@... lindajaytee Sat May 17, 2008 7:51 am (PDT) >> Jackie- >> DMSA does chelate arsenic (it's a modification of BAL, which was an old >> antidote for ite, an arsenic based poison gas). Andy does say >> that DMPS >> is a more effective " accessory chelator " (over and above ALA), but >> it doesn't >> appear that there is enough arsenic to worry about it, really. He >> does need to >> work on the lead with DMSA, and so that will automatically help with >> the little >> arsenic that appeared in the hair. If there was no lead, then >> probably just >> the methylation support would be enough. I think the only reason >> for the pain >> in the a** of ALA 3 hour dosing would be to test if there is any >> mercury left >> up there. >Mercury poisoning hasn't been ruled out. It is likely that there is >significant mercury up there, forced there by the IVs. I agree. I don't know if it's likely, but it's certainly a po**ibility. That's why the suggestion to try ALA. >From the >information that we have there have been no treatments to remove >mercury, and it doesn't fall out on it's own My guess is that low >dose ALA will be needed for a long time. I don't want to be so certain as I don't have any data that makes me confident one way or another, neither hair test nor symptoms. Still, given history, I would consider the ALA - and it can't do any harm, given that it could help with any lead in the brain. >> Dave. >> ---------------- >> methylation enhancers (for arsenic)- take Jarrow " Homocysteine support " . >I'm surprised that you have so much faith in methylation enhancers. I >can see how they are needed for support, but where does it say that >they are all a person needs for arsenic? The arsenic is not very elevated, . In fact, it's almost not necessary to mention it. To quote Andy, " If hair arsenic is very elevated in the presence of normal orderly mineral transport then arsenic toxicity should be suspected and treated by chelation. " Here, we neither have " very elevated " arsenic, nor really totally orderly mineral transport (though it doesn't satisfy the counting rules). If you are interested, you might want to have a look at HTI, p.240. > Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.