Guest guest Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 8oz of tuna is about 30mcg of methyl mercury. That's as much as in a vaccine. So yes, after eating tuna, you should be very careful about chelation. You probably won't need to wait 3 months before using ALA, since methyl mercury goes right to your brain, and quickly. I'm not sure what the excretion half life of mHg in the body (as opposed to brain) is, but I'm guessing it is lower than the average of 77 days for inorganic Hg. (There is a link to a mercury-in-fish calculator here: http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/mercury/tuna.asp) As for the fluorescent bulb, that would lead to ongoing exposure. I don't know how much mercury is in such a bulb, so I don't know how serious it is, but my impression from reading around on AM & FDC is that it is something to take seriously. As for the apparently no mercury vaccine - I believe the " trace " levels of mercury are from 1 to 3 mcg/dose. That is significant. If they claim there is none at all, well ... I'm not sure I believe them, frankly. I really don't know as they have retooled their whole assembly lines. That's a huge capital expense. And, I've seen admitted examples of pharmcos including inserts that were not accurate and had admissions. But then - I would never consider ever allowing anyone to stick a needle into me again. Dave. ---------- Posted by: " cfiatzph " cfiatzph@... cfiatzph Sat May 31, 2008 3:50 pm (PDT) Why would I need to avoid ALA if the vaccine insert lists nothing? Thats like saying I had tuna fish, or broke a fluorescent lightbulb, stop chelating for three months? Just curious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.