Guest guest Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 In a message dated 12/31/2005 5:18:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, chrischristoph@... writes: Donelle, Thats the irony of the whole situation. When Mike had his operation the surgeon went to great lengths to reassure us that his liver was clear. Yet despite 12 sessions of chemo he now has mets to the liver! Having surgery must release it into the blood stream. I wonder if anyone has compared the results of patients who received chemo before the op as opposed to those only post op and which group did better with regards to mets or no mets? Chris Happy New Year, Chris!!! I've always wondered if the liver mets were already there?? We didn't have enough knowledge to even ask...I'll have to look back at my notes to see what testing was done to start with, but from my best recollection, Glenn only had a colonoscopy and then the surgery. Don't think the liver was ever even checked. And with a tumor as large as his...they said it was probably 10 yrs. in the growing... wouldn't you think they would check for mets, esp. after cancerous lymph nodes were found?? I'm also curious as to when they actually did a CT or something.... I would like to get those xrays....was the liver addressed?? This is so sad .... and what happens when one is not knowledgeable... I realize Glenn had some other stuff going on in his body...including previous liver damage from when he was a " young and tender sailor " that he was only vaguely aware of...had never had any problems at all....at that time, they told him not to worry about it.....he quit drinking 20+ yrs ago... plus the uncontrolled diabetes, bad eating habits, etc. etc. But, I, too, would be interested to know if chemo prior to surgery results in better odds. We are praying for you and Mike...give him a hug for us and ask him to keep fighting...he can beat this damn monster!! Lots of hugs and prayers, Donelle Caregiver to Glenn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 In a message dated 1/1/2006 8:48:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, m_womack@... writes: I think it is automatic for them to check all the other organs when they do a resection. I believe they feel and look for the mets. The first thing once colon cancer is found should be to do the CEA test for the pre-surgery level, and a CAT scan to check for mets. My husband had both of these done on the day he had his colonoscopy before he went home to return the next day for the surgery. But micromets cannot be detected even with a PET scan. MA Interesting, Ann... I'm going to check our records re: a CT Scan, just out of curiosity. But, one thing's for sure, if nothing was detected at the time of the discovery of the colon cancer and prior to or after surgery resection, then the liver mets surely did grow fast within 8 months, while he was on chemo, to the point of being inoperable. Scary crap!! Lots of hugs and prayers, Donelle Caregiver to Glenn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 I think it is automatic for them to check all the other organs when they do a resection. I believe they feel and look for the mets. The first thing once colon cancer is found should be to do the CEA test for the pre-surgery level, and a CAT scan to check for mets. My husband had both of these done on the day he had his colonoscopy before he went home to return the next day for the surgery. But micromets cannot be detected even with a PET scan. MA iginal Message ----- From: Grandmommyandme@... To: colon_cancer_support Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Natural healing-speed CC grows/Chris In a message dated 12/31/2005 5:18:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, chrischristoph@... writes: Donelle, Thats the irony of the whole situation. When Mike had his operation the surgeon went to great lengths to reassure us that his liver was clear. Yet despite 12 sessions of chemo he now has mets to the liver! Having surgery must release it into the blood stream. I wonder if anyone has compared the results of patients who received chemo before the op as opposed to those only post op and which group did better with regards to mets or no mets? Chris Happy New Year, Chris!!! I've always wondered if the liver mets were already there?? We didn't have enough knowledge to even ask...I'll have to look back at my notes to see what testing was done to start with, but from my best recollection, Glenn only had a colonoscopy and then the surgery. Don't think the liver was ever even checked. And with a tumor as large as his...they said it was probably 10 yrs. in the growing... wouldn't you think they would check for mets, esp. after cancerous lymph nodes were found?? I'm also curious as to when they actually did a CT or something.... I would like to get those xrays....was the liver addressed?? This is so sad .... and what happens when one is not knowledgeable... I realize Glenn had some other stuff going on in his body...including previous liver damage from when he was a " young and tender sailor " that he was only vaguely aware of...had never had any problems at all....at that time, they told him not to worry about it.....he quit drinking 20+ yrs ago... plus the uncontrolled diabetes, bad eating habits, etc. etc. But, I, too, would be interested to know if chemo prior to surgery results in better odds. We are praying for you and Mike...give him a hug for us and ask him to keep fighting...he can beat this damn monster!! Lots of hugs and prayers, Donelle Caregiver to Glenn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.